On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 18:55, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> Proposal: service=access_collector
>
Sorry, means nothing, at least to me?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 13:12, Tod Fitch wrote:
>
> Assuming that NPR is not geo-restricted to the US:
>
>
> https://www.npr.org/2020/07/09/889562040/supreme-court-rules-that-about-half-of-oklahoma-is-indian-land
>
Thanks, Tod!
Going to be interesting to see where this goes in the future.
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 12:22, Clifford Snow wrote:
>
> The agreed upon tag for reservations is boundary=aboriginal_lands. It's
> used extensively in the US, Including the Mohawk Nation and across the
> Saint Lawrence River in Canada. We don't have consensus on how to tag off
> reservation land
On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 05:49, Tobias Zwick wrote:
>
> So what all these have in common is that they are not public roads not
> intended for through-traffic. They are all on private/public properties.
> So maybe they could be summarized under service=property, with a
> description like "roads on
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 07:45, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Building for the house, node for the workplace. Micromappers will be upset
> unless you place the workplace node precisely, of course, but you probably
> have never been inside so don't know. That's assuming it still is being
> used as a
On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 19:36, 德泉 談 via Tagging
wrote:
>
> The proposal would introduce a new tag (maybe amenity=drinks or
> amenity=takeout_drinks or what). This kind of places sell beverages mostly
> with takeaway paper or plastic cup, people can drink in their home or
> office after buying.
>
>
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 00:05, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
>
> I think this makes sense also. To a previous point, I take
> access=customers to mean someone intending to visit the associated
> location, whether that's a store, a church, a doctor's office, ...
>
> BTW, I've used access=customers for
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 00:53, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> I was thinking about space that explicitly welcomes walk-ins and exists
> solely to
> handle them (office of an energy company - handling issues such as
> resolving
> billing mistakes, handling
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 00:33, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
>
> - Semi-detached house: A set of row houses with exactly two connected
> units. (IMO this is a somewhat stupid distinction likely created by
> realtors for marketing purposes.)
>
& for us, that's a duplex eg
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 19:19, Michael Montani
wrote:
>
> Tag: natural = bare_ground (but many other options are open to discussion).
> Description: "An area covered by soil, without any vegetation"
>
I agree that we need some way to tag areas like those in Somalia that you
posted, but I have
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 23:33, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 23:04, Graeme Fitzpatrick
> wrote:
>
>>
>> but regardless of that, I'd like to know what an
>>
>>> Independent, ‘Australian-style’, or artisan cafes
>>>
>> Australian-sty
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 08:07, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 22:54, Graeme Fitzpatrick
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Something to do with kangaroos, is my guess.
>>>
>>
>> Check 1:53 & a few seconds after! :-)
>>
>
> You seem to have for
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 23:20, Paul Allen wrote:
> Except we don't have seating=yes. We can differentiate
> with takeaway=yes|no|only. However, apart from the chip shop and a
> Greggs, all
> the fast food joints near me that I can recollect are takeaway=only.
>
But then how do we handle food
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 23:08, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> We have 15000 addresses such as addr:housename=3 (
> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/VBS )
>
That search is producing an error for me, once over Australia & then again
for Western Europe:
" This query
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 12:26, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>
> The query only returns a count of how many elements it found. If you want
> to map them you'll need a modified version:
>
> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/VDp
>
Thanks!
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing
Trying to tag this outdoor stage:
https://hota.com.au/hota-precinct/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/-28.00213/153.41696
(Best image is off Maxar Premium if it doesn't come through?)
The photo is of the outdoor stage (the actual stage itself is behind the
closed doors), with a roof over
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 19:22, Jake Edmonds via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
I've got to say that personally, I don't think there's a need for a
separate "speciality" tag, but regardless of that, I'd like to know what an
> Independent, ‘Australian-style’, or artisan cafes
>
Thanks!
Graeme
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 08:13, Jake Edmonds via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Sorry Graeme, that should have said American style, where the waitress is
> refilling mugs from a carafe
>
___
Tagging mailing list
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 14:31, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>
> But should rowboat access restrictions be under this key
> canoe=yes/no/designated, or are they under boat=yes/no/designated - or
> something else?
