Re: [Tagging] Deprecating of leisure=common and leisure=village_green

2017-12-05 Thread Marc Gemis
> 1. If it is grass: tag it as grass > 2. if it is a tree: tag it as a tree > 3. if it is a hedge: tag it as a hedge > 4. if it is a park: tag it as a park > 5. if it is a flowerbed: tag it as a flowerbed > > and I now add: > > 6. if it is a garden: tag it as a garden > 4 & 6 (park & garden) are

Re: [Tagging] Deprecating of leisure=common and leisure=village_green

2017-12-05 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-12-05 18:46 GMT+01:00 Daniel Koć : > W dniu 05.12.2017 o 18:38, Martin Koppenhoefer pisze: > > so you want to tag the vegetation? Because both, common and village green > are mostly about (permissive) access and or usage rights, and ownership (in > my perception). > > > You

Re: [Tagging] Deprecating of leisure=common and leisure=village_green

2017-12-05 Thread Daniel Koć
W dniu 05.12.2017 o 18:38, Martin Koppenhoefer pisze: so you want to tag the vegetation? Because both, common and village green are mostly about (permissive) access and or usage rights, and ownership (in my perception). You talk about core definition, but these tags are heavily misused for

Re: [Tagging] Deprecating of leisure=common and leisure=village_green

2017-12-05 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-12-05 18:33 GMT+01:00 Daniel Koć : > W dniu 05.12.2017 o 18:23, Martin Koppenhoefer pisze: > > What areas would you want to use these tags on? grass areas between > carriageways, on crossings, etc.? Uncultivated land inside settlements > (i.e. nature conquering the area)?

Re: [Tagging] Deprecating of leisure=common and leisure=village_green

2017-12-05 Thread Daniel Koć
W dniu 05.12.2017 o 18:23, Martin Koppenhoefer pisze: What areas would you want to use these tags on? grass areas between carriageways, on crossings, etc.? Uncultivated land inside settlements (i.e. nature conquering the area)? Flowerbeds alongside the road or sidewalk? Etc. In case of

Re: [Tagging] Deprecating of leisure=common and leisure=village_green

2017-12-05 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-12-03 0:28 GMT+01:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > Mixed vegetation? Possibly better with separated values grass, trees, > shrubs??? > >> >> We already have them, but they're not always easy to separate. Having >> some general tags is very useful in such cases and doesn't force you to >>

Re: [Tagging] Deprecating of leisure=common and leisure=village_green

2017-12-05 Thread Daniel Koć
W dniu 03.12.2017 o 00:28, Warin pisze: landuse=grass?!!! No. City planed 'open area' might be better? The surface is a land cover, not a land use issue. An 'open space' could be concrete and still used for recreation, eating lunch or enjoying the sun. Huumm example? Some 'town squares' are

Re: [Tagging] a tag for "really-really-freestores"

2017-12-05 Thread Selfish Seahorse
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > the obvious proposal would be > amenity=freeshop or give-away_shop or sth similar, if you want to avoid the > shop key. Good idea! That seems to make more sense than shop=*. > Maybe I'm wrong (English not my first language), but I thought a

Re: [Tagging] a tag for "really-really-freestores"

2017-12-05 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-12-04 22:12 GMT+01:00, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > fee=no ??? This is already in use with other things. Maybe I'm wrong (English not my first language), but I thought a fee is a payment for a service or admission, hence not usable for purchase prices of items. Cheers, Martin