Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 7, 2015, at 3:59 PM, geow ks...@web.de wrote:
multi-use-path
Highway=cycle-ped_path
Done!
Lets render it with purple dots (blue+red).
Or we could just render it as a sidewalk, as that is what it is. A Sidewalk.
Highway=footway+footway=sidewalk.
Which
So if it swells less than 50%, it is adsobent. I learned a new word today.
Javbw
On Aug 8, 2015, at 5:54 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
Note the subtle spelling difference between
absorption and adsorption:
http://www.integrityabsorbents.com/content/abvsad.php
On Aug 10, 2015, at 12:56 AM, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote:
Overall I only see that this in some way might be usefull for phone and
email. But I think it's better to assume phone= is used for some basic
contact number and then use other tags like phone:emergency= or
I agree that highway=* can't imply quality globally, but it is documented
country by country how to tag certain types of roads, especially when there are
enough types of roads to need all the definitions of highway=*. Japan's tagging
page defines all the values and relates them to their
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 6, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
If all mappers just map cycleways and don't care for access restrictions for
pedestrians we end up with the same tags meaning different things.
That is very true - which means that
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 27, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
access=military has been discussed in the past (for roads) and dismissed
The area all around mt fuji is a military training ground. The major roads up
the sides (which tourists drive) are
On Jul 27, 2015, at 3:04 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
For land areas owned/used by the military for whatever purpose
Shouldn't that be for military or related purposes?
The military ownsrecruiting centers in malls, that wouldn't be a good fit
either.
Martin brought
Im referring to the base platforms that make up the uninteresting part of a
large playground piece. The other things are usually attached to it. Maybe it
has a ladder or steps on one side, but it is the mundane part - the structure.
The slide, rope bridge, zip line, etc are all bolted on the
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 22, 2015, at 4:03 PM, Tom Pfeifer t.pfei...@computer.org wrote:
ships
or castles are common in Europe, its the theme, and it would be good to
separate that
from the functional category.
I guess that is a good way to look at it.
BTW, 'mountain' is a bit
On Jul 21, 2015, at 3:52 PM, Tom Pfeifer t.pfei...@computer.org wrote:
I would prefer to have that in the playground:theme=* tag,
thus playground=structure and
playground:theme=octopus_mountain|ship|castle|dungeon|etc
If they were a one-off, yea, but they are a named playground item here
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 15, 2015, at 3:05 AM, Andy Townsend ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
Some of the proposed highways* are clearly just flights of fancy with no
timescale or money behind them.
Yea, thats true - There are some freeways in California that have been proposed
for 50 years!
There is 1200 uses of man_made=pumping_station, so is this something worht
documenting as in use and adding to the man made wiki page?
Javbw?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 18, 2015, at 8:11 PM, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:
there are a lot of “works” that are related to control stormwater runoff
There is talk on the discussion page about tagging what it is pumping (drinking
water, sewage, raw water, etc) so i think we should add the tag for is the the
pipeline umm.. Medium? usage? Ill have to check what is the documented method
for tagging what a pipe is carrying, and make sure there
Question on storm drain tagging -
Most of the rivers here have storm levees to hold back the typhoon runoff (like
right now in Kyoto) - and *every* single tiny stream and many drains from rice
farming (drains are streams streams are drains when everything goes through a
field) go into a
Shouldn't be drainage? Perhaps flood_water would be a good choice
Javbw
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 19, 2015, at 7:48 AM, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com wrote:
Drain is missing
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Because it is under the playground tag, just structure should be fine.
Structure might be a good value for a large piece, if the other pieces
(bridges, slides, climbing nets, etc) are large enough to be mappable (like a
very large installation at a park).
If it is really small with a small
A lot of playground equipment has a theme, especially old ones. Concrete
octopuses that you climb and and one of his tentacles is a slide is common (in
old playgrounds) here in Japan. They are so common, they should have a value
(and maybe an icon Playground=tako_no_yama)
I think it would
drainage would be better than drain
On 19 July 2015 at 02:49, John Willis jo...@mac.com wrote:
Shouldn't be drainage? Perhaps flood_water would be a good choice
Javbw
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 19, 2015, at 7:48 AM, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com wrote:
Drain is missing
On Jul 21, 2015, at 3:56 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is almost not more information than without it
I think that is untrue.