>
As a boatie, I would say that rowboats should be a boat, while canoes &
kayaks (&
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 04:37, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> I would expect a "shop=mobile_phone" to sell mobile phones, so your first
> option of "shop=mobile_phone_accessories" is best, though
> "shop=phone_accessories" is also a good option.
>
Shop=phone_accessories could also mean accessories
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 08:59, Paul Allen wrote:
> Harder, as somebody else pointed out, is a McDonalds with seats. It's
> fast food, but it has seats. I'd map it as a cafe with takeaway=yes since
> we don't appear to have the option for fast food with seating=yes.
>
But McDonalds call
Don't know if it's only an Aussie thing (yet again! :-)), but we have (at
least) one franchise of shops called Boost Juice
https://www.boostjuice.com.au/, which only serve varieties of fruit juice &
smoothies.
Every one of them that I have seen are kiosks inside shopping centres, with
no seating
Certainly milk churns in Australia - at least to this Older English
Speaker! :-), even though TBMK they are no longer actually used.
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 11:31, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 02:10, Mike Thompson wrote:
>
>> I don't think anyone is saying that tracks can't have additional uses,
>> just that one of those uses has to be forestry, agriculture (and maybe
>> mineral extraction/energy).
>>
>
> They
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 05:47, Tod Fitch wrote:
>
> “Greenway” [1] was a term unknown to me too
>
I only found out when I looked at the link you provided that we have
"foreshoreways", & one most prominently mentioned is only about 2k from
where I live!
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 04:24, Cornelis wrote:
>
> • The bridge does not fall dry every autumn but* only in hot years with
> little rain*, thus in the concrete situation seasonal seems not the best
> tag from my point of view. Intermittent is more strictly bound to water, so
> that won't apply
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 06:30, Clifford Snow wrote:
>
>
> Sorry - I should have been clearer on #3. The red dot is a validation
> warning that the two ways intersect, but it isn't marked as a crossing.
>
(Not having a go at you, Clifford, just using your comment as an example!
:-))
"Recently"
Or Australia!
& is there any reason *not* to add things to the map features page?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Yep, there's a lot on it, & it takes a while to open.
But there's also no reason not to make use of it!
The people on this list are, I would say, well & truly towards the more
experienced end of the OSM spectrum, so you may not use it (although I
still do when I can't remember exactly what I
& for one that IMHO is quite correctly tagged as a pier over it's full
length:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18776776#map=17/-27.93856/153.43009
https://www.abc.net.au/news/image/10370420-3x2-700x467.jpg
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 01:27, Tod Fitch wrote:
>
> We are still left with the situation where an ephemeral waterway fans out
> over the desert and disappears. We need some sort of tagging to indicate
> this is not a mistake and I’ve not seen a tag or value come up in this
> discussion that has
thcare= seems a better option.
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Graeme Fitzpatrick
> wrote:
>
> I've just had a hip replacement done, so saw the orthopaedic surgeon this
> week for a follow up. While I was waiting, his receptionist took a call, &
> had to tell the caller th
Thanks everybody for your comments, but, to me, none of them really seem to
cover the situation, although stilts=yes seems to come closest, although it
also sounds rather strange!
Going back to my OP, I notice that I mentioned tagging the area as level=1,
thinking about it, maybe that should be
Not wanting to create a bunfight, but just reading the news, & wondering if
this sort of thing should be tagged as a hazardous area?
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-11-27/ethiopia-to-launch-final-phase-of-offensive-in-tigray-region/12926606
Thanks
Graeme
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 14:28, Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
> Assuming that the boundary of that area is reasonably permanent, my first
> reaction is that this could be described by military=danger_area. However,
> that tag requires landuse=military as the primary tag, which probably isn't
>
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 06:41, ael via Tagging
wrote:
>
> There are a surprising number of abandoned open mineshafts in the far
> West of England which are a hazard, if not an extreme hazard.
But if it's already (presumably) tagged with =mineshaft (+ =abandoned?),
does it also need to be tagged
Sorry, just read further through the e-mail list & saw that this has
already been covered
Thanks
Graeme
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 08:40, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> But if it's already (presumably) tagged with =mineshaft (+ =abandoned?),
> does it also need to be tagge
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 at 09:22, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Is there some value in surface=boardwalk tag?
>
> It seems to be a duplicate of surface=wood.
