> amenity=reverse_vending_machine
> reverse_vending=bottle_return
>
> Machines may take more than one type of item. Some here take bottles and
> bottle creates. Some take metal cans.
>
> Reverse vending machines are not the only vending machine type that’s not
> technically a vending machine,
On 1/10/20 00:04, Marc Gemis wrote:
> Perhaps I was not clear, what was pointed out is that it is sufficient
> to have the address on the building, there is no need to repeat it on
> the POI (besides the parts that are different such as unit_nr or
> floor).
A lot of retail buildings here are set
Perhaps I was not clear, what was pointed out is that it is sufficient
to have the address on the building, there is no need to repeat it on
the POI (besides the parts that are different such as unit_nr or
floor).
Although I now think that person said that it would be OK to have the
address on a
On 1/9/20 22:54, Marc Gemis wrote:
> Recently someone told me that addresses are not important for POIs,
> and perhaps he was right.
> Suppose I want to navigate to a particular shop in that mall. I tell
> the router I need to go to that shop. If the point of that shop is
> properly mapped and all
Recently someone told me that addresses are not important for POIs,
and perhaps he was right.
Suppose I want to navigate to a particular shop in that mall. I tell
the router I need to go to that shop. If the point of that shop is
properly mapped and all footways from the parking and indoor
I assume those characteristics are mapped on the OSM-ways representing
the roads, not on the relation.
As far as I understand Peter's arguments, the fact that a bicycle
route is suitable for recreation, commuting, skilled MTB'ers and so
on, should be determined from the characteristics of the
On 09/01/2020 23:14, Peter Elderson wrote:
Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven
I think;
Those who bicycle know why there needs to be these classes.
Those who don't ride a bicycle regularly see no need for these classes.
I wonder which of these groups you think I am in...
Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven
> I think;
> Those who bicycle know why there needs to be these classes.
> Those who don't ride a bicycle regularly see no need for these classes.
I wonder which of these groups you think I am in...
Hint: Nederland.
> For those that see
Le 06.01.20 à 08:47, Florian Lohoff a écrit :
> If you have HUGE Buildings i use a node with an address.
it's amazing the difference in usage.
I find that addr nodes are very problematic for hudge buildings like
shopping malls or train stations. the localisation of the node forces
the routing to
I think;
Those who bicycle know why there needs to be these classes.
Those who don't ride a bicycle regularly see no need for these classes.
For those that see no need for these classes .. what harm will they do
to the data base?
I am ignoring the 'verification' argument for the time being.
> You don't need signpost to have a route.
I disagree. If there is nothing on the ground, there is no mappable route.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/36.31737/139.61884
Here is a good example of the kind of situations I have in my area:
- a service area with two different lots, car and HGV (bus/lorry) adjacent to
each other, with a satellite bathroom for the busses.
- service area is segregated by
On 1/7/20 4:18 PM, marc marc wrote:
> Le 07.01.20 à 20:58, Richard Welty a écrit :
>> a profound lack of interest
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Relations/Proposed/Circuit
>
> maybe it's due to the funny url for a propal
> moving it at the right place may help
so i looked over the
Le jeu. 9 janv. 2020 à 22:05, Peter Elderson a écrit :
>
> Florimond Berthoux het volgende geschreven:
>
> Ok, you need examples :
> this Eurovelo 3 is for tourism
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9351172#map=12/48.8454/2.4130=C
> this REVe Nord-Sud is for commute/every day cycling
>
Florimond Berthoux het volgende geschreven:
>
>
> Ok, you need examples :
> this Eurovelo 3 is for tourism
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9351172#map=12/48.8454/2.4130=C
> this REVe Nord-Sud is for commute/every day cycling
>
On 09/01/2020 20:17, Volker Schmidt wrote:
oneway=yes|no needs indeed be applicable to vehicles only,
That tag on footways would apply only to walkers.
DaveF
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Ok, you need examples :
this Eurovelo 3 is for tourism
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9351172#map=12/48.8454/2.4130=C
this REVe Nord-Sud is for commute/every day cycling
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8664006#map=14/48.8784/2.3599=C
as you can see in this video
I don't see why it's not a type=route route=bicycle. Bicycle routes do not
have to be exclusive or any particular type of road, just signposted as a
bicycle route. You can tag extra attributes of course.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op do 9 jan. 2020 om 21:15 schreef Richard Fairhurst :
> Joost
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/give_box
A small facility where people drop off and pick up various types of items in
the sense of free sharing.
Hi
Thank you for your inputs to improve this documentation and make it easy to
understand what this tag is all about. I have
oneway=yes|no needs indeed be applicable to vehicles only, for very
practical reasons: otherwise we would have a massive problem with all
one-way streets without separately mapped sidewalks.
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, 02:16 Jarek Piórkowski, wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 16:33, Mateusz Konieczny
>
Joost Schouppe wrote:
> In the case of cycling, it would be really useful
> for routers to be able to differentiate.
Yes - with my cycle.travel hat on, I'd find this very useful. Just an
optional route_type= tag on the relation would help.
I've mentioned on here a couple of times before [1]
waymarked mtb routes are tagged route=mtb on the relation
waymarked cycling routes are tagged route=bicycle on the relation.
I don't know how I could verify that a cycling route is either touristic or
for commute/everyday cycling or both. Even if advertised as touristic it
can be used for
//wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space> can be
> used for this.
> Make separate parking space areas for different vehicle types.
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/
Am Do., 9. Jan. 2020 um 10:41 Uhr schrieb Florimond Berthoux <
florimond.berth...@gmail.com>:
> tourism=yes : if the cycle route is a touristic purpose route
> commute=yes : if it's a route for commute and every day cycling
>
where do you get this information from? Is it verifiable?
>
Hi,
I would like also to be able to map four kind of cycle routes : touristic,
commuting, road bike, mountain bike (mtb).
Today we can map mtb and general cycling route (most of them are touristic
though not limited to them).
But unfortunately mtb and cycling routes are split in two kinds of
25 matches
Mail list logo
