> 1. If it is grass: tag it as grass
> 2. if it is a tree: tag it as a tree
> 3. if it is a hedge: tag it as a hedge
> 4. if it is a park: tag it as a park
> 5. if it is a flowerbed: tag it as a flowerbed
>
> and I now add:
>
> 6. if it is a garden: tag it as a garden
>
4 & 6 (park & garden) are
2017-12-05 18:46 GMT+01:00 Daniel Koć :
> W dniu 05.12.2017 o 18:38, Martin Koppenhoefer pisze:
>
> so you want to tag the vegetation? Because both, common and village green
> are mostly about (permissive) access and or usage rights, and ownership (in
> my perception).
>
>
> You
W dniu 05.12.2017 o 18:38, Martin Koppenhoefer pisze:
so you want to tag the vegetation? Because both, common and village
green are mostly about (permissive) access and or usage rights, and
ownership (in my perception).
You talk about core definition, but these tags are heavily misused for
2017-12-05 18:33 GMT+01:00 Daniel Koć :
> W dniu 05.12.2017 o 18:23, Martin Koppenhoefer pisze:
>
> What areas would you want to use these tags on? grass areas between
> carriageways, on crossings, etc.? Uncultivated land inside settlements
> (i.e. nature conquering the area)?
W dniu 05.12.2017 o 18:23, Martin Koppenhoefer pisze:
What areas would you want to use these tags on? grass areas between
carriageways, on crossings, etc.? Uncultivated land inside settlements
(i.e. nature conquering the area)? Flowerbeds alongside the road or
sidewalk? Etc.
In case of
2017-12-03 0:28 GMT+01:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
> Mixed vegetation? Possibly better with separated values grass, trees,
> shrubs???
>
>>
>> We already have them, but they're not always easy to separate. Having
>> some general tags is very useful in such cases and doesn't force you to
>>
W dniu 03.12.2017 o 00:28, Warin pisze:
landuse=grass?!!! No. City planed 'open area' might be better?
The surface is a land cover, not a land use issue. An 'open space'
could be concrete and still used for recreation, eating lunch or
enjoying the sun.
Huumm example? Some 'town squares' are
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> the obvious proposal would be
> amenity=freeshop or give-away_shop or sth similar, if you want to avoid the
> shop key.
Good idea! That seems to make more sense than shop=*.
> Maybe I'm wrong (English not my first language), but I thought a
2017-12-04 22:12 GMT+01:00, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
> fee=no ??? This is already in use with other things.
Maybe I'm wrong (English not my first language), but I thought a fee
is a payment for a service or admission, hence not usable for purchase
prices of items.
Cheers,
Martin