Re: [Tagging] Change emergency=lifeboat-station to water-rescue

Sorry, meant to include the link to the previous discussions: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-December/066606.html Thanks Graeme On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 16:16, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > Hi all & welcome back to the New Year! > > With Christmas over, & the start of a

[Tagging] Change emergency=lifeboat-station to water-rescue

Hi all & welcome back to the New Year! With Christmas over, & the start of a new month, thought it must be time to revisit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/emergency%3Dlifeboat_station Just prior to Christmas, I had suggested, following various suggestions, that this

Re: [Tagging] Private ambulance / patient transport service

On 03/01/2023 22:42, Illia Marchenko wrote: Graeme Fitzpatrick : A suggestion on the forum of amenity=training for the first-air training side of things + a description of everything else. Note that the proposal for  amenity =training was rejected.

Re: [Tagging] Private ambulance / patient transport service

Graeme Fitzpatrick : > A suggestion on the forum of amenity=training for the first-air training > side of things + a description of everything else. > Note that the proposal for amenity =training was rejected. wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/training Regards, Illia. >

Re: [Tagging] Private ambulance / patient transport service

On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 22:33, Philip Barnes wrote: > That would be very misleading, these are not the normal public ambulance > service crewed by paramedics who you contact in an emergency. > > There is one locally who provide patient transport between hospitals for > the NHS. I would go with a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - yarn shops

On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 00:21, Nate Wessel wrote: > Would anyone object to an attempt to better cross-reference and > distinguish these categories? > That's always a good idea! :-) Thanks Graeme ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - yarn shops

On 2023-01-03 12:51, Philip Barnes wrote: Shops selling wool are commonly referred to as wool shops so why not shop=wool? Yarn doesn't seem very intuitive to me as a native English speaker. Nowadays, a lot of yarn is acrylic, or polyester, or cotton, or some other materials, or a mixture.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - yarn shops

On Tue, 2023-01-03 at 09:16 -0500, Nate Wessel wrote: > shop=wool ... this seems like almost exactly what I'm proposing. And > is used much more frequently than shop=yarn. > And yet for me, I never even thought to search for this. And the word > 'yarn' doesn't actually appear anywhere on the page

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - yarn shops

Jan 3, 2023, 15:16 by n...@natewessel.com: > > shop=wool > ... this > seems like almost exactly what I'm proposing. And is used much > more > frequently > than shop=yarn. > > > And yet for me,

Re: [Tagging] Tagging a hole in the ground

The wiki page for natural=sinkhole [1] suggests that it can be used with anthropogenic=yes as supplementary tag. That's assuming that this was covered and collapsed, but even without that history this might be "close enough" to use as a tag. I'd probably double tag as a sinkhole and hazard.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - yarn shops

shop=wool ... this seems like almost exactly what I'm proposing. And is used much more frequently than shop=yarn. And yet for me, I never even thought to search for this. And the word 'yarn' doesn't

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - yarn shops

On Mon, 2 Jan 2023, 16:20 Nate Wessel, wrote: > I was at a store like that > just recently. > > In that case I would probably tend to separate with a semicolon > `shop=yarn;sewing` or just pick the dominant type. There can be a bit of a > blurry

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - yarn shops

Shops selling wool are commonly referred to as wool shops so why not shop=wool? Yarn doesn't seem very intuitive to me as a native English speaker. Phil (trigpoint) On 2 January 2023 17:14:28 GMT, Nate Wessel wrote: >Howdy y'all, > >I am proposing to make official a tag that is already in use

Re: [Tagging] Private ambulance / patient transport service

That would be very misleading, these are not the normal public ambulance service crewed by paramedics who you contact in an emergency. There is one locally who provide patient transport between hospitals for the NHS. I would go with a commercial landuse and company=patient_transport and a

Re: [Tagging] Private ambulance / patient transport service

Maybe it would be more like an amenity=ambulance_station?--Sent from my Android phone with WEB.DE Mail. Please excuse my brevity.On 03/01/2023, 07:10 Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: Tried asking about this on the Community but no response so I'll bring it out here.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - yarn shops

On 3/1/23 10:26, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Am Mo., 2. Jan. 2023 um 18:17 Uhr schrieb Nate Wessel : Howdy y'all, I am proposing to make official a tag that is already in use to some degree, *shop=yarn*, for shops that primarily sell yarn and other knitting/crochet