>
Fine distinction I know, but to me =wood would suggest a solid, unbroken
floor eg dance floor or
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 23:27, Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
> Comment is requested on the proposal "hazard", which describes hazardous
> or dangerous features. This tagging was first proposed in 2007, and I have
> adopted the proposal with permission from the original author. Thanks to
> the
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 04:14, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> I cannot remember having seen such signage for places where cyclists are
> using the road.
>
Doing it to you again! :-)
Thanks everybody for positive comments!
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 20:40, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> But maybe (or amenity=marine_recsue) would be better
> than a brand new key rescue in rescue=marine_rescue tag?
>
I've been wondering about that overnight?
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 15:01, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> Please be aware of a couple of other existing tags:
>
Thanks.
Yes I am aware of all those & made reference to the lifeguard tags in the
discussion about the Rescue Stations proposal: "The existing lifeguard
classifications could either
Following on from
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-November/056482.html,
I've put together a proposal to make some changes & additions under the
Emergency key.
Please visit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rescue_Stations & have a
look.
All comments welcome either here
Following on from
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-November/056482.html,
I've also put together a proposal to make some changes to the existing
Coast Guard pages.
Please visit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Marine_rescue & have a
look.
All comments welcome either here
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 23:19, Guillaume Chauvat wrote:
> I used a way tagged with highway=elevator as the wiki recommends, but this
> does not seem supported by any tool (the default editor, the map on
> openstreetmap.org, or osmand).
>
Highway=elevator renders on the main map eg
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 08:33, Guillaume Chauvat wrote:
> Yes, but this is a node, not a way. Inclined elevators require a way and
> those are not displayed properly.
>
Sorry, didn't get what you were getting at!
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
You can also get rather philosophical about it as well :-)
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-cW9iNszeKWU/WDuxft3rVBI/G70/HHEd7-W84k0tG_gakCs78RXXfoBfREfigCLcB/s1600/falling-rocks-dj-homewrecker.jpg
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 at 07:13, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>
> This will make it easier to fix problems with mappers who want to add
> hazard=curve to every single curve on a long curvy road, or add very
> subjective hazard features which cannot be confirmed or denied even when
> visiting the
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 04:22, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> you guys are finding real world examples for every weird situation that
> nobody expected to even exist. Traffic lights for rock fall somewhere?
>
No actual traffic lights, but how about a posted No Waiting zone? :-)
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 10:33, Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
> I fixed that for you, it should just be status=proposed, and the template
> does the rest of the magic!
>
Thanks, Brian!
Another one to lock away in memory :-)
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 10:19, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> I have just posted a new proposal re Military Bases:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Military_bases
>
But when I look at it, it's saying it's in Inactive status so not sure what
I've done there?
Following on from comments made in regard to deprecating both emergency= &
amenity=coast_guard & replacing them with military=coast_guard:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 02:01, Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
> This is probably a US-centric viewpoint, but I note that there is a
> general lack of tagging
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 17:13, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> This is an interesting idea.
>
> But the current proposal only provides a way to tag the military service
> branch of a military=base feature (which is usually also landuse=military).
>
> It might be better if there were a way to tag the
Brian came up with a suggestion that bases also be tagged with an
appropriate admin level (2 / 4) to show at which level of Government they
are controlled.
Just wondering - I know that the US has State controlled forces eg National
Guard, but are there any / many other countries that have forces
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 08:37, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> military bases might house intelligence facilities which are known and
> could be tagged.
>
They could, if you can identify them, but as mentioned above, should we be?
Thanks
Graeme
___
I've now incorporated all (I think?) the comments from the talk page into
the proposal, if you'd like to check the wording?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Military_bases
Thanks
Graeme
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 09:32, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 12:18, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> Please visit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rescue_Stations & have a
> look.
>
Thinking about this further, I'm thinking that Rescue Services may be
better than Rescue Stations?
I've also realised that Stations /
How do you tag an area, in this case an entire housing estate!, that is
raised up above ground level?
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-28.065772,153.3799853,3a,15y,117.51h,89.21t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sN_TJvFHJyLff1E4GmiCSjQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en
(with the usual not mapping from Google ...)
Just
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 11:20, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> Is the whole ground level a parking lot or parking structure, perhaps?
>
No.
