Re: [Tagging] tagging a public waste incinerator complex

sent from a phone > On 13. Feb 2019, at 05:26, John Willis via Tagging > wrote: > > I tagged it as a waste transfer station & power generator (for consistency), > but I feel this is an error. if there isnt a power generator you should not tag it like one. Maybe we don’t have a common

[Tagging] tagging a public waste incinerator complex

TL;DR: OSM wiki says to tag incinerators as “power generators” - but what if they are old-style ones not used for power generation? How do you tag those? just use the same tags for consistency? ~~~ Where I live, most residential and commercial garbage is burned locally at incinerator

Re: [Tagging] Public Transport Timetables Proposal RFC

Jo, Leif, My sincerest apologies. I couldn't find a request to vote on this list's archives. Must have overlooked it. Tijmen On 11-02-19 22:51, Jo wrote: The proposal was voted upon. On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:54 PM Tijmen Stam > wrote: On 31-10-18

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - RFC - Power and pipeline substations functions

Hi Tony, Distinction between transported products is made with substance=* on pipelines directly. This can't be a substation property, since there can be lot of different products in different pipes. Electricity is like hydrocarbons You find AC or DC current/voltage, different voltages for

Re: [Tagging] Public Transport Timetables Proposal RFC

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 21:54, Tijmen Stam wrote: > > On January 3rd this year, Leif added the "Interval" and "duration" tags > to the wiki for bus route: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aroute%3Dbus=revision=1767271=1684316 > > I have sideways followed this discussion, but

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 7:49 AM Dave Swarthout wrote: > > The seamark definition in the supplied link is very general. I cannot see how > anyone could misinterpret this use of either waterway=fairway or > seamark:type=fairway unless they are specialists, in which case I'm sure a > response

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels

+1 I would even go for highway=fairway to route over an area, instead of the currently used invisible highway=path. Vr gr Peter Elderson Op di 12 feb. 2019 om 13:49 schreef Dave Swarthout : > The seamark definition in the supplied link is very general. I cannot see > how anyone could

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 113, Issue 51 Re: tree rows vs individual trees

Hi Just an addition to Peters lines, follow the link, https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/52.6446/5.6931 Each row is invalid marked as managed forest, yes the row is managed but just for residential use. Almost every farmyard has been surrounded by one or more rows of trees in this barren flat

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels

The seamark definition in the supplied link is very general. I cannot see how anyone could misinterpret this use of either waterway=fairway or seamark:type=fairway unless they are specialists, in which case I'm sure a response will be forthcoming. Regardless, I agree that the conflict note should

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels

Sorry to bring this back so much time later. I just want to confirm a detail. On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:34 AM Multi Modaal wrote: > > I could go along with the extension of the definition of waterway=canal to > > cover also navigation channels in larger bodies of water, if this solution > > is

Re: [Tagging] tree rows vs individual trees

It's an existing issue. https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1753 Vr gr Peter Elderson Op di 12 feb. 2019 om 12:36 schreef Joseph Eisenberg < joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>: > > Better rendering of tree_row on OSM Carto > > Please go to

Re: [Tagging] tree rows vs individual trees

> Better rendering of tree_row on OSM Carto Please go to http://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/new and explain the problems with the current rendering, then we can discuss how to fix it. On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 6:43 PM Peter Elderson wrote: > Netherlands have very extensive

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - RFC - Power and pipeline substations functions

Hi I am not at all clear from this as to how to tag a natural gas pipeline and the various equipments at substations, or water or liquid hydrocarbons eg aviation fuel. Is a product tag needed? The assumption is electricity (IEC 601 is purely electricity) but what about other stuff 

Re: [Tagging] tree rows vs individual trees

Netherlands have very extensive use of tree rows. Lets take the roads. Roads in our polders are almost always lined with tree rows, exept for the many crossings, roundabouts, tunnels, bridges etcetera. These roads stretch many kilometers. The lining is often not singular, but lines each direction