When I lived in a suburb of Minneapolis, we had this bridge that everyone
graffitied. Some of it was typical trash, but others were works of art,
including Prince on a motorcycle. About the same time out came Prince's
album, Graffiti Bridge.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graffiti_Bridge_(album) The
Trying to tag this outdoor stage:
https://hota.com.au/hota-precinct/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/-28.00213/153.41696
(Best image is off Maxar Premium if it doesn't come through?)
The photo is of the outdoor stage (the actual stage itself is behind the
closed doors), with a roof over
On 7/1/20 18:03, António Madeira wrote:
> What is the criteria to tag a graffiti?
> Since there's no wiki for this type of artwork, the only information
> that exists is "A notable graffiti work", here:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:artwork_type
>
> So, what is a notable graffiti? A si
Well, depends on what you consider a mural to be. The distinction
between a mural and a graffiti should also be better defined.
A mural can be any painting or artwork apllied on a wall, indoors or
outdoors.
I would say that an outdoor mural is always a graffiti if it is painted.
Às 21:21 de 01
Yes, these are the two main issues regarding this tag: subjectiveness
and permanence.
Maybe a wiki could help and clarify what is a "notable" one.
This question arose in the Portuguese Telegram channel, where someone
was tagging pokemon paintings he himself did around his city. Some of
them are s
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 01:02, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> it’s a qualifier that is highly subjective as noted by Paul. The criterion
> is *you*. If you believe it should be mapped, then do it.
>
> Add an image= tag if you like, and if you are going to add further detail
>
And it's also, like m
sent from a phone
> On 2. Jul 2020, at 01:18, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> How would you tag your example? It doesn't really seem a good fit for
> any tag we have.
I don’t know the specific place, but typically I would tag
amenity=fast_food
cuisine=kebap
It also says “pizza” but from looking at t
sent from a phone
> On 2. Jul 2020, at 01:05, António Madeira wrote:
>
> What is the criteria to tag a graffiti?
> Since there's no wiki for this type of artwork, the only information
> that exists is "A notable graffiti work", here:
it’s a qualifier that is highly subjective as noted by Pau
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 1:18 AM Paul Allen wrote:
> I can't let Britain down in the bizarre food vendors contest. A butcher near
> me sells various types of raw meat (obviously). There are also racks
> outside on the pavement: a rack of fruit and a rack of vegetables. I was
> informed a few years
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 00:05, António Madeira wrote:
>
> So, what is a notable graffiti? A signed one? A big one? An authorized one?
>
Notable graffiti is graffiti that people take note of. It's as simple as
that.
It's subjective. Do you think it ought to be mapped, for whatever reason?
Then i
Funny that you mention. I've just read the Hungarian interpretation of
a legal advisor regarding what counts as seating. They were
differentiating between the sit down amenity kind and the
takeaway-only shop kind of cukrászda from a tax perspective.
According to them, in order for a _service_ to b
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 23:59, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> On 2. Jul 2020, at 00:44, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> I cannot deny the possibility, but I have never seen a takeaway
> kebab shop with seats for queuing customers.
>
>
> typical configuration in such places around here is a board (“table”)
>
What is the criteria to tag a graffiti?
Since there's no wiki for this type of artwork, the only information
that exists is "A notable graffiti work", here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:artwork_type
So, what is a notable graffiti? A signed one? A big one? An authorized one?
There are a
sent from a phone
>> On 2. Jul 2020, at 00:44, Paul Allen wrote:
> I cannot deny the possibility, but I have never seen a takeaway
> kebab shop with seats for queuing customers.
typical configuration in such places around here is a board (“table”) attached
to the wall and bar stools. You ca
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 23:21, bkil wrote:
> Again, I still don't have enough information about your "takeaway"
> places, but if you are not satisfied with takeaway=only + capacity=0,
>
I'm not that bothered about fixing it. I was putting it forward as an
example of the way we tag restaurants/caf
sent from a phone
> On 2. Jul 2020, at 00:21, bkil wrote:
>
> I can see someone started experimented with
> amenity=restaurant + restaurant=diner
>
> And:
> amenity=fast_food + fast_food=van/truck/street_kitchen
to keep this straight, these are long tail values, 77% of all fast_food values
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 23:11, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
takeaway oriented kebab place may still have one or two seats
> (either for waiting customers or maybe for a legal reasons)
> that are extremely rarely used
>
I cannot deny the possibility, but I have n
Again, I still don't have enough information about your "takeaway"
places, but if you are not satisfied with takeaway=only + capacity=0,
could it be also solved via subtagging?
