Re: [Tagging] Additional detail of Levee mapping via embankments

2019-11-14 Thread John Willis via Tagging
The “reply-to” email address might be being secretly changed by some mail clients - when I choose “reply” to Peter’s mail, it chooses the tagging group. When I choose reply to Martin’s, it chooses Martin. This is Mail.app on MacOS 10.13.6. I have never really had this issue before. I don’t thi

Re: [Tagging] disguised communication towers

2019-11-14 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 14. Nov 2019, at 22:04, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don not understand what a "a dome covered guyed lattice tower" is was thinking about something like this with guy wires: https://images.freeimages.com/images/large-previews/9f3/radome-1522847.jpg Cheers

Re: [Tagging] disguised communication towers

2019-11-14 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 07:04, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don not understand what a "a dome covered guyed lattice tower" is. Could > be a lattice tower inside a large dome? In which case I would expect the > dome to be one feature and the tower another feature inside OSM, there > wo

Re: [Tagging] disguised communication towers

2019-11-14 Thread Warin
On 15/11/19 00:55, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Am Do., 14. Nov. 2019 um 11:01 Uhr schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com >: > tower:construction seems a tag that describes different orthogonal properties according to the mostly used values. Some describe a

Re: [Tagging] disguised communication towers

2019-11-14 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Do., 14. Nov. 2019 um 11:01 Uhr schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > tower:construction seems a tag that describes different orthogonal > properties according to the mostly used values. Some describe a structural > system (eg. lattice, guyed lattice, tube), others a shape (e.g. dish, > do

Re: [Tagging] Additional detail of Levee mapping via embankments

2019-11-14 Thread Peter Elderson
Messages are sent with Reply-To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" So simple reply should be enough, that's what I do and it works. Fr gr Peter Elderson Op do 14 nov. 2019 om 11:46 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 14. Nov 2019,

Re: [Tagging] Additional detail of Levee mapping via embankments

2019-11-14 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 14. Nov 2019, at 04:08, John Willis via Tagging > wrote: > > Sorry, I am continuing to have trouble properly replying to the tagging > group, it keeps defaulting to the individual. you have to “reply to all” @list-admin maybe this setting could be changed? Replying

Re: [Tagging] disguised communication towers

2019-11-14 Thread Warin
On 14/11/19 09:00, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 13. Nov 2019, at 22:02, Eric Theise wrote: From my morning reading it seems that entities tagged with tower:type=communication tower:construction=concealed and either man_made=mast or man_made=tower should cough up c