[Tagging] aerialway=mixed_lift

Hello, I found the rare but (in winter sport areas) important mixed_lifts with chairs and gondolas are not rendered on the osm mainpage. An issue for the rendering style https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/347 suggested a discussion about this tag here on the tagging

[Tagging] seafood vs fishmonger (was Re: Synonymous values in the shop key)

Mateusz Konieczny wrote on 10.07.2014 11:50: Although since the rules are for josm validation so will be checked by a human, I guess that's low-risk right? I thought about JOSM validator rule with fix button, so it would not be safe to assume that it will be carefully checked (the same type

Re: [Tagging] interpolated housenumbers on single objects

be long (and ugly *duck*) and es not representing reality. You do not want to expand w159099798 to addr:housenumber=15,17,19,21,23,25,27 -- regards Holger Jeromin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo

Re: [Tagging] separator for addr:housenumber=*

implementation of this. But osm db needs a hint that 266 is missing. That is obvious on the street (by looking at the right and left building) but not in the data. This is not a listing, this is a label only. We are not (only) painting nice maps. -- regards Holger Jeromin

Re: [Tagging] separator for addr:housenumber=*

Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 24.08.2014 22:50: Il giorno 24/ago/2014, alle ore 14:03, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com ha scritto: On the other hand, if you see an object tagged addr:housenumber=265-269 addr:interpolation=odd then we can be quite confident that the mapper intended you to

Re: [Tagging] service= tag confusion

johnw wrote on 20.10.2014 05:21: On Oct 20, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Jack Burke burke...@gmail.com wrote: However, on the wiki page for the service tag http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service it only mentions its use for highways, railways and waterways. There are several other uses of the

Re: [Tagging] what does maxheight=none mean?

Tom Pfeifer wrote on 27.10.2014 10:20: As said before I am not against keeping a record of a bridge being checked, just the value =none is misleading. Another problem is that the tag is on the way under the bridge, and not the bridge way itself. That leads to the situation that somebody

Re: [Tagging] what does maxheight=none mean?

moltonel 3x Combo wrote on 27.10.2014 11:04: * It can lead to mapping errors ... a bridge is added somewhere else, etc. The problem of outdated information is completely unrelated to this tag. -- regards Holger ___ Tagging mailing list

[Tagging] mixed guesthouse/hotel with restaurants (was Re: [OSM-talk] Release openstreetmap-carto v2.23.0)

://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/969 -- greetings Holger Jeromin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Rooftop parking - new parking=rooftop value?

johnw wrote on 11.11.2014 06:38: I’m not sure of other countries, but at least in the US, parking on top of retail structures is exceedingly rare - usually there are adjacent multi-story parking structures. It always seems that there is some kind of code or cost savings preventing it, always

Re: [Tagging] Rooftop parking - new parking=rooftop value?

Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 11.11.2014 11:01: 2014-11-11 10:56 GMT+01:00 Holger Jeromin mailgm...@katur.de I would suggest two overlapping ways: building=yes amenity=parking parking=multi-story building:levels=5 building:min_levels=2 layer=1

Re: [Tagging] Rooftop parking - new parking=rooftop value?

Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 11.11.2014 13:36: 2014-11-11 12:53 GMT+01:00 Tobias Knerr On 11.11.2014 06:38, johnw wrote: I assume there is a need to create a new parking=rooftop or similar tag, which can then be used to create more accurate renderers (perhaps by also placing the

Re: [Tagging] Rooftop parking - new parking=rooftop value?

Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 11.11.2014 12:21: 2014-11-11 11:09 GMT+01:00 Holger Jeromin Me similarily, but would propose to use a multipolygon relation instead. That's why they are there, overlapping ways are hard to maintain and more difficult to spot. Instead

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Pipeline Extensions

Rainer Fügenstein wrote on 14.11.2014 17:42: f 2. We already have support=* which is used with man_made=surveillance f and is much more in use than mount=*. Do we really need two almost f identical tags ? I agree with you on that. any chance to list it on the man_made=surveillance wiki page?

Re: [Tagging] semantic issue with genus in the wiki, wetland, plant nursery, ...

Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 01.12.2014 11:22: I believe there are some semantic issues with how the wiki currently suggests to tag details of plants, e.g. with the tags genus or species. Now to plant nurseries, according to the wiki the suggested tagging is (they do not have their own tag

Re: [Tagging] New openstreetmap-carto version: please check country and state boundaries

Pieren wrote on 11.12.2014 10:11: Anyway, you speak about a name and a ref for the relation. Since when do we need a ref for an admin boundary ? This is used for the short labels at zoom 4. Just look at the US at that zoom level. -- regards Holger Jeromin

Re: [Tagging] New openstreetmap-carto version: please check country and state boundaries

Matthijs Melissen wrote on 10.12.2014 18:29: Lesotho seems to be the only country with state nodes but without state boundaries. It would be great if someone were able to import state boundaries for this country. The States from Lesotho seems to be named as districts, which are already in the

Re: [Tagging] Problem with airport classification

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuM w...@public.gmane.org Wrote in message: So, would it be OK to assume that large airports are important and small ones (including mapped as nodes) are unimportant? Area size, take off count and passenger count does not give the only small

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Donation

Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com Wrote in message: Ok .. I'm wrong there.. you can donate just blood plasma. Not normal practice here for donations. A normal blood donation is whole blood. But maybe in other places they do plasma only? Plasma only is common in Germany,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Blood donation 2

