Sorry if this appears twice - I got a bounce message first time.
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op wo 1 apr. 2020 om 12:50 schreef Peter Elderson :
> Suggestion for rendering:
>
> What about osmc:name=*
>
> I know, doesn't exist, but it's a logical companion of osmc:symbol.
>
> Definition would be: name
> You are proposing to abandon the distinction between playgrounds and
implicit features on them (properties) and things on a playground
(explicitly mapped playground equipment as a feature).
Not really, playground equipment (tagged with 'playground:') on a
feature tagged with its main tag 'leisur
Suggestion for rendering:
What about osmc:name=*
I know, doesn't exist, but it's a logical companion of osmc:symbol.
Definition would be: name to show on the map.
Definition should be: just the simple name as found in the field, or the
nae ecerybody knows and uses, no extra's.
As with osmc:symb
Yves wrote:
> Inevitably, the current situation is stained by the abilities of the
> actual renderer, and the other way around. Maybe those renderers
> should sit around a wiki page and document how ideal tag could be
> and how they can be used in rendering, also taking into account
> the abili