Re: [Tagging] How to tag access restriction on interstate highway crossovers?

2019-01-03 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 3:32 PM Xavier wrote: > > By "interstate highway crossovers" I mean small bits of road that > connect the two carriage ways of a US interstate highway and are signed > as "Authorized Vehicles Only" (at least in Virginia they are signed > this way). > > An example is here:

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Hierarchies route=bicycle)

2019-01-03 Thread Peter Elderson
Well, I regularly edit and maintain a lot of routes, route hierarchies and node networks. Id is fine for a few basic things, adding and editing tags, combining two routes in a superroute. Now try checking and sorting routes from hundreds up to thousands of members, including forward and

[Tagging] A fool with a tool ... Vehicle service tags

2019-01-03 Thread Thilo Haug OSM
Forgot to mention : " it follows what `service:bicycle:*` does." is not true. And if you introduce a new system, you should also explain the namespace structure. And not just create a hard to find "notice" which isn't linked to from the affected existing tags

[Tagging] A fool with a tool ... Vehicle service tags

2019-01-03 Thread Thilo Haug OSM
8X-- Bryan Housel bhousel at gmail.com Thu Jan 3 04:39:03 UTC 2019We discussed it here on this list last year. You started the thread even, so you can’t pretend like you "just realized” it. I even asked people to update the wiki.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Hierarchies route=bicycle)

2019-01-03 Thread Andy Townsend
On 03/01/2019 14:37, Peter Elderson wrote: What about the same question without the “easily”? I occasionally (especially with a DWG hat on) have to modify relations on a member-by-member basis, and depending on what exactly what you want to do, JOSM, P2 or something else might be the best

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Hierarchies route=bicycle)

2019-01-03 Thread Peter Elderson
First point: you are right and again, I am sorry. Second: What about the same question without the “easily”? Mvg Peter Elderson > Op 3 jan. 2019 om 13:10 heeft Richard Fairhurst het > volgende geschreven: > > Peter Elderson wrote: >> Sorry, I assumed Potlatch would work approximately similar

Re: [Tagging] Trailhead tagging

2019-01-03 Thread Marc Gemis
I wonder why it is under "highway", it seems more related to "tourism" / "information". Another problem I see is that there is no other definition for trailheads in The Netherlands than "location being picked by the tourist agency as trailhead" or better "location being designated by the tourist

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Hierarchies route=bicycle)

2019-01-03 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Peter Elderson wrote: > Sorry, I assumed Potlatch would work approximately similar to Id. If you're addressing a mailing list with 551 subscribers, could I suggest you take a few minutes to actually research your statements before posting? > Can it easily sort/reverse ways within relations,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Hierarchies route=bicycle)

2019-01-03 Thread Peter Elderson
Sorry, I assumed Potlatch would work approximately similar to Id. Can it easily sort/reverse ways within relations, move elements between relations, create and manipulate superroutes, and keep all the routes (hiking, cycling, PT) happy when removing/splitting/extending ways? Op do 3 jan. 2019 om

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Hierarchies route=bicycle)

2019-01-03 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Peter Elderson wrote: > I just did some work on a hierarchy of hiking routes. Can't be done with > Id or Potlatch What specifically can't be done in P2? Richard -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f5258744.html ___ Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Hierarchies route=bicycle)

2019-01-03 Thread Peter Elderson
I just did some work on a hierarchy of hiking routes. Can't be done with Id or Potlatch, the only available tool is JOSM and even with JOSM you'll have to do extra steps not to break things. Reverse is seldom a problem with hiking. Nevertheless, one iwn uses some sections of a national trail

Re: [Tagging] Trailhead tagging

2019-01-03 Thread Peter Elderson
Please note that the description of official TOPs in Nederland is not intended as a limitative requirement for trailheads around the globe. If we would mark every access point to a route as a trailhead, Nederland would be covered with trailheads, and nobody would have any use for the

Re: [Tagging] Trailhead tagging

2019-01-03 Thread Mark Wagner
On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 20:57:04 +0100 Peter Elderson wrote: > Copying from an earlier response: Designated starting point for > multiple routes into a nature area. There is a designed marking pole > or stele, information boards, seats or benches, free parking space > nearby. This one is in a small