The best way to keep it objective would be to tag what it IS and not
what it is CALLED. An outdoor shop is what some people call a shop (not
so controversial) which sells camping gear (probably not too
controversial) and clothing, safety equipment, ...
If we had a taxonomy of classes of things, m
Regarding the "objectivity in the tag definition " there's still a lot of
work to do in the wiki.
What defines a sport shop versus an outdoor shop, for example ? IMHO only a
number of values may define something 'objective'.
Recently, there's been a discussion about landing strips for airplanes.
> That's probably to be discussed over at tagging mailing list.
Sorry, forget this last sentence.
Given that there's like wheelchair=yes and kids_area=yes [1] one could
introduce s'thing like animal friendly properties to amenities (bar,
restaurant, hotel, ...).
But IMHO it should be declared as s
Hi,
There are similar keys like "wheelchair" and allowed vehicles in
streets (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access ).
If there's enough objectivity in the tag definition I'd support that.
That's probably to be discussed over at tagging mailing list.
:Stefan
2017-10-29 21:56 GMT+01:00 P
On Sun, 2017-10-29 at 21:29 +0100, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> On 29.10.2017 16:44, Andrew Hain wrote:
> > How should an establishment that bills itself as “the dog friendly
> > cafe” be tagged?
>
> dog=* is used 8615 times, of which 1875 are dog=yes.
> 5498 uses are on highways, 854 on amenities and 111
On 29.10.2017 16:44, Andrew Hain wrote:
How should an establishment that bills itself as “the dog friendly cafe” be
tagged?
dog=* is used 8615 times, of which 1875 are dog=yes.
5498 uses are on highways, 854 on amenities and 1114 together with opening_hours
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/k
How should an establishment that bills itself as “the dog friendly cafe” be
tagged?
--
Andrew
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
We are arguing about a temporary state of affairs. Sooner or later,
Nominatim and others will be able to assign addresses to nodes inside a
polygon, and renderers will be able to see that the same address is
rendered 3 times. Until then we have to do what we can with what we have.
And not start mak
sent from a phone
> On 26. Oct 2017, at 17:01, Marc Zoutendijk wrote:
>
> Because all three companies had an office=research tag and because the office
> tag is not rendered at all on the standard map(!!) but only shows the
> addr:housenumber (when present), the above described tagging resul
On 29 October 2017 at 08:16, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> & I must admit to being "guilty" of listing both types of address -
> filling in the address details of the type of building / shop / POI & then
> also adding an address node, usually on it's driveway.
>
> My reasoning is that my navigatio
10 matches
Mail list logo