Ruben Maes ruben.mae...@gmail.com Wrote in message: After the proposal Donation was rejected, I tried to address the issues that were raised in a new proposal using healthcare=blood_donation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Blood_donation_2 You are of course welcome

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Blood donation 2

Ruben Maes ruben.mae...@gmail.com Wrote in message: 2015-06-22 23:20 GMT+02:00 Holger Jeromin gm...@katur.de: Ruben Maes ruben.mae...@gmail.com Wrote in message: After the proposal Donation was rejected, I tried to address the issues that were raised in a new proposal using healthcare

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Donation

Ruben Maes ruben.mae...@gmail.com Wrote in message: Replied inline below. 2015-06-10 6:52 GMT+02:00 Holger Jeromin gm...@katur.de: Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com Wrote in message: We have blood donation fully integrated in Healthcare 2.0 as far as I remember. I do not see the need

[Tagging] healthcare: attribute or stand alone tag? (was Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - Blood donation 2)

André Pirard wrote on 29.06.2015 17:08: On 2015-06-22 23:20, Holger Jeromin wrote : No i did not wrote one single line in this quote... Please reply on the right message the next time. Ruben Maes ruben.mae...@gmail.com Wrote in message: After the proposal Donation was rejected, I tried

Re: [Tagging] healthcare: attribute or stand alone tag? (was Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - Blood donation 2)

Holger Jeromin wrote on 29.06.2015 18:55: André Pirard wrote on 29.06.2015 17:08: Ruben Maes ruben.mae...@gmail.com Wrote in message: After the proposal Donation was rejected, I tried to address the issues that were raised in a new proposal using healthcare=blood_donation: https

Re: [Tagging] Local highways classifications

Daniel Ko? dan...@xn--ko-wla.pl Wrote in message: There's a lengthy discussion going on polish forum about using motorway/trunk tagging for our main highways: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31488 It looks that whatever solution we will choose, there's no clear mapping

Re: [Tagging] amenity=bicycle_repair_station

Erik Johansson Wrote in message: > amenity=diy_tool_station > bicycle=yes > iceskates=yes > locked=yes > opening_hours=during games. Nice idea! Ski lifts have often screwdrivers (for adjusting skis and snowboards), too. -- Holger Android NewsGroup Reader

Re: [Tagging] Unmarked opening hours

Michael Reichert Wrote in message: > Hi Micha?, > > Am 2015-10-10 um 21:28 schrieb Micha? Brzozowski: >> In the course of surveys, I fill in opening_hours of shops and other >> venues. Sometimes though, they are not marked outside. Therefore, when >> looking at a feature that

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pools

Matthijs Melissen Wrote in message: > Hi all, > > There are currently two tags for swimming pools in use: > * leisure=swimming_pool (511?413 occurences) > * amenity=swimming_pool (46?495 occurences) Important topic. Imo for an outdoor

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pools

Matthijs Melissen <info-+UGbi7YX9/mGpCn6Dmg+AoRW q/skr...@public.gmane.org> Wrote in message: > > > On 18 Dec 2015 19:46, "Holger Jeromin" <gm...@katur.de> wrote: > >> What about a tag for all swimming facilities (building or area) > >&

Re: [Tagging] Art galleries/museums

Frederik Ramm Wrote in message: > Hi, > >the German word "Galerie" is often used for art showrooms where you > can actually buy the stuff on display. (I know a couple that are not > larger than a typical hairdresser's.) Hence I wouldn't be surprised if > many of the 415

Re: [Tagging] Bridge relations. Is that a 'thing'?

Dave F Wrote in message: > Hi > > Recent addition in my neck of the woods: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5979157 > > A relations collecting together the bridge outline & all the lanes. It's > the first I've come across. Are they widespread. > > IMO I

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Education 2.0

=?UTF-8?B?0KjQuNGI0LrQuNC9INCQ0LvQtdC60YHQsNC90L TRgCAoU2hpc2hraW4gQWxlksandr=29?= Wrote in message: > Proposal for the new more flexible and extendable education tagging system: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Education_2.0 > Please, leave the comments on the discussion

Re: [Tagging] AirBnB

Dave Swarthout Wrote in message: > I'm looking for a consistent way to tag AirBnB locations. It's probably > sufficient to tag them as tourism=guest_house but personally as one who > frequently uses AirBnB, I would like to be able to locate them more precisely > than is possible using the maps

Re: [Tagging] leisure=horse_riding or leisure=sports_centre

Martin Koppenhoefer Wrote in message: > > > sent from a phone > Il giorno 15 set 2016, alle ore 12:29, gscscnd ha scritto: > > What do you think about it? Should there be a separate horse_riding >> tag (and if so, should it be rendered on main map?) or shall we use sports

Re: [Tagging] non-temporary usage of highway=road

Aun Johnsen Wrote in message: > I see a lot of usage of the generic tag highway=road, which is meant as a > temporary tag and a ?low level entry tag? for beginners. The problem with > this is that because of its ambiguous meaning, it is impossible for data > consumers

Re: [Tagging] service:car for car shops and repair

wille Wrote in message: > Hi, > > Some days ago I made a pull request to iD editor with some fields to make it > easy for the user to set the service:bicycle tags in Bicycle shops. Bryan > Housel, iD main developer, proposed to use the same pattern to car repair and >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC - Magnetic Levitation Trains

Erkin Alp Güney Wrote in message: > > Another is magnetic levitation trains, this one having completed its >> draft quickly. This brings railway=maglev tag and its associated >> rendering. >> > Resent as per