On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:42 PM Dave Swarthout
wrote:
> I've asked this question before on OpenStreetMap Help and mapped the
route as suggested. (
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/31449/how-do-i-map-a-canoe-route).
I've mapped the portages where one carries the canoe as highway=footpath
Hi,
The bushwalking/tramping people have increasing numbers of boot cleaning
stations between rejoins to stop the spread of plants/fungi/pathogens.
They are not for beauty of the boots but for a practical purpose.
Many have big brushes (mounted facing up) to clean soil out of your
shoes and
Canoe routes doesn't render because few are mapped, and because few are
interested in.
Hiking routes and ski pistes are some niche data that get rendered by specialty
maps.
A specialty map dedicated to this kind of routes could be a nice and not so big
project as a tile overlay, maybe along
Have you checked out OpenSeaMap.org and their related wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenSeaMap? It might get you started.
Clifford
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:19 AM Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> How to map a nautical channel [1] ?
>
>
> [1]
Dave,
When you add a ferry route, route=ferry to a way it renders. You might
want to tag the water route as route=canoe then create a relation that
covers the entire route including the water portion and the portaging
sections in the overall route? That the strategy used to map highway routes
How to map a nautical channel [1] ?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channel_(geography)#Nautical_channels
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi,
I've asked this question before on OpenStreetMap Help and mapped the route
as suggested. (
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/31449/how-do-i-map-a-canoe-route).
I've mapped the portages where one carries the canoe as
highway=footpath but the water portions of the route do not show up in
I was going to suggest the same as Eric. Best to use the ISO codes for the
languages (though I think maybe the three-letter codes are better) and to
use language as the prefix.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 4:30 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> language information could be an interesting tag for tourist
Hi,
language information could be an interesting tag for tourist places, schools,
etc.
but I think that this method is not the best one.
I’d expect something like:
language=eo
Or with multiple languages
language=en;de;fr;es;eo
language:signs=en;de;fr
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> I don’t, but apparently this mapper is interested in features regarding
> their esperanto support, and I don’t see a reason not to allow it.
>
> Spoken languages could be an interesting attribute for tourists as well,
> at least
sent from a phone
> On 28. Jun 2018, at 14:22, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
>> On 28 June 2018 at 11:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>> teaches:esperanto=yes
>
> Do we really want to replicate schools' and colleges' prospectuses?
I don’t, but apparently this mapper is interested in features
On 28 June 2018 at 11:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> teaches:esperanto=yes
Do we really want to replicate schools' and colleges' prospectuses?
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
___
Tagging mailing list
On 2018-06-28 13:40, Paul Allen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 4:40 AM, André Pirard
mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 2018-06-27 16:28, Paul Allen wrote:
[Suggestion to use amenity=charging_station + charging:bicycle=yes +
charging:car=yes
I remember having been told off
czw., 28 cze 2018, 12:59 użytkownik Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdre...@gmail.com> napisał:
>
> I agree it would be better to be more explicit, like teaches:esperanto=yes
> or speaks:esperanto=yes
>
> Did you contact przem?
>
Sure. Waiting for reply, but I want to give constructive feedback to
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 4:40 AM, André Pirard
wrote:
> On 2018-06-27 16:28, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> [Suggestion to use amenity=charging_station + charging:bicycle=yes +
charging:car=yes
> I remember having been told off by someone who doesn't like namespaces:
> "we are not doing like that" ;-)
>
2018-06-28 12:21 GMT+02:00 Michał Brzozowski :
> Today user przem started to add esperanto=yes to two kinds of objects
> - streets named after Zamenhof (creator of it)
> - schools which presumably use or teach it
>
> But how about the second case?
> esperanto=yes seems too vague to be useful, and
Hi,
Today user przem started to add esperanto=yes to two kinds of objects
- streets named after Zamenhof (creator of it)
- schools which presumably use or teach it
For the first case it would be correct to tag name:etymology:wikidata=Q11758
But how about the second case?
esperanto=yes seems too
17 matches
Mail list logo
