Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Street_furniture

Ok. I will revert it. It just implies deleting a street number, reloading my trace and repointing street number from my trace (~0.5 m difference). I will correct it this time using PNOA only. Regards. El 18/10/2017 12:57, "Philip Barnes" escribió: > It has been pointed out

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Street_furniture

It has been pointed out to you by myself and others that you must not use Google when mapping. Any changes that have involved Google should be reverted. Cheers Phil (trigpoint) On 18 October 2017 11:50:12 BST, "José G Moya Y." wrote: >Ok. I eventually used google to

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Street_furniture

Ok. I eventually used google to correct my own gps traces (i. e. seeing if the point where i have tagged the third building in a row is really at that point). I rechecked it with other imaginery, also, to avoid errors due satellite angle and shadows so I didn't use google as main source (the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Street_furniture

2017-10-18 1:26 GMT+02:00 Graeme Fitzpatrick : > > On the subject of street cabinets, what about pits / manholes? > > We have a lot of facilities (eg telephone / internet connections, water / > gas meters) especially in residential areas, located in underground pits, > with

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Street_furniture

Please do not even look at Google when mapping, we do not have permission to use it. Phil (trigpoint) On 17 October 2017 23:28:53 BST, "José G Moya Y." wrote: >Hi! >I'm just a novice, but after two months following this list I >understand >that: > >a) Tags are grouped by

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant Extensions)

Thanks for the effort you put in this proposal and splitting it again. Regarding your last question how to proceed: I would aim for the proposals to get approved (even if it only means that there are some people on the tagging list how voted for it and it is not related to all the other