Re: [Tagging] phone validity - phone "preset"

2017-09-05 Thread André Pirard
On 2017-09-05 21:01, Lukas Sommer wrote: > It would likely yet help a lot if th editors would simply check if > > - the number does not start with “+” > - the number (after the starting “+” sign) contains other characters > then digits, spaces (and maybe dashes). > > This is quite simple and could

Re: [Tagging] phone validity - phone "preset"

2017-09-05 Thread Tod Fitch
I would not be too hard to make a validity checker for any phone:*=* field. By the wiki [1] we should be formatting the number per ITU E.123. That requires a leading “+” and a space delimiter between digits groups. [2] More over, all international telephone numbers need to conform to ITU E.164

Re: [Tagging] Fire hydrants vs suction_point

2017-09-05 Thread Viking
Hi all. @Marc > and is this tag well used? I am not able to judge whether values are realistic Well, as in every tag, there are wrong values. But now, with a more clear description on the wiki, there will be less errors and future corrections will be possible. Anyway all values of

Re: [Tagging] phone validity - phone "preset"

2017-09-05 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On 6 September 2017 at 02:51, marc marc wrote: > Hello, > > on the french-speaking mailing, a contributor noticed a high rate > of incorrect value for the tag "phone". the most common error is using > the national format number instead of the international format. >

Re: [Tagging] Embassies and administrative boundaries

2017-09-05 Thread Walter Nordmann
Hi frederik (Thankfully nobody has started to actually add embassies to a country's boundary relation yet. Not that I know of anyway.) Is it a common practice to add boundary=administrative to embassies? Does it make sense? i don't hope so. In germany i know, that the area of an ebassy is NOT

Re: [Tagging] phone validity - phone "preset"

2017-09-05 Thread Lukas Sommer
It would likely yet help a lot if th editors would simply check if - the number does not start with “+” - the number (after the starting “+” sign) contains other characters then digits, spaces (and maybe dashes). This is quite simple and could nevertheless catch yet a lot of issues… 2017-09-05

[Tagging] phone validity - phone "preset"

2017-09-05 Thread marc marc
Hello, on the french-speaking mailing, a contributor noticed a high rate of incorrect value for the tag "phone". the most common error is using the national format number instead of the international format. A monthly project 'll maybe fix some of those errors. Some quality tool can help those

Re: [Tagging] Embassies and administrative boundaries

2017-09-05 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Does it make sense? From what I understand from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diplomatic_mission#Extraterritoriality, no. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] farm schools?

2017-09-05 Thread Jerry Clough - OSM
From: Tom Pfeifer To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, 4 September 2017, 22:56 Subject: Re: [Tagging] farm schools? On 04.09.2017 22:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> On 4. Sep 2017, at 21:45, José G Moya Y. wrote: >> In Spanish

[Tagging] Embassies and administrative boundaries

2017-09-05 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, a complaint to DWG unearthed the following: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176173908 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121511807 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122886481 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223287694 All are embassies in Skopje tagged with "boundary=administrative", one

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Language information)

2017-09-05 Thread André Pirard
On 2017-08-30 13:34, Lukas Sommer wrote: > Voting at > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Language_information > is open. Hi Lukas, The syntax is wrong. It must be :language= (qualifier to the right). Example too language:name=bg --> name:language=bg Many wiki definitions