I can see someone started experimented with
amenity=restaurant + restaurant=diner
And:
amenity=fast_food + fast_food=van
Jul 1, 2020, 23:30 by pla16...@gmail.com:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 22:10, Jarek Piórkowski <> ja...@piorkowski.ca> > wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah, but we're being told that British takeaways are very different
>> from other casual food places that have seating
>>
>
> A takeaway doesn't have seating.
>
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 22:10, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
>
> Yeah, but we're being told that British takeaways are very different
> from other casual food places that have seating
A takeaway doesn't have seating.
and the provision of seating is of key interest to Paul.
>
Yep. If you're on foot (
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 21:54, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> > On 1. Jul 2020, at 02:29, Paul Allen wrote:
> >
> > Few people would want to stand
> > in a queue while raw food is cooked for them.
>
> You have been writing a lot about cooking raw food,
When talking of cafes, yes. Especially the
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 16:55, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> On 1. Jul 2020, at 02:51, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
>> Do we want to introduce new tags for gastronomical service places? If
>> yes, so far takeaway has one of the clearer definitions I've seen, so
>> we could start there.
>
> we already hav
sent from a phone
> On 1. Jul 2020, at 13:34, Paul Allen wrote:
>
>> Eh, as opposed to retagging coffee shops or McDonald's being feasible?
>
> Indeed. That was my point. There's a lot that doesn't work well, but it's
> too late to fix it with retagging.
To give some numbers, wrt McD 99,
sent from a phone
> On 1. Jul 2020, at 02:51, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
>
> Do we want to introduce new tags for gastronomical service places? If
> yes, so far takeaway has one of the clearer definitions I've seen, so
> we could start there.
we already have the quite established tag takeaway=y
sent from a phone
> On 1. Jul 2020, at 02:29, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Few people would want to stand
> in a queue while raw food is cooked for them.
You have been writing a lot about cooking raw food, but regular restaurants
also use a lot of ingredients that have been precooked, typically by
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 20:00, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> > On 1. Jul 2020, at 12:55, Paul Allen wrote:
> >
> > Of
> > course, most people in the UK don't know that and just stick up a
> > house name or change an existing one without approval. Other
> > jurisdictions may not require approval.
sent from a phone
> On 1. Jul 2020, at 12:55, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Of
> course, most people in the UK don't know that and just stick up a
> house name or change an existing one without approval. Other
> jurisdictions may not require approval.
it does not mean we can not recognize the house
sent from a phone
> On 1. Jul 2020, at 04:35, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Highly likely these are errors. However it is not impossible that a number
> could be used as a house name.
can you give an example?
By which definition a number written as number can be a „name“?
If it
>> > Shop=pastry?
>> >
>>
>> Unfortunately we can't use that tag, as the menu of a cukrászda far
>> exceeds the definition of what the word "pastry" implies. They usually
>> offer many items from the following categories:
>> * cakes
>> * cookies
>> * custards
>> * doughnuts
>> * frozen desserts
>>
Jul 1, 2020, 13:49 by ajt1...@gmail.com:
>
> On 30/06/2020 14:06, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>
>> We have 15000 addresses such as addr:housename=3 (
>> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/VBS )
>>
>> Is there some chance that any of them is valid? Because it seems to me that
>> editors should
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 13:54, bkil wrote:
>
> > It would need guidance in the wiki as to where the line is between a
> > coffeehouse (or whatever we call it) and a cafe that isn't a coffeehouse.
>
> Yes, that should be a good idea before someone submits a grand
> unification proposal.
>
We need r
> The only possible downside I see is that it requires more carto code if you
> want different icons. But that would be necessary however we did this.
>
Possibly. But if part of the world already uses amenity=café for
places that do not primarily focus on coffee, this icon revision based
on subty
On 30/06/2020 14:06, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
We have 15000 addresses such as addr:housename=3 (
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/VBS )
Is there some chance that any of them is valid? Because it seems to me
that
editors should complain about addr:housename with just numbers.
Any? Qu
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 01:51, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 20:28, Paul Allen wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 01:02, Jarek Piórkowski
> wrote:
> >> Maybe tag them amenity=takeaway
> >
> > Good idea. Except that value is not officially agreed and isn't
> > rendered. Are you
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 03:10, bkil wrote:
> So just a quick idea, what do you think if we subtyped amenity=café?
>
On first thought, sounds good. I reserve the right to change my mind later
(it's possible some problem will occur to me), but right now I like it. It
means
you can map something th
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 03:35, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Highly likely these are errors. However it is not impossible that a number
>
> could be used as a house name.
>
>
Not impossible. But very unlikely. In the UK, you're meant to get your
house name approved by the local authori
Hi *
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 03:16:38PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> sent from a phone
> > On 30. Jun 2020, at 15:08, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> > wrote:
> >
> > Is there some chance that any of them is valid?
>
>
> IMHO not, these are likely autocompletion bloopers. I’d support
37 matches
Mail list logo