sent from a phone
> On 27. Jun 2020, at 23:16, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
>
> I wish you much luck convincing iD not to apply its presets ("upgrade tags")
> for those Starbucks locations that don't have seating.
we are not discussing iD presets on this list, it is about tagging.
Cheers Marti
Don't know if it's only an Aussie thing (yet again! :-)), but we have (at
least) one franchise of shops called Boost Juice
https://www.boostjuice.com.au/, which only serve varieties of fruit juice &
smoothies.
Every one of them that I have seen are kiosks inside shopping centres, with
no seating p
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 23:07, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
>
> And then someone comes round and "upgrades tags" to match iD brand presets
> :)
>
Ah.
The actual problem (last time I tried upgrading tags with iD) is that it
doesn't
tell you what it's going to change, it doesn't tell you what it has
ch
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020, 17:52 Paul Allen, wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 22:16, Jarek Piórkowski
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I wish you much luck convincing iD not to apply its presets ("upgrade
>> tags") for those Starbucks locations that don't have seating. I tried
>> insisting on tagging a local location
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 22:16, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
>
> I wish you much luck convincing iD not to apply its presets ("upgrade
> tags") for those Starbucks locations that don't have seating. I tried
> insisting on tagging a local location's actual posted name ("Starbucks
> Coffee") and lost badl
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020, 11:10 Martin Koppenhoefer,
wrote:
>
> > On 27. Jun 2020, at 16:59, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> >
> > Even if it [a Starbucks location]
> > was just a kiosk I would still tag amenity=cafe for consistency.
>
>
> if it were just a kiosk you should not tag it as amenity=cafe, exact
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 19:56, Cj Malone <
me-osm-tagg...@keepawayfromfire.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-06-27 at 17:15 +0100, Paul Allen wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 17:03, 德泉 談 via Tagging
> > wrote:
> >
> > > In previous discussion we haven’t clarify that “cafe” is a place
> > > serving cof
On Sat, 2020-06-27 at 19:54 +0100, Cj Malone wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-06-27 at 17:15 +0100, Paul Allen wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 17:03, 德泉 談 via Tagging
> > wrote:
> >
> > > In previous discussion we haven’t clarify that “cafe” is a place
> > > serving coffee drinks
> > > or
> > > a place p
On Sat, 2020-06-27 at 17:15 +0100, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 17:03, 德泉 談 via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> > In previous discussion we haven’t clarify that “cafe” is a place
> > serving coffee drinks
> > or
> > a place providing seat for the consumer to have
> > something like coffee or
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 17:03, 德泉 談 via Tagging
wrote:
> In previous discussion we haven’t clarify that “cafe” is a place serving
> coffee drinks or a place providing seat for the consumer to have something
> like coffee or donut.
>
In British English, that is exactly the meaning of cafe,
>
> Ma
In previous discussion we haven’t clarify that “cafe” is a place serving coffee
drinks or a place providing seat for the consumer to have something like coffee
or donut.
Maybe a coffee kiosk is better to map with a kiosk + cuisine=coffee_shop?
-Tan
於 星期六, 6月 27, 2020, 11:00 下午,Shawn K. Quinn 寫道
sent from a phone
> On 27. Jun 2020, at 16:59, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
>
> Even if it
> was just a kiosk I would still tag amenity=cafe for consistency.
if it were just a kiosk you should not tag it as amenity=cafe, exactly for this
reason: consistency.
Cheers Martin
___
On 6/27/20 09:55, Philip Barnes wrote:
> Starbucks in my experience has seating, I am unaware of any which are
> takeaway only.
There are a couple out here that have outdoor seating only. Even if it
was just a kiosk I would still tag amenity=cafe for consistency.
--
Shawn K. Quinn
http://www.ra
On Sat, 2020-06-27 at 09:48 -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> On 6/27/20 09:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > I would be ok with fast food for bubble tea, although typically you
> > say “food and drinks”, i.e. calling a place where you can get only
> > things to drink and nothing to eat might seem a
On 6/27/20 09:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I would be ok with fast food for bubble tea, although typically you
> say “food and drinks”, i.e. calling a place where you can get only
> things to drink and nothing to eat might seem a bit strange?
>
> The fast food term has also some connotations a
On Sat, 2020-06-27 at 16:33 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 27. Jun 2020, at 16:03, Philip Barnes
> > wrote:
> >
> > I would call that a takeaway in everyday language which we map as
> > fast food in OSM.
>
> I would be ok with fast food for bubble tea, althoug
sent from a phone
> On 27. Jun 2020, at 16:03, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
> I would call that a takeaway in everyday language which we map as fast food
> in OSM.
I would be ok with fast food for bubble tea, although typically you say “food
and drinks”, i.e. calling a place where you can get on
On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 19:53 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> FWIW, I also believe these are very different from shop=beverages, as
> they are selling drinks ready to consume, while shop=beverages is a
> kind of shop that sells beverages to take home (while nothing
> prevents you from buying a si
Jun 26, 2020, 20:09 by o...@tobias-knerr.de:
> * Deprecate wikimedia_commons=* (because it unhelpfully mixes links to
> categories, images, and other media types – I agree that's an issue)
> * Move category links to commons_category=*
> * Move image links to image=*
>
I strongly dislike idea of
Move category links to commons_category=*
+1
It might make sense to choose a more generic name like image_category or
image_folder, so that any set of images, from any host, related to an osm
object can be linked.
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 20:11, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> On 25.06.20 19:57, p
20 matches
Mail list logo