[Tagging] aerialway=mixed_lift

Hello, I found the rare but (in winter sport areas) important mixed_lifts with chairs and gondolas are not rendered on the osm mainpage. An issue for the rendering style https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/347 suggested a discussion about this tag here on the tagging list.

[Tagging] seafood vs fishmonger (was Re: Synonymous values in the shop key)

Mateusz Konieczny wrote on 10.07.2014 11:50: >> Although since the rules are for josm validation so will be checked by >> a human, I guess that's low-risk right? > I thought about JOSM validator rule with fix button, so it would > not be safe to assume that it will be carefully checked (the same ty

Re: [Tagging] interpolated housenumbers on single objects

could tag the housenumbers as a list. ( But the list could be long (and ugly *duck*) and es not representing reality. You do not want to expand w159099798 to addr:housenumber=15,17,19,21,23,25,27 -- regards Holger Jeromin ___ Tagg

Re: [Tagging] separator for addr:housenumber=*

ddr:housenumber=265-267 is the only correct > implementation > of this. But osm db needs a hint that 266 is missing. That is obvious on the street (by looking at the right and left building) but not in the data. > This is not a listing, this is a label only. We are not (o

Re: [Tagging] separator for addr:housenumber=*

Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 24.08.2014 22:50: >> Il giorno 24/ago/2014, alle ore 14:03, Dan S ha >> scritto: >> On the other hand, if you see an object tagged >> addr:housenumber=265-269 >> addr:interpolation=odd >> then we can be quite confident that the mapper intended you to >> interpret t

Re: [Tagging] service= tag confusion

johnw wrote on 20.10.2014 05:21: > On Oct 20, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Jack Burke wrote: >> However, on the wiki page for the service tag >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service >> it only mentions its use for highways, railways and waterways. > There are several other uses of the service ke

Re: [Tagging] what does maxheight=none mean?

Tom Pfeifer wrote on 27.10.2014 10:20: > As said before I am not against keeping a record of a bridge being checked, > just the value =none is misleading. > > Another problem is that the tag is on the way under the bridge, and > not the bridge way itself. That leads to the situation that somebody

Re: [Tagging] what does maxheight=none mean?

moltonel 3x Combo wrote on 27.10.2014 11:04: > * It can lead to mapping errors ... a bridge is > added somewhere else, etc. The problem of outdated information is completely unrelated to this tag. -- regards Holger ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@o

[Tagging] mixed guesthouse/hotel with restaurants (was Re: [OSM-talk] Release openstreetmap-carto v2.23.0)

esthouse with restaurant) was rejected here as a wrong tagging: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/969 -- greetings Holger Jeromin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Rooftop parking -> new parking=rooftop value?

johnw wrote on 11.11.2014 06:38: > I’m not sure of other countries, but at least in the US, parking on > top of retail structures is exceedingly rare - usually there are > adjacent multi-story parking structures. It always seems that there > is some kind of code or cost savings preventing it, alwa

Re: [Tagging] Rooftop parking -> new parking=rooftop value?

Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 11.11.2014 11:01: > 2014-11-11 10:56 GMT+01:00 Holger Jeromin > I would suggest two overlapping ways: > building=yes > amenity=parking > parking=multi-story > building:levels=5 > building:min_levels=2 > layer=1 >

Re: [Tagging] Rooftop parking -> new parking=rooftop value?

Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 11.11.2014 13:36: > 2014-11-11 12:53 GMT+01:00 Tobias Knerr > On 11.11.2014 06:38, johnw wrote: > > I assume there is a need to create a new parking=rooftop or similar > tag, which can then be used to create more accurate renderers (perhaps by > also placing

Re: [Tagging] Rooftop parking -> new parking=rooftop value?

Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 11.11.2014 12:21: > 2014-11-11 11:09 GMT+01:00 Holger Jeromin > > Me similarily, but would propose to use a multipolygon relation > instead. > > That's why they are there, overlapping ways are hard to maintain and >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Pipeline Extensions

Rainer Fügenstein wrote on 14.11.2014 17:42: > f> 2. We already have support=* which is used with man_made=surveillance > f> and is much more in use than mount=*. Do we really need two almost > f> identical tags ? > I agree with you on that. any chance to list it on the > man_made=surveillance wik

Re: [Tagging] semantic issue with "genus" in the wiki, wetland, plant nursery, ...

Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 01.12.2014 11:22: > I believe there are some semantic issues with how the wiki currently > suggests to tag details of plants, e.g. with the tags "genus" or "species". > > Now to plant nurseries, according to the wiki the suggested tagging is > (they do not have their o

Re: [Tagging] New openstreetmap-carto version: please check country and state boundaries

Pieren wrote on 11.12.2014 10:11: > Anyway, you speak about a "name" and a "ref" for the relation. Since > when do we need a "ref" for an admin boundary ? This is used for the short labels at zoom 4. Just look at the US at that zoo

Re: [Tagging] New openstreetmap-carto version: please check country and state boundaries

Matthijs Melissen wrote on 10.12.2014 18:29: > Lesotho seems to be the only country with state nodes but without > state boundaries. It would be great if someone were able to import > state boundaries for this country. The States from Lesotho seems to be named as districts, which are already in th

Re: [Tagging] New openstreetmap-carto version: please check country and state boundaries

Matthijs Melissen Wrote in message: > Dear all, > > . > > In order for state and country labels to be displayed correctly, > mappers should make sure that: > > - Country and state polygons are not broken (i.e. they must be a full > uninterrupted loop); Does the order in the relation matter?

Re: [Tagging] Problem with airport classification

Mateusz Konieczny Wrote in message: > So, would it be OK to assume that large airports are important and small ones > (including mapped as nodes) > are unimportant? Area size, take off count and passenger count does not give the only small heliport in a 2h drive priority. But I think a calc

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Donation

Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> Wrote in message: > Ok .. I'm wrong there.. you can donate just blood plasma. > > Not normal practice here for donations. A normal blood donation is > whole blood. > > But maybe in other places they do plasma only? > Plasma only is common in G

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Donation

Ruben Maes Wrote in message: > Replied inline below. > > 2015-06-10 6:52 GMT+02:00 Holger Jeromin : >> Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> Wrote >> in message: >> We have blood donation fully integrated in Healthcare 2.0 as far >> as I remember. >> I do

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Blood donation 2

Ruben Maes Wrote in message: > After the proposal Donation was rejected, I tried to address the > issues that were raised in a new proposal using > healthcare=blood_donation: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Blood_donation_2 > > You are of course welcome to point out an

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Blood donation 2

Ruben Maes Wrote in message: > 2015-06-22 23:20 GMT+02:00 Holger Jeromin : >> Ruben Maes >> Wrote in message: >>> After the proposal Donation was rejected, I tried to address the >>> issues that were raised in a new proposal using >>>

[Tagging] healthcare: attribute or stand alone tag? (was Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - Blood donation 2)

André Pirard wrote on 29.06.2015 17:08: > On 2015-06-22 23:20, Holger Jeromin wrote : No i did not wrote one single line in this quote... Please reply on the right message the next time. > Ruben Maes Wrote in message: >> After the proposal Donation was rejected, I tried to address t

Re: [Tagging] healthcare: attribute or stand alone tag? (was Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - Blood donation 2)

Holger Jeromin wrote on 29.06.2015 18:55: > André Pirard wrote on 29.06.2015 17:08: >> Ruben Maes Wrote in message: >>> After the proposal Donation was rejected, I tried to address the >>> issues that were raised in a new proposal using >>>

Re: [Tagging] Local highways classifications

Daniel Ko? Wrote in message: > There's a lengthy discussion going on polish forum about using > motorway/trunk tagging for our main highways: > > http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31488 > > It looks that whatever solution we will choose, there's no clear mapping > between OSM an

