Re: [Tagging] Cycle boxes for two-stage left turns

2020-01-08 Thread Jarek Piórkowski
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 08:03, marc marc wrote: > Le 08.01.20 à 05:10, Marc Gemis a écrit : > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 10:30 PM marc marc wrote: > >> keep it simple ! > >> advanced stop box only use a cycleway=asl without relation > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dasl > >> a

Re: [Tagging] Cycle boxes for two-stage left turns

2020-01-08 Thread Jarek Piórkowski
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 10:00, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 7:06 PM Jarek Piórkowski wrote: >> I'm looking for a way to tag designated areas where cyclists wait to >> safely make a far turn (in right-hand-drive regions, a left turn). >> I'll call them "left turn boxes" for short

Re: [Tagging] How to tag oneway restriction applying to pedestrians?

2020-01-08 Thread Jarek Piórkowski
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 16:33, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > Although unusual, oneway on pedestrian highways (path, footway, track) is > possible in some places. > > Cases of oneway pedestrian traffic includes some hiking trails, border > crossing, > exit-only passages and more. > > How to tag this?

Re: [Tagging] surface=block_paved, or surface=paved + paving=block

2020-01-08 Thread Fernando Trebien
From the key:surface article: - surface=paved: "This value gives only a rough description; use a more precise value if possible." - surface=paving_stones: "A relatively smooth surface paved with artificial blocks (block pavers, bricks) or natural stones (flagstones), with a flat top. The gaps

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Overhead lines management (consecutive to line_attachment)

2020-01-08 Thread François Lacombe
Hi all, This proposal is still in RFC and may be voted in a couple of weeks as evaluation shown no issue so far, at least on transmission power lines. line_management tag is used carefully for testing. Read more : https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/InfosReseaux/diary/391058 Nevertheless it's an

Re: [Tagging] amenity=tourist_bus_parking

2020-01-08 Thread Volker Schmidt
It is not unusual to have one parking area with one name with dedicated areas for different vehicle categories. I cannot use amenity=parking for both the entire parking area and the vehicle-type-specific "sub"-areas, at least JOSM does complain when you do that. We could ignore that and use nested

Re: [Tagging] surface=block_paved, or surface=paved + paving=block

2020-01-08 Thread Paul Allen
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 23:06, marc marc wrote: > why it isn't a paving_stones ? the max height ? > Shape and size. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brick#Optimal_dimensions,_characteristics,_and_strength I ask myself how and how many mappers 'll see a diff. > Any who have ever laid bricks, or

Re: [Tagging] surface=block_paved, or surface=paved + paving=block

2020-01-08 Thread marc marc
why it isn't a paving_stones ? the max height ? I ask myself how and how many mappers 'll see a diff. Le 08.01.20 à 22:36, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > Is following picture > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Paving_being_laid_arp.jpg > depicting construction of surface=paving_stones? > >

Re: [Tagging] surface=block_paved, or surface=paved + paving=block

2020-01-08 Thread Philip Barnes
On Thu, 2020-01-09 at 07:15 +0900, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > The picture shows clay bricks being laid as paving for a service > road, in a herringbone pattern. > > Perhaps this should be surface=brick/bricks? Both are used a few > thousand times. > That is definitely block paving, not bricks.

Re: [Tagging] surface=block_paved, or surface=paved + paving=block

2020-01-08 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
The picture shows clay bricks being laid as paving for a service road, in a herringbone pattern. Perhaps this should be surface=brick/bricks? Both are used a few thousand times. - Joseph Eisenberg On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:37 AM Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > Is following picture >

Re: [Tagging] How to tag oneway restriction applying to pedestrians?

2020-01-08 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Mi., 8. Jan. 2020 um 22:35 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny < matkoni...@tutanota.com>: > But sometimes it is used on paths and footways to indicate that such way is > oneway for pedestrians (especially in cases where only pedestrians are > allowed) > to use it. > I'd put it like this: "with

[Tagging] surface=block_paved, or surface=paved + paving=block

2020-01-08 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
Is following picture https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Paving_being_laid_arp.jpg depicting construction of surface=paving_stones? Or is it incorrect to tag in this way and surface=block_paved, or surface=paved + paving=block should be considered as preferable? Posted to look for more

[Tagging] How to tag oneway restriction applying to pedestrians?

2020-01-08 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
Although unusual, oneway on pedestrian highways (path, footway, track) is possible in some places. Cases of oneway pedestrian traffic includes some hiking trails, border crossing, exit-only passages and more. How to tag this? oneway=yes is currently described on OSM Wiki as applying only to

Re: [Tagging] recreational vs functional routes

2020-01-08 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 1:23 PM joost schouppe wrote: > Especially for car routes, I haven't seen any way to tag touristic routes > for driving cars, like the Turist Veger in Norway or the Route des Cols in > France. It is also of specific interest for cycling. For example, in > Belgium we have a

Re: [Tagging] Cycle boxes for two-stage left turns

2020-01-08 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 7:06 PM Jarek Piórkowski wrote: > Hello, > > I'm looking for a way to tag designated areas where cyclists wait to > safely make a far turn (in right-hand-drive regions, a left turn). > I'll call them "left turn boxes" for short though pointers to a better > name would be

Re: [Tagging] amenity=tourist_bus_parking

2020-01-08 Thread John Willis via Tagging
If I have a sign that says all cars go here, and all HGV goes over there, and one is painted for 1000 car spots and one has 50 giant bus spots, those are designated lots. I have used parking_space when I have found A lone disabled space - but a group of 50 spots for busses is a bus lot. At

Re: [Tagging] amenity=tourist_bus_parking

2020-01-08 Thread John Willis via Tagging
> On Jan 7, 2020, at 3:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > For a municipal tourist bus parking, who is "customers" referring to? > Customers of what? Tollway service area lots inside the toll area are “customers” of nexco, the operators. There are “permissive” lots outside the toll

Re: [Tagging] Cycle boxes for two-stage left turns

2020-01-08 Thread marc marc
Le 08.01.20 à 05:10, Marc Gemis a écrit : > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 10:30 PM marc marc wrote: >> >> Le 06.01.20 à 04:19, Jarek Piórkowski a écrit : >>> Comments most welcome! >> >> keep it simple ! >> advanced stop box only use a cycleway=asl without relation >>

Re: [Tagging] amenity=tourist_bus_parking

2020-01-08 Thread Andy Townsend
On 08/01/2020 10:14, Volker Schmidt wrote: What about going back to the wiki and make use of the fact that amenity=parking_space can be used for this. Make separate parking space areas for different vehicle types. Add parking

Re: [Tagging] amenity=tourist_bus_parking

2020-01-08 Thread Volker Schmidt
What about going back to the wiki and make use of the fact that amenity=parking_space can be used for this. Make separate parking space areas for different vehicle types. Add parking entrances