sent from a phone
> On 29. Mar 2020, at 01:56, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
(times square)
> But is that a place=square? That is simply an intersection which is
> called square. There is no hard-surfaced area for people separate frrom
> the roads.
But there’s an architectural staging /
sent from a phone
> On 28. Mar 2020, at 01:07, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> I think you are saying that the open, typically hard-surfaced, typically
> square area that is typically contained within roadways, is exactly the
> square. That one should draw a way around that area, such that no roads
>
Paul Allen writes:
> I can think of one US city square which has "square" in the name
> (not square shaped, though) that is rather well-known. If you
> can't think of it the ball will drop eventually, at midnight on Dec 31st.
But is that a place=square? That is simply an intersection which is
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 7:17 PM Paul Johnson wrote:
>> I fully understand the difficulty with rendering only from route
>> relations. I maintain a renderer that does it. It still needs some
>> serious programming if it is to scale to handle minutely updates
>> against the planet. The project
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 5:45 PM Kevin Kenny wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 5:57 PM Richard Fairhurst
> wrote:
>
> > Sure. NCN 4 is called "NCN 4" in the same sense that the M4 is called the
> > "M4". That's fine - plenty of people refer to it that way. But OSM
> > convention, dating back
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 5:57 PM Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Sure. NCN 4 is called "NCN 4" in the same sense that the M4 is called the
> "M4". That's fine - plenty of people refer to it that way. But OSM
> convention, dating back 15ish years, is that in situations like this, you
> put the number
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 5:29 PM Peter Neale via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Like Dave, I am not sure that I see a huge issue with a name and a
> reference duplicating each other (or at least overlapping).
>
> Names and References are essentially doing the same job; they identify
Like Dave, I am not sure that I see a huge issue with a name and a reference
duplicating each other (or at least overlapping).
Names and References are essentially doing the same job; they identify
"things"; they are proper nouns.
We probably expect a name to be a word (or words) and a reference
On 29/3/20 8:18 am, Clifford Snow wrote:
Richard - and anyone else who can help.
Can someone help with an overpass query to find problem route
relations? I'm happy to help fix, but my overpass skills are, well to
put it bluntly, not worth shit:-)
You are not alone.
However looking at
Dave Fox wrote:
> I'm not sure I'm seeing the problem. What /is/ the "actual" name
> for UK cycle routes?
> NCN 4 is named as National Cycle Network Route 4 as that's what
> Sustran call it.
> I'm not convinced names & refs *have* to be mutually exclusive.
Sure. NCN 4 is called "NCN 4" in the
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 3:39 PM Peter Elderson wrote:
>
> Richard Fairhurst::
>
>> If you need somewhere for a mapper-facing route description (and I can
>> see that you need that for “part United Kingdom 5”), then I guess the
>> obvious place to put that is the note= tag. But let’s keep it out
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 10:10:58PM +0100, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> On 28.03.2020 12:45, ael wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:58:00PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > > Piccadilly Circus (note the different word).
> > > Is this a town square for British people? I notice the English WP seems
Richard - and anyone else who can help.
Can someone help with an overpass query to find problem route relations?
I'm happy to help fix, but my overpass skills are, well to put it bluntly,
not worth shit:-)
Thanks,
Clifford
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:18 AM Richard Fairhurst
wrote:
> Hello
On 28.03.2020 12:45, ael wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:58:00PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Piccadilly Circus (note the different word).
Is this a town square for British people? I notice the English WP seems to
avoid the word square (although it then calls it a plaza), while both,
Richard Fairhurst::
> If you need somewhere for a mapper-facing route description (and I can see
> that you need that for “part United Kingdom 5”), then I guess the obvious
> place to put that is the note= tag. But let’s keep it out of the name tag;
> and let’s have a concerted effort to remove
On 28/03/2020 19:16, Cascafico Giovanni wrote:
Well, if somebody takes care of rendering [1] OSM data structure,
situation doesn't look so bad.
[1] https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#routelist?map=10!54.7983!-1.3075
Not really - that's just ignoring names on the main map and showing
On 28/03/2020 18:18, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Hello folks,
Route relation names aren’t in a great state, are they?
Let’s say that I want to render cycle route names on a map (because, well, I
do). I zoom in on a way along the East Coast of Britain and I find it’s a
member of this route:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 2:30 PM Andrew Hain
wrote:
> Proposal for QA tools: flag anything with the same number in the name and
> ref.
>
So much this. I see this a lot and had to fix a bit of that when I was
doing I 405 work. "Interstate 405" is *not* a name and shouldn't be
there...
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 1:18 PM Richard Fairhurst
wrote:
> A modest proposal: let’s use the name= tag in route relations for route
> names. Let’s use the ref= tag for route numbers. If it doesn’t have a name,
> it shouldn’t have a name= tag. Same as we do everywhere else.
>
I'm OK with this.
Proposal for QA tools: flag anything with the same number in the name and ref.
--
Andrew
From: Richard Fairhurst
Sent: 28 March 2020 18:18
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: [Tagging] Route names that aren’t names
Hello folks,
Route
Il giorno sab 28 mar 2020 alle ore 19:19 Richard Fairhurst <
rich...@systemed.net> ha scritto:
>
> Hello folks,
> Route relation names aren’t in a great state, are they?
>
> The upshot: bad luck if you want to render the actual names of routes on
a map. You can’t.
Well, if somebody takes care of
Hello folks,
Route relation names aren’t in a great state, are they?
Let’s say that I want to render cycle route names on a map (because, well, I
do). I zoom in on a way along the East Coast of Britain and I find it’s a
member of this route:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9579
I think we need different tags for pharmacies for humans and pharmacies
that are exclusively veterinary, for a very simple reason, that is to avoid
having the ambiguity when a place is tagged only as pharmacy without
veterinary yes/no (or equivalent)
On Sat, 28 Mar 2020, 14:41 Paul Allen,
On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 at 09:47, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28/3/20 7:51 pm, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> sent from a phone
>
> On 28. Mar 2020, at 08:31, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>
> <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> veterinary medical supplies, how to choose what amenity?
>
>
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:58:00PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> to give an example of an object which I would call a square (maybe not in
> English): https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.50997/-0.13430
>
> Piccadilly Circus (note the different word).
> Is this a town square for
On 28/3/20 7:51 pm, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 28. Mar 2020, at 08:31, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
veterinary medical supplies, how to choose what amenity?
<#>
On 28/3/20 6:12 pm, Francesco Ansanelli wrote:
Hello,
I have a question about this tag:
sent from a phone
> On 28. Mar 2020, at 08:31, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> veterinary medical supplies, how to choose what amenity?
>
>
>
> Map both as separate nodes.
but it’s the same shop.
Cheers Martin ___
Tagging mailing
On 28/3/20 6:12 pm, Francesco Ansanelli wrote:
Hello,
I have a question about this tag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dveterinary_pharmacy
It's not much adopted and in unknown status. Should we use it?
Some pharmacies also sells veterinary medical supplies, how to choose
Hello,
I have a question about this tag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dveterinary_pharmacy
It's not much adopted and in unknown status. Should we use it?
Some pharmacies also sells veterinary medical supplies, how to choose what
amenity?
Is it possible to use a veterinary=*
在 2020年3月27日週五 21:05,Paul Allen 寫道:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 12:31, Simon Poole wrote:
>
>> Pretending that they do isn't a useful concept and yes they typically
>> won't have transliterations either.
>>
> I'm not pretending the street I'm on has a name in Mandarin. But the
> country I'm in
30 matches
Mail list logo