Re: [Tagging] Unmarked opening hours

Michael Reichert Wrote in message: > Hi Micha?, > > Am 2015-10-10 um 21:28 schrieb Micha? Brzozowski: >> In the course of surveys, I fill in opening_hours of shops and other >> venues. Sometimes though, they are not marked outside. Therefore, when >> looking at a feature that lacks opening_hours

Re: [Tagging] amenity=bicycle_repair_station

Erik Johansson Wrote in message: > amenity=diy_tool_station > bicycle=yes > iceskates=yes > locked=yes > opening_hours=during games. Nice idea! Ski lifts have often screwdrivers (for adjusting skis and snowboards), too. -- Holger Android NewsGroup Reader http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pools

Matthijs Melissen Wrote in message: > Hi all, > > There are currently two tags for swimming pools in use: > * leisure=swimming_pool (511?413 occurences) > * amenity=swimming_pool (46?495 occurences) Important topic. Imo for an outdoor water area the leisure=swimming pool is OK. What about a

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pools

Matthijs Melissen Wrote in message: > > > On 18 Dec 2015 19:46, "Holger Jeromin" wrote: > >> What about a tag for all swimming facilities (building or area) > >> and a separate tag for main usage > >> =fun > >> =wellness &g

Re: [Tagging] Art galleries/museums

Frederik Ramm Wrote in message: > Hi, > >the German word "Galerie" is often used for art showrooms where you > can actually buy the stuff on display. (I know a couple that are not > larger than a typical hairdresser's.) Hence I wouldn't be surprised if > many of the 415 tourism=gallery featu

Re: [Tagging] Bridge relations. Is that a 'thing'?

Dave F Wrote in message: > Hi > > Recent addition in my neck of the woods: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5979157 > > A relations collecting together the bridge outline & all the lanes. It's > the first I've come across. Are they widespread. > > IMO I can't quite see the point of

Re: [Tagging] AirBnB

Dave Swarthout Wrote in message: > I'm looking for a consistent way to tag AirBnB locations. It's probably > sufficient to tag them as tourism=guest_house but personally as one who > frequently uses AirBnB, I would like to be able to locate them more precisely > than is possible using the maps

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Education 2.0

=?UTF-8?B?0KjQuNGI0LrQuNC9INCQ0LvQtdC60YHQsNC90L TRgCAoU2hpc2hraW4gQWxlksandr=29?= Wrote in message: > Proposal for the new more flexible and extendable education tagging system: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Education_2.0 > Please, leave the comments on the discussion pag

Re: [Tagging] leisure=horse_riding or leisure=sports_centre

Martin Koppenhoefer Wrote in message: > > > sent from a phone > Il giorno 15 set 2016, alle ore 12:29, gscscnd ha scritto: > > What do you think about it? Should there be a separate horse_riding >> tag (and if so, should it be rendered on main map?) or shall we use sports >> centre Thanks fo

Re: [Tagging] non-temporary usage of highway=road

Aun Johnsen Wrote in message: > I see a lot of usage of the generic tag highway=road, which is meant as a > temporary tag and a ?low level entry tag? for beginners. The problem with > this is that because of its ambiguous meaning, it is impossible for data > consumers to process this correctly

Re: [Tagging] service:car for car shops and repair

wille Wrote in message: > Hi, > > Some days ago I made a pull request to iD editor with some fields to make it > easy for the user to set the service:bicycle tags in Bicycle shops. Bryan > Housel, iD main developer, proposed to use the same pattern to car repair and > shop tags. > > Currentl

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC - Magnetic Levitation Trains

Erkin Alp Güney Wrote in message: > > Another is magnetic levitation trains, this one having completed its >> draft quickly. This brings railway=maglev tag and its associated >> rendering. >> > Resent as per listmas