Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

On 12/07/19 21:00, Florian Lohoff wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 07:23:01AM +0200, Pee Wee wrote: Hi all I would like your opinion on the next issue. meaning on may 3, 2010 when someone added a description of “Garden” from the Wikipedia garden description that refers to private gardens. In

Re: [Tagging] track smoothness/quality

https://www.dropbox.com/s/agj4njek1r35vnz/2018-10-03-13.06.54r.jpg?dl=0 seems to fit well - there are solid parts but it is not making track more usable and were not added with that purpose (and probably not added by

Re: [Tagging] track smoothness/quality

9 Jul 2019, 20:07 by kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 1:12 PM Mateusz Konieczny > wrote: > >> Can you link image of track >> on rock/rocky surface where tagging >> it as grade1, grade2, grade3 would >> be misleading? >> > > I'd have an easier time driving this grade5 (at

[Tagging] How owing to FlightRadar24 to follow the Tour de France on a less straight route

Comment avec FlightRadar24 suivre les avions plutôt que les vélos du Tour de France. How owing to FlightRadar24 to follow the Tour de France on a route less straight than that of the bikes and than OSM's. You may right click the video and select

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 10:51, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/07/19 19:02, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > > Public toilet: amenity=toilets > Private toilet: not tagged (so not tagged > like a public one) > > I am unable to link to well tagged private > toilets as in this case private

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 07:23:01AM +0200, Pee Wee wrote: > Hi all > I would like your opinion on the next issue. > meaning on may 3, 2010 when someone added a description of “Garden” from > the Wikipedia garden description that refers to private gardens. In order > to differentiate from the

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

12 Jul 2019, 11:50 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > On 12/07/19 19:02, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >> >> >> >> 12 Jul 2019, 10:11 by >> 61sundow...@gmail.com >> >> : >> >>> On 12/07/19 17:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>> sent from a phone

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

On 12/07/19 19:02, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: 12 Jul 2019, 10:11 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: On 12/07/19 17:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 12. Jul 2019, at 09:12, Marc Gemis wrote: Why would a private garden require a

Re: [Tagging] shop=window(s) incorrectly deprecated in favor of craft=window_construction ?

11 Jul 2019, 21:33 by geodes...@gmail.com: > > The obvious tag is > > shop=trade > >  and > >  trade= ???  ... > > The most obvious tagging scheme for a world wide database like OSM would be > to use the commercial classification system in effect in a particular > jurisdiction. > It is

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

12 Jul 2019, 10:11 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > On 12/07/19 17:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> >> sent from a phone >> >>> On 12. Jul 2019, at 09:12, Marc Gemis wrote: >>> >>> Why would a private garden require a different key? Do we tag a >>> private wood / forest in a different way than

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 08:13, Marc Gemis wrote: > > Why would a private garden require a different key? Indeed. A private garden is often used for leisure and is a garden. One might perhaps argue for different tagging to describe a private garden used for growing vegetables and which the

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

On 12/07/19 17:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 12. Jul 2019, at 09:12, Marc Gemis wrote: Why would a private garden require a different key? Do we tag a private wood / forest in a different way than one that is accessible by the public? Do private parking lots get a

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

sent from a phone > On 12. Jul 2019, at 09:12, Marc Gemis wrote: > > Why would a private garden require a different key? Do we tag a > private wood / forest in a different way than one that is accessible > by the public? Do private parking lots get a different amenity-key ? > No, we refine

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

I'm fine with leisure=garden for private/common/public gardens Vr gr Peter Elderson Op vr 12 jul. 2019 om 07:24 schreef Pee Wee : > Hi all > > > I would like your opinion on the next issue. > > > On the Dutch forum (googletranslate >

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 8:50 AM Pee Wee wrote: > > I understand but numbers don't always say much. A great part of this number > is caused by an (afaik undocumentend and highly arbitrary) import in the > city of Tilburg > and how many private, residential gardens are mapped (around the

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

I understand but numbers don't always say much. A great part of this number is caused by an (afaik undocumentend and highly arbitrary) import in the city of Tilburg Cheers Peter Op vr 12 jul. 2019 om 08:18 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com>:

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

sent from a phone > On 12. Jul 2019, at 07:23, Pee Wee wrote: > > It seems to me that OSM leisure=garden wiki changed meaning on may 3, 2010 > when someone added a description of “Garden” from the Wikipedia garden > description that refers to private gardens Frankly, I believe it is too