If this were building=yes, then it really doesn't give a clue what the
structure is.
But in the playground key, every element is
On Jul 21, 2015, at 4:01 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think this is ok, if these are indeed japan specific, but I'd add a
namespace like this:
playground=jp:tako_no_yama
so if I was tagging it in english it would be playground=octopus_mountain
Or in
Javbw
> On Oct 25, 2015, at 9:33 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
>
> two tags describe a situation quite common in Alaska.
Quite common here too in Japan. The runoff is captured and fed into a
feed/drain system to fill rice fields with water, as well as used as a mostly
> On Oct 26, 2015, at 2:19 AM, david wrote:
>
> The factory
> takes harvested olives, after a few process, olive oil is produced).
The olive mill suggested was 5 years old, so adding that man_made tag would be
on top of a few other tags.
The big thing is if it is
> On Nov 10, 2015, at 12:59 PM, Andrew Guertin wrote:
>
> amenity=bicycle_tool_stand
+1
Self_serve_bicycle_tool_stand is also good too, if you want to really drive the
point home, though a bit long.
Javbw.
___
Tagging
Javbw
> On Nov 13, 2015, at 6:45 AM, John Eldredge wrote:
>
> Could you have a named signal at a named junction, with different names?
Afaik, named road junctions do not exist in Japan (motorway junctions are
named, but not normal roads with signals) I am not sure
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 6:21 PM, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
>
> This is not the only example when a residential road doesn't have a
> name
There are no residential street names in all of Japan for tertiary roads and
below (99.99%). There are a lot of numbered roads, but
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 1:15 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> For start, traffic sign itself may be also mapped. It would also make
> clear that hazard (or other method to tag this) is based on something
> verifiable, not opinion of the mapper.
Sounds like a similar
> On Nov 9, 2015, at 9:38 PM, tomoya muramoto wrote:
>
> *You want to establish a new tag such as traffic_signals_area to solve
> multiple signals rendering.
> *Opinions on the new tag are welcome from Japanese/Asian community because
> rendering of traffic signal
> On Nov 1, 2015, at 3:02 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
> I commonly tag the center-lane variety as lanes:both_ways=1,
> access:lanes:both_ways=no
I completely forgot about the center common bi-directional turn lane. Tons of
them in the US, never seen one in Japan yet.
> On Nov 1, 2015, at 8:56 PM, Richard wrote:
>
> a way
> which is shared by a waterway, a mulptipolygon forrest and an
> administrative boundary.
Clean up the inaccurate mapping and then do it the right way. I'm sure you can
find an airport boundary, a fence, and a power
> On Nov 1, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
>
> access. I tag the enclosed area with highway=pedestrian, area=yes, and the
> way surrounding it
Your road islands have people on them?
They have big signs here saying "no crossing - cross at the light" with a
> On Oct 30, 2015, at 12:03 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> IMHO, if you don't consider them significant enough to be mapped as a way you
> should maybe not map them at all.
+ 1
These are small *culverts* - not bridges or tunnels for a main road - so they
are
Here's a picture of some mountain flowers (the tiny pink ones) on
Kusatsu-shirane, near Kusatsu. They look natural, but they were all planted and
maintained as a tourist attraction. They were not native to the area.
https://m.flickr.com/#/photos/javbw/11094084766/
The picture I took is not so
(This Was sent earlier but looks like it wasn't received. Cleaned up/ clarified
a bit and sent again).
> On Nov 6, 2015, at 1:30 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> However, I do not see why the "ignorance" of the non-Asian mappers
Full disclosure: I am an American. I moved to
> On Nov 4, 2015, at 2:46 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> The network is ran/owned by a government institution, the actual power
> distribution by commercial providers. So when you want a contract to get
> electricity you go to a commercial entity. So building=civic is not
Javbw
> On Nov 6, 2015, at 1:09 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
>
> I'd suggest to use a node tagged
> place=junction
>
> with name=* or ref=*
> for this. What do you think?
