Re: [Tagging] tagging for decaying features

On 07-Jan-18 09:59 AM, Richard wrote: On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 07:19:31AM +1100, Warin wrote: 2) I have not put in any examples - just placed the birthing, decay and repurpose categories on the main page. I hoped to bring some organisation to the page and simplify the understanding. If this

Re: [Tagging] tagging for decaying features

On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 07:19:31AM +1100, Warin wrote: > > 2) I have not put in any examples - just placed the birthing, decay and > repurpose categories on the main page. > > I hoped to bring some organisation to the page and simplify the > understanding. If this has exposed misuse GOOD! It

Re: [Tagging] Atmospheric railways: the aeromovel of Jarkarta and Porto Alegre

sent from a phone > On 5. Jan 2018, at 01:51, Fernando Trebien wrote: > > . So I'm wondering if they should be mapped as > railway=subway due to the lack of at-grade intersections with other > types of traffic, or as railway=tram considering the standards of the >

Re: [Tagging] Atmospheric railways: the aeromovel of Jarkarta and Porto Alegre

sent from a phone > On 5. Jan 2018, at 01:51, Fernando Trebien wrote: > > They also do not connect "the inner city with the > surroundings" IMHO this is not a good criterion and should be removed. Why should systems that connect the surroundings of a city