Alright, I have a small bridge locally that has a duel weight limits on it.
One for normal and one combo. This is the bridge in question:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/69968204
The sign goes as follows: (I can also provide a picture of it later if it's
needed)
BRIDGE
=
WEIGHT
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:16:46 +0100
From: dieterdre...@gmail.com
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Combo Weight Bridges
2011/1/12 Martin Simon grenzde...@gmail.com:
These signs are refering to military load class (militärische
Lastenklasse), not to maxweight.
I've created a proposal for Emergency Traffic Signals, which are typically
found in front of fire stations and highway tunnels at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Emergency_Traffic_Signals
-- James
On 13 January 2011 16:10, Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org wrote:
On 01/12/2011 11:33 PM, James Mast wrote:
I've created a proposal for Emergency Traffic Signals, which are
typically found in front of fire stations and highway tunnels at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features
Alright, I've tagged the roadway that I was asking this about with the
following:
lanes=3
lanes:counterflow=center
That should work for now.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/24873632
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
...@gmail.com
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Counterflow Lanes
On 2/18/2011 5:00 AM, James Mast wrote:
Alright, I've tagged the roadway that I was asking this about with the
following:
lanes=3
lanes:counterflow=center
I believe the word is contraflow
I've personally heard Contraflow mentioned for the switchover's some DOT's
have on Interstates for Hurricane (or other) evacuations in the press. I know
I-95 in Georgia happens to have two such crossovers, but they don't
specifically say contraflow on the signs. Here are links to how they do
on a
highway that isn't divided
On 4/13/2011 1:45 AM, James Mast wrote:
So does anybody have any suggestions on how to deal with something like
this? Here's my example:
Here in Pittsburgh, when you're coming off I-579 going towards the South
Hills across the Liberty Bridge, you
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
CC: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
On 13 April 2011 17:06, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Not the same situation here NE2. There are no traffic lights at
all installed in either place for the inbound direction, just outbound.
Is the 2 directions
...@ursamundi.org
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:11:25 -0500
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Traffic Lights, but only for one direction on a highway
that isn't divided
On 04/13/2011 12:45 AM, James Mast wrote:
So does anybody have any suggestions on how to deal with something like
this? Here's my example:
I'm pretty
I was just about to create some new relations for the I-279/I-579 HOV lanes to
reflect the times that they are open and closed.
http://www.dot.state.pa.us/penndot/districts/district11.nsf/traffic_HOV_hours?OpenForm
That shows the current times when they are open and when Outbound is
I was just thinking, here in the USA, we sometimes have exit ramps that after
they split from the main highway, split again (sometimes with separate exit
#'s). One such example would be Exit #1B-1C (old #7A-7B) on I-279 here in
Pittsburgh, PA.
(Google StreetView examples from when the exits
Alright, if anybody had been following this, but just didn't want to comment,
now's your chance.
I have added the relations for the restrictions.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8189558
I-279 - 9 relations (4 mainline; 5 ramps)
I-579 - 4 relations (all mainline since no
Well, I'm working up an official proposal for this right now. Will updating
this thread and also send out a RFC once it's done. ;)
-- James
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
I've created a proposal for an extension of the sub-tags (ref=* and exit_to=*)
of highway=motorway_junction.
This is to help people on tagging highway ramps that split farther down after
they leave the main highway. It will also help deal with other motorways
splitting off of the main
09:28:40 +0200
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=motorway_junction
Tagging Extension
On Sun, 22 May 2011 02:38:48 -0400, James Mast wrote:
I've created a proposal for an extension of the sub-tags (ref=* and
exit_to=*) of highway=motorway_junction.
This is to help people
I'm just wondering, is there a general consensus on how to tag maxheight in
Feed Inches? I've looked at the taginfo and noticed several different ways
people have been doing it.
14'1 / 14'-1 / 14' 1 / 14ft1in
I just wanted some opinions before I tagged some of US-19 in WV that has some
low
All I know is that service=drive-through was rendered already in Mapnik while
service=drive_through is not. Look here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.525952lon=-80.006203zoom=18layers=M I
had originally tagged the Drive Thru's for Taco Bell and Arby's here as
service=drive-through
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 13:11:17 +0200
From: dieterdre...@gmail.com
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?
There is many more of them. I propose to use
service=drive-through
I agree with this. Maybe we should do one final vote on
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:10:43 +0900
From: a.erring...@lancaster.ac.uk
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] rest_area and service road
On Thu, September 29, 2011 04:08, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 9/28/2011 3:04 PM, Pieren wrote:
What is our recommendation for tagging
I would love to see a bot run after the database officially was declared odbl
to delete them and the odbl:note tags. ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Gauß has now also added a new section called More turn restrictions with a
ton of new restrictions that none of the editors support. Heck, I don't think
any routers support them as well. All these new turn restrictions deal with
half turns.. Maybe Gauß needs a time out on editing that page,
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:26:11 -0400
From: nice...@att.net
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tag ref on motorway_link
On 10/23/2012 4:10 PM, Johan C wrote:
c) it quite often will be impossible for any (present/future) routing
engine to always predict the right exit
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:57:01 -0600
From: ba...@ursamundi.org
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Stop sign?
Are there examples of traffic signals that don't control all the ways they're
located? With stop signs, typical application only applies to one or two of
the
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:50:42 +0100
From: osm...@gmail.com
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] exit_to on motorway_junction
b. no solution of the exit_to_left yet to support both branches There is a
solution in the form of this proposal that I made awhile ago that nobody
Why wouldn't something like a node tagged highway:forward=give_way work?
-James ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:35:45 +0200
From: pier...@gmail.com
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Micro mapping traffic signals
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Vincent de Château-Thierry
v...@laposte.net wrote:
This only deals with single traffic light mapping and
But what if the pole has both telephone and power on it? ;) That's what's
common here in my neighborhood. I can look out my front door and see a pole
with both of them using it.
-James
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:05:38 +0200
From: francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu
To:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:centre_turn_lane
?
This is what I've been using.
-James
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 18:11:11 -0500
From: ba...@ursamundi.org
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Center Turn Lane Tagging?
lanes:both_ways=1turn:lanes:both_ways=left
On Sat,
of
primary, even when undivided).
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 8:15 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:centre_turn_lane
?
This is what I've been using.
-James
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 18:11:11 -0500
From: ba...@ursamundi.org
To: tagging
Here's how we have done this in the Pittsburgh, PA area where the 'light rail'
line shares the pavement with the normal road lanes. They normally only use
this line during the rush hours unless they have
to close the tunnel @ Station Square and divert the light rail traffic
along this route.
Well, in the US, I've just been tagging the 'ramp' speeds (
https://goo.gl/maps/Bw8Is ) as a normal 'maxspeed'. I know several other users
here in the US have been doing it the same way.
However, I wouldn't be opposed if we wanted to tag them as 'maxspeed:ramp=35
mph', but only if we could
I'm just curious, but what does everybody think about the 'covered=yes' tag
when used on highways? I know you aren't suppose to use it when the highway
goes under a bridge, but I've been noticing more people adding the tag in that
case, even though the Wiki page on that tag says you shouldn't.
I honestly think Mapbox needs to stop immediately editing ways that they think
are invalid. I've seen several ways that I've work hard on, know are valid,
and are being damaged by edits. The 'NONE' tag in turn lanes is COMPLETELY
VALID
Well, here's an example of how I dealt with US-19 Truck over here in Pittsburgh
were it isn't signed on I-279 or I-376 except inside of the I-376 exit 69 mess
on the south side of the Fort Pitt Tunnels.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/571349 (signed)
35 matches
Mail list logo
