That should likely be FTEs (full time equivalents), not that I believe
this is something that should actually be in OSM (what about wikidata?).
Am 02.08.2019 um 08:08 schrieb Rory McCann:
> On 01/08/2019 22:17, Mhairi O'Hara wrote:
>> Voting is now open for the proposed feature staff_count:nurses
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 11:12 AM Peter Elderson wrote:
>
> We're on the same page. The pavement and separations argument just
> illustrates how local authorities may make the same distinction, and try to
> regulate traffic and safety informally. So here, I can use this for the
> classification,
We're on the same page. The pavement and separations argument just
illustrates how local authorities may make the same distinction, and try to
regulate traffic and safety informally. So here, I can use this for the
classification, but in the next town it would probably not work.
Vr gr Peter Elders
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 14:51, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> +1, historically (say pre-1960ies, I’m not old enough to tell from own
> experience and may be wrong) you wouldn’t have found pavements in German
> hamlets and villages (or likely anywhere in the countryside), and although
> most will ha
sent from a phone
> On 8. Aug 2019, at 13:41, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Except I wouldn't let the pavements, greenery, trees, etc. influence
> me. If the main function is getting through the village then it's a through
> road even though
> it has houses that are barely separated from the road an
sent from a phone
> On 7. Aug 2019, at 21:36, Morten Lange via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> I wonder how I should tag bicycle shops that are not shops in the traditional
> "buy our products" sense.
around here this is also a common phenomenon, I am not sure whether they are
all tagged the same, s
Le 07.08.19 à 21:36, Morten Lange via Tagging a écrit :
> I wonder how I should tag bicycle shops that are not shops in the
> traditional "buy our products" sense.
one area for the community center
one node inside this area for the shop
> community_centre=bicycle_maintenance
this only make sens
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 12:18, Peter Elderson wrote:
> To be practical, I think I will retag the clearly residential roads now
> tagged as 'unclassified' in my town, to 'residential'. Some roads are now
> tagged as residential, but the main function is getting through the
> village. These tend to g
To be practical, I think I will retag the clearly residential roads now
tagged as 'unclassified' in my town, to 'residential'. Some roads are now
tagged as residential, but the main function is getting through the
village. These tend to give access to housing as well, but houses are
separated from
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 03:18, Michael Tsang wrote:
If the "primary purpose" of the road is through traffic, and the "driving
> experience" is like on a major road (e.g. straight, fast, no obstruction,
> no
> give way, etc.), that part of the road is still red / pink.
>
> However, if that road is b
10 matches
Mail list logo