Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 107, Issue 111

2018-08-25 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 at 05:32, St Niklaas wrote: > Hi Guys, > > > Have a look at this solution, made just to allow other / faster traffic to > pass a slow agricultural vehicle, more specific it is a rule that goes for > all slow moving traffic not reaching a speed of 25 km/hr. > >

Re: [Tagging] Time to deprecate place=region and boundary=region?

2018-08-25 Thread marc marc
Le 24. 08. 18 à 18:47, egil a écrit : > I much prefer boundary=administrative + border_type=region over > boundary=region and place=region. some regions aren't a administrative stuff. ex with mountain area http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7465762 or a valley

Re: [Tagging] Stolpersteine tagging scheme problem

2018-08-25 Thread Paul Allen
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > there is no definition for the plaque tag and I am not able to deduct a > system by looking at the values: > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/plaque#values > > > Most used value is “metal” which would fit for a stolperstein

Re: [Tagging] Stolpersteine tagging scheme problem

2018-08-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 25. Aug 2018, at 15:46, Paul Allen wrote: > > [lutz] >> Thanks. He has already responded in this thread as the one who has chosen >> historic=memorial + memorial=plaque + plaque=stolperstein (as opposed to 4 >> others who prefer historic=memorial +

Re: [Tagging] Stolpersteine tagging scheme problem

2018-08-25 Thread Peter Elderson
I am not sure. Once I get around to it I am sure I can find out by contacting the right people. I think they are also registered as gravestones by the funeral branche. Mvg Peter Elderson > Op 25 aug. 2018 om 18:05 heeft Andy Mabbett het > volgende geschreven: > >> On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 at

Re: [Tagging] Stolpersteine tagging scheme problem

2018-08-25 Thread Andy Mabbett
On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 at 09:13, Peter Elderson wrote: > In Nederland the Stolpersteine project has caught on and there is a database. Is that online, please? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Slow vehicle turnouts

2018-08-25 Thread Albert Pundt
lanes:forward and lanes:backward is definitely correct here. No need to make a whole new tag for it, and I really don't see how it's too tedious to map this way (plus adding something like hgv:lanes:forward=no|designated for the situation). On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 11:12 AM Dave Swarthout wrote:

Re: [Tagging] Slow vehicle turnouts

2018-08-25 Thread Steve Doerr
On 25/08/2018 01:17, Dave Swarthout wrote: I've been trying to decide tagging for slow-vehicle turnouts consisting of a lane added to the right side (in the U.S.) of the road so that slow moving vehicles can pull aside to allow following vehicles to pass. The best I can come up with is the tag

Re: [Tagging] Slow vehicle turnouts

2018-08-25 Thread Dave Swarthout
Kevin wrote: > lanes:forward=* and lanes:backward=* is the best that I've found so >far to describe truck climbing lanes and similar features. They don't >appear in your image to be grade-separated, so they don't need to be >separate ways - one way for each section of the road, with appropriate

Re: [Tagging] Stolpersteine tagging scheme problem

2018-08-25 Thread Paul Allen
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Daniel Koć wrote: > W dniu 25.08.2018 o 02:49, Paul Allen pisze: > > I did some searching pretty much at random and found > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4892971695 which has > memorial=stoperstein + memorial:type=stolperstein, which is one way of > handling

Re: [Tagging] Slow vehicle turnouts

2018-08-25 Thread Warin
On 25/08/18 10:17, Dave Swarthout wrote: I've been trying to decide tagging for slow-vehicle turnouts consisting of a lane added to the right side (in the U.S.) of the road so that slow moving vehicles can pull aside to allow following vehicles to pass. The best I can come up with is the tag

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Evacuation Routes

2018-08-25 Thread Yves
Bah, 8 votes on such a specialized feature is a nice score ;-). Maybe you could have advertised on hot@ to gain more traction. Yves ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] nobrand

2018-08-25 Thread Cascafico Giovanni
Got it. +5k nodes imported without brand key Il 25 ago 2018 12:16 AM, "Graeme Fitzpatrick" ha scritto: > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 at 18:29, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > >> >> > On 24. Aug 2018, at 09:57, Cascafico Giovanni >> wrote: >> > >> > IMHO all records tagged brand="Pompe Bianche"

Re: [Tagging] addr:street=* combined with place=square, name=*

2018-08-25 Thread Johannes Singler
Am 15.08.2018 um 11:35 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: sent from a phone On 15. Aug 2018, at 07:43, Johannes Singler wrote: I'm just saying there is no absolutely blatant one-to-one correlation addr:street<->highway I would say there is, and in the other cases, addr:street is not the