Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 13:24:22 +0200
From: Rory McCann
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] tagging religion-based access & on-topic
[...]
And I think we can have a tagging discussion without mocking all
religions (not all of which believe in an afterlife BTW).
[...]
access:muslim=yes would need to be combined with access=no,what would be
problematic - if anybody is processing access info it would end
marking temples as forbidden.
And yes, trolling in form of mocking anybody should not be present
on OSM mailing lists.
5. Lipiec 2018 13:24 od
I think access:*=yes/no is the most friendly to data consumers since a
consumer can just look at all keys starting with "access:" and go from
there. This could be useful for less frequent access tags.
And I think we can have a tagging discussion without mocking all
religions (not all of which
On 05/07/18 06:49, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 07/05/2018 12:59 AM, Jmapb wrote:
So I was considering changing them to
shop=fortune_teller.
But doesn't the average psychic offer more than just fortune telling?
Relationship counselling, crime detection, treasure hunting, mind
reading,
At this moment this is my favourite. It will not break existing data
consumerslike access=no, muslim=yes would, it should be readable for others,it
avoids problems where it would turn out that only some subtype of religion
iswelcomed at given place but it was not clear for an outsider.
29.
Hi,
On 07/05/2018 12:59 AM, Jmapb wrote:
> So I was considering changing them to
> shop=fortune_teller.
But doesn't the average psychic offer more than just fortune telling?
Relationship counselling, crime detection, treasure hunting, mind
reading, supernatural business consulting...
I would
