Re: [Tagging] emergency=no on hospitals is ambiguous

2019-11-03 Thread Francesco Ansanelli
Il dom 3 nov 2019, 15:49 Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > what about specific emergency departments, e.g. a gynecological hospital > which has an emergency department for gynecological emergencies only? > How about to mention it as healthcare speciality? healthcare:speciality

Re: [Tagging] emergency=no on hospitals is ambiguous

2019-11-03 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
what about specific emergency departments, e.g. a gynecological hospital which has an emergency department for gynecological emergencies only? Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Pedestrian lane

2019-11-03 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 3 nov 2019, alle ore 09:59, Jan Michel ha > scritto: > > This depends on legislature. In Germany, on normal streets (not on motorways) > the shoulder is not only for emergency use and pedestrians, but also for all > slower vehicles. These should drive there to

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Pedestrian lane

2019-11-03 Thread Markus
On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 at 20:37, Clifford Snow wrote: > > I like your proposal but think it needs to clarify the difference between a > pedestrian lane and a shoulder [1]. In the US, most (many?) states allow > pedestrians to walk on shoulders if there is no sidewalk/footway, with the > exception

Re: [Tagging] emergency=no on hospitals is ambiguous

2019-11-03 Thread Francesco Ansanelli
Il dom 3 nov 2019, 11:19 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > On 03/11/19 18:51, Francesco Ansanelli wrote: > > Hello list, > > I don't know is anybody wrote about this before, but I have noticed that > the emergency tag changes meaning on hospitals and the result is weird: > emergency tag

Re: [Tagging] emergency=no on hospitals is ambiguous

2019-11-03 Thread Warin
On 03/11/19 18:51, Francesco Ansanelli wrote: Hello list, I don't know is anybody wrote about this before, but I have noticed that the emergency tag changes meaning on hospitals and the result is weird: emergency tag indicate whether an emergency vehicle has access to the way/point, but on

Re: [Tagging] emergency=no on hospitals is ambiguous

2019-11-03 Thread Francesco Ansanelli
Il dom 3 nov 2019, 10:22 Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > > > sent from a phone > > Il giorno 3 nov 2019, alle ore 09:13, Jo ha scritto: > > the confusion is that emergency may refer to rooms, but usually in > OpenStreetMap it refers to access for emergency vehicles. > > > > actually emergency

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Pedestrian lane

2019-11-03 Thread Jan Michel
On 03.11.19 08:19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Il giorno 2 nov 2019, alle ore 20:37, Clifford Snow ha scritto: I like your proposal but think it needs to clarify the difference between a pedestrian lane and a shoulder [1]. In the US, most (many?) states allow pedestrians to walk on shoulders

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Pedestrian lane

2019-11-03 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
The only pedestrian lane that I know, in my German hometown, is separated from the rest of the road by a solid line. So it's not legal for vehicles to drive on it. MichaelĀ  Am So., Nov. 3, 2019 at 8:20 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: sent from a phone > Il giorno 2 nov 2019, alle ore

Re: [Tagging] emergency=no on hospitals is ambiguous

2019-11-03 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 3 nov 2019, alle ore 09:13, Jo ha scritto: > > the confusion is that emergency may refer to rooms, but usually in > OpenStreetMap it refers to access for emergency vehicles. actually emergency is a well defined key for emergency vehicle access AND for

Re: [Tagging] emergency=no on hospitals is ambiguous

2019-11-03 Thread Jo
the confusion is that emergency may refer to rooms, but usually in OpenStreetMap it refers to access for emergency vehicles. On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 8:58 AM Andrew Errington wrote: > We have a local hospital. It is tiny and has no emergency room. > > Andrew > > On 03/11/2019, Francesco Ansanelli

Re: [Tagging] emergency=no on hospitals is ambiguous

2019-11-03 Thread Francesco Ansanelli
Hi Andrew, Then you have to put emergency=no according to the wiki... Let me know if your editor implement it right Francesco Il dom 3 nov 2019, 08:58 Andrew Errington ha scritto: > We have a local hospital. It is tiny and has no emergency room. > > Andrew > > On 03/11/2019, Francesco

Re: [Tagging] emergency=no on hospitals is ambiguous

2019-11-03 Thread Andrew Errington
We have a local hospital. It is tiny and has no emergency room. Andrew On 03/11/2019, Francesco Ansanelli wrote: > Hello list, > > I don't know is anybody wrote about this before, but I have noticed that > the emergency tag changes meaning on hospitals and the result is weird: > emergency tag

[Tagging] emergency=no on hospitals is ambiguous

2019-11-03 Thread Francesco Ansanelli
Hello list, I don't know is anybody wrote about this before, but I have noticed that the emergency tag changes meaning on hospitals and the result is weird: emergency tag indicate whether an emergency vehicle has access to the way/point, but on hospitals his value is about emergency rooms. I

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Pedestrian lane

2019-11-03 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 2 nov 2019, alle ore 20:37, Clifford Snow > ha scritto: > > I like your proposal but think it needs to clarify the difference between a > pedestrian lane and a shoulder [1]. In the US, most (many?) states allow > pedestrians to walk on shoulders if there is no