Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Crossing cleanup and deprecation

2022-11-29 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
29 lis 2022, 22:55 od dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > sent from a phone > >> On 29 Nov 2022, at 09:02, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging >> wrote: >> >> "no traffic signals" applies also only in some jurisdictions >> > > > If there are traffic signals the crossing in OpenStreetMap gets tagged >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Crossing cleanup and deprecation

2022-11-29 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 29 Nov 2022, at 11:06, Minh Nguyen wrote: > > What was the problem with crossing_ref=zebra again? it’s applied to signal controlled crossings as well when they have zebra road markings. > > What you seem to be suggesting is that the definition of crossing=zebra >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Crossing cleanup and deprecation

2022-11-29 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 29 Nov 2022, at 09:02, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging > wrote: > > "no traffic signals" applies also only in some jurisdictions If there are traffic signals the crossing in OpenStreetMap gets tagged crossing=traffic_signals, this is regardless of jurisdiction AFAIK.

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Approved - Tag:amenity=mailroom

2022-11-29 Thread Forman, George via Tagging
Tag:amenity=mailroom was approved to mark a mailroom for receiving packages or letters at a university, an apartment building complex, or a commercial office building complex. The tag is added either to a building outline or to a node denoting the specific location of the mailroom.

Re: [Tagging] ****SPAM:6.1**** Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - Crossing cleanup and deprecation

2022-11-29 Thread Robert Skedgell
On 29/11/2022 10:01, Minh Nguyen wrote: Vào lúc 23:01 2022-11-28, Martin Koppenhoefer đã viết: On 29 Nov 2022, at 00:52, Minh Nguyen wrote: Even if it weren't for iD's long-gone preset, I don't think an ostensibly global tag should be defined based on the narrow provisions of a specific

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Crossing cleanup and deprecation

2022-11-29 Thread Peter Elderson
In Nederland, zebra or zebra-path means just the striped pattern. No signs or signals are implied. It's the only named type of crossing*, everybody knows it. crossing=zebra is perfect for that; WYSIWIM (What You See Is What You Map). Very straightforward. Signals and signs may be present, but

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Crossing cleanup and deprecation

2022-11-29 Thread Minh Nguyen
Vào lúc 23:01 2022-11-28, Martin Koppenhoefer đã viết: On 29 Nov 2022, at 00:52, Minh Nguyen wrote: Even if it weren't for iD's long-gone preset, I don't think an ostensibly global tag should be defined based on the narrow provisions of a specific country's laws. I don’t think this is

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Crossing cleanup and deprecation

2022-11-29 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
29 lis 2022, 00:18 od dieterdre...@gmail.com: > Crossing=zebra is about a zebra crossing, it implies also vertical signs- in > some jurisdictions and some conditions at least - and it implies that there > aren’t traffic signals. > "no traffic signals" applies also only in some jurisdictions