It's built right beside a Creek, on a flood-plain (yeah, thanks Council!),
so it's done like that so that the apartments are up away from the water
the next time
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 23:37, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Kevin Kenny argued (I think convincingly) that the hazard is fallen, not
> falling, rocks. There is a very slight risk that a rock will fall on your
> vehicle but the greater risk, by far, is that you will drive into a fallen
> rock.
>
But not
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 22:24, Paul Allen wrote:
> Here is a videoabout a bridleway. Which is also a footpath (by legal
> definition). In fact,
> it's also a Byway Open to All Traffic (BOAT). Most of the time it's the
> ONLY way to visit Foulnes Island. It's also the most dangerous
> path in
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 09:11, Paul Allen wrote:
> Maybe drop bears, too.
>
Nah, no trees!
Although there are the telephone pole / ladder things (which I assume are
markers of some form), but no cover for them to hide in :-)
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 06:54, Yves via Tagging
wrote:
> Creating a new tag for this is not a bad idea.
>
Not a bad idea at all, even if just to stop them being marked as paths, but
what would you tag them as?
Footpaths etc are currently tagged as highway=xxx, which really isn't
appropriate for
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 23:29, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> I run into https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcoast_guard
> and despite that I have basically zero experience with such objects
> I am pretty sure that this description (and an old
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 02:33, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> Another argument against use of hazard=* for rapids is that the hazard key
> has been used almost always with highway=* features, not waterways.
>
Here are some examples of tags as "waterway feature" + type=hazard
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 10:19, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> I have just posted a new proposal re Military Bases:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Military_bases
>
This proposal is also getting close to voting.
Precis:
*deprecate*:
- milita
e the military=base tag added.
>
> How should military=base be defined?
>
> -- Joseph Eisenberg
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 2:44 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 10:19, Graeme Fitzpatrick
> wrote:
> >>
> >&
Does each bog & marsh have it's own name, or are just different surfaces
inside one big named wetland?
Thanks
Graeme
PS & please don't get frustrated & give up on trying to make progress!
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 at 02:11, Anders Torger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was on this list a while back
Graeme
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 at 08:44, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Does each bog & marsh have it's own name, or are just different surfaces
> inside one big named wetland?
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
> PS & please don't get frustrated & give up on trying to make progr
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 at 08:06, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> do we really need military_service=army given that these services will
> differ according to the country? We can tag operator =United States Army or
> “United States Marine Corps” and keep lists in the wiki for standardized
> names of
Once again, thanks everybody for your thoughts & comments! This is great,
please keep them coming!
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 17:28, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>
> I agree, and this can be easily fixed by changing the key to describe what
> we are actually specifying: "What military service branch is
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 at 19:30, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> Which military service are the Italian Carabinieri? The US Marines?
>
What about the Guardia di Finanza?
>
Yep, as mentioned previously, there will be a number of fine, fuzzy lines
(& yes, both words apply!) to sort out, mainly between
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 07:41, Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
>
>> Services often cross functions; for example, the US Army operates air
>>> fields[2]. Tagging this military_service=army would be accurate, but would
>>> not convey that this is an air force base, but not an Air Force base.
>>>
>>>
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 11:42, Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
>
> Yes, this makes sense in broad strokes, though some thought is needed as
> to the exact set of keys and values would be needed to describe these
> things.
>
Indeed! But we've still got another 10 - 12 days of RFC, so lo's of time
:-)
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 17:28, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>
> There are, in fact, military offices which are not within a
> landuse=military area, and there are military=danger_area features which
> are not in landuse=military
>
Offices not on base are possible, but will usually only be recruiting
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 12:14, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> Break - I've just found that there actually are a handful of
> club=army_cadets (8), =air_cadets (5) & =sea_cadets (2) already in use,
> although all are undocumented, so they will be fine.
>
Seeing that these
On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 at 09:00, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 1:25 PM Paul Allen wrote:
>
> I've had one German solemnly assure me that anything labeled a 'creek' in
> English is a minor watercourse, and challenge why I was mapping a riverbank
> for Schoharie Creek.
>
Thanks,
On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 at 15:14, Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
> "I'd like to swim in a small pool with a waterfall".
>
Good spot for one of your hazard tags!
We have Natural Bridge nearby
Thanks for those edits, Joseph.
They make things a little neater!
