Re: [Tagging] Deprecate water=pond?

2020-11-13 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
Re: "I can hardly think of any waterbody, intermediate on the large..small and natural..artificial scales between the Great Lakes and a farmer's stock pond, where the `water=*` value would be uncontroversial." water=canal is the consensus tag for the area of a canal. There was never a standard

Re: [Tagging] Deprecate water=pond?

2020-11-13 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 6:22 PM Adam Franco wrote: > >- origination:natural=beavers > > Thanks for remembering this one. Around here, beavers are a significant sculpting force on the landscape. (And `man_made=dam` is the best tagging that we have for their water control structures, which

[Tagging] Questions about public transport tagging

2020-11-13 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Tagging
Hello, I have quite a few questions about Public Transport related tagging in Openstreetmap. My first question is about the "interval:conditional" & "opening_hours" tag for bus routes. The "Bus Route" page on the OSM wiki mentions this tag, but the train route or "public transport" route page

Re: [Tagging] Deprecate water=pond?

2020-11-13 Thread Peter Elderson
Ah, profiling! Hadn't thought of that yet. Best, Peter Elderson Op vr 13 nov. 2020 om 10:18 schreef Michael Patrick : > > I am surprised nobody has suggested a pondness or lakicity scale yet. >> > > It isn't unusual outside of OSM for relative percentages of the different > meanings to be

Re: [Tagging] Deprecate water=pond?

2020-11-13 Thread Michael Patrick
> I am surprised nobody has suggested a pondness or lakicity scale yet. > It isn't unusual outside of OSM for relative percentages of the different meanings to be accounted for. For example for Great Pond ( https://www.topoquest.com/map.php?lat=44.5=-69.8=nad83=16 ) with a surface area of