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 20:10, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> there are quite different kinds of bases, some are “permanent” and may be
> in the home country of the military, others may be in “allied“ nations,
> with contractual or defacto relationships, and there may be also those in
> conflict
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 at 10:37, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> imagine you were mapping something, and it is legal in the place where you
> are, but illegal in Britain, so you can not do it. Or you are seeing things
> in country A and when you’re in country B you add them to OpenStreetMap
> (from
Thanks
Graeme
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 at 16:44, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> OSMF board is not spending hours on monitoring wiki pages.
>
> I am spending hours on monitoring wiki pages and noticed it only recently,
> and only in a new proposal.
>
> Anyone
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 08:48, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> The leisure key is generally silly, because we assign these tags also to
> sports facilities for professional sports people, but for shooting ranges
> it seems even less appropriate to add them under leisure when the operator
> is the
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 08:59, Jeremy Harris wrote:
>
> I think rifle-shooting was a component of a triathlon in a recent
> Winter Olympic, too.
>
Winter Olympics has the Biathlon - cross-country skiing & very accurate
shooting, while the Summer Olympics has several different shooting events
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 02:00, St Niklaas wrote:
>
> Your text or proposal seems to be focused on modern times.
>
Yes, that's right, as it's intended for current, active, military
establishments only.
Since every town (vesting) or fortress (fort) has its own barracks in the
> past
>
Yes, but
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 03:59, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> when the term is military „base“ I would guess it will always be intended
> for more than a few weeks?
Yes, that's right.
Even if the label is „temporary“ it probably means years and not days?
>
Usually several months, at the very
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 09:32, Paul Allen wrote:
> It calls them speed bumps.
>
Yep, it seems like these are just a variety of speed bump
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming & =bump.
The existing definition is more or less OK in that it includes
Thanks
Graeme
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 09:44, Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
> for a price:
>
You're not wrong!
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 09:26, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> I have seen some shooting=range but the tag does not make too much sense
> for tagging a shooting range facility.
>
Yes, it does actually, because shooters go to a range to shoot.
We have sport=shooting and the physical nature of the
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 12:18, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rescue_Stations
>
Moved to voting.
If you still have any comments or concerns, please raise them for
discussion, rather than just voting "No, because ..."!
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 12:21, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Marine_rescue
>
Voting is now open.
If you still have any comments or concern, please raise them for
discussion, rather than just voting "No, because ...&quo
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 13:50, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> The text of the proposal is still confusing.
>
Sorry about that - maybe it should have been broken into 2 separate things?
Is the tag emergency=rescue_stations being proposed?
>
Currently the Emergency page has the heading "Other
Following discussions, voting has been postponed until the military=bases
proposal is decided, so this has been returned to Under Way only.
Thanks
Graeme
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 13:26, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 12:21, Graeme Fitzpatrick
> wrote
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 11:24, Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the comments! For the specific linked case (winding road for
> 74(!) miles), it seems that is already covered in the proposal -
> hazard=curves and its sub-tags cover this, and if it truly is 74
> consecutive miles, that
I should have added ...
So really, they're not "natural" in any way (except for the water in them!,
& even that is frequently pumped in).
Thanks
Graeme
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 12:20, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> In an Australian context, the most common are known as T
In an Australian context, the most common are known as Turkey's Nest dams,
because they're mounded up above the ground eg
https://c8.alamy.com/comp/A6T7R0/turkey-nest-dam-on-outback-cattle-station-queensland-australia-A6T7R0.jpg
For a full explanation:
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 12:18, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Please visit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rescue_Stations & have a
> look.
>
Reminder that voting is close to opening on this proposal.
*Precis:*
Amend the heading emergency=other_stations to emergency=re
Thanks
Graeme
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 12:21, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> Please visit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Marine_rescue & have a
> look.
>
This proposal (which is partly linked to both the Rescue Services &
Military Bases proposals) is also close to movin
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 09:32, Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
>
> Would this be satisfactory to the group in resolving the question of
> reservoir tagging?
>
Good idea to bring it up, but not sure it will resolve anything once & for
all?
Thanks
Graeme
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 14:51, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
>
> Personally I'd usually try to add the operator and operator:wikidata tags
> in combination to give more context.
>
Thanks - I never think of wikidata tags as I don't usually use them.
Added
Graeme
801 - 900 of 1059 matches
Mail list logo