>
From what I remember - in Korea they name junctions, and in Japan they actually
name the
Javbw
> On Nov 6, 2015, at 3:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> I suggest to be quite specific at this type level, because barrier=fence is
> already generic. For the material without any more detail we could use
> fence:material rather than a type tag
+1
In
I would use navigation aid=*
I tagged a ton of Approach Aids (PAPI, localizers, VOR, etc) for Narita Airport
(NRT) and the navigation aid subkey covers all of it and is very well
documented. If you understand a pilot's airport diagram guide, it's easy to
tag the correct information.
> On Nov 4, 2015, at 5:12 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> The building tag is about the building itself,
That is a good point. I don't want to throw all this in amenity.
It isn't a shop...
Office=*. ?
I always assume that a building at this level is usually
Javbw
> On Nov 4, 2015, at 7:01 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> everything's an object ;-) (if you want/need to)
In a general sense, everything is a node, way or area object, yea.
But a flower field is not a man_made=* object, in the common OSM usage.
It's
> On Nov 4, 2015, at 6:53 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> while front facing offices often get the shop tag.
Most offices that provide customer service for existing services or billing
resolution don't seem like a shop.
If the role for shop=* is so expansive,
> On Oct 19, 2015, at 12:39 AM, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
> Trade is more an access tag, you can have a shop=motor_spares for
> example. Some are open to the public,
Is that really implied in the trade tag?
I understand if you need a license or certification to buy parts
> On Oct 14, 2015, at 10:35 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>
>
> Oxford dictionary describes kiln as
> "a furnace or oven for burning, baking, or drying, esp. one for calcining
> lime or firing pottery."
We should really separate things used to prepare foods and things used
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 4:27 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> Another famous example: Hearst Castle [1]
> I think the "historic" key is correct.
>
+1
Hearst castle is definitely historic, its on several historic records.
My parent's house in California, built in 1922 out of
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 4:02 AM, François Lacombe
> wrote:
>
> importance=*
That word is not allowed over in -carto github, no matter how relevant or
useful - like with mountains or regional features that need to shown at varying
z levels based on... Importance.
Javbw
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 12:11 AM, David Marchal wrote:
>
> Do you mean that the landscape impact criteria is already the one used to
> distinguish minor_line and line?
I think he means that there is usually a huge difference in voltage and line
type between lines on
Javbw
On Oct 15, 2015, at 6:31 PM, Éric Gillet wrote:
>> > On Oct 15, 2015, at 4:02 AM, François Lacombe
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > importance=*
>>
>> That word is not allowed over in -carto github, no matter how relevant or
>> useful -
> On Oct 8, 2015, at 2:43 AM, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
>
> http://blog.al.com/breaking/2011/12/no_through_traffic_signs_in_ne.html.
> This case would be unthinkable here in Central Europe.
The police have no power because the road is public and built, so people are
legally
There are a couple shops like "la mesa Lumber" and places dedicated to
stone that are public shops. Often times they are the more "pro" shops a
builder or DIY person goes to source a large quantity of wood, tile, or stone
for a building project - but there is not a tool to be found (all that is
Li really like the idea of cleaning up the shop values, especially removing
really generic ones.
But specific ones have their place
For example, electronics is a good shop value, but what about a ham radio
store?
Generic hobby shops exist, what about model train shops?
We need to create a
Javbw
> On Oct 16, 2015, at 3:49 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> t least the intention was to build a castle, the typology is copying
> from castles, Hearst ruled an imperium (of publishing), he organized
> impressive receptions, held formal dinners, etc. --- for
Javbw
> On Oct 16, 2015, at 4:33 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> I d call the hearst residence at least a villa, if castle doesn't find
> agreement.
A villa or mansion or something more than a common house - but...
It just feels weird to tag a more modern
Javbw
> On Oct 16, 2015, at 3:31 PM, Georg Feddern wrote:
>
>
> Ever worked/trained with horses?
>
> What is the key definition for sport?
> Concentration? Reactions? Best moves? Power?
>
> Is a carrière
> - sport_practice when there is just training
> but
> - sport
Javbw
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 5:11 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
>
>> Am 18.10.2015 um 02:28 schrieb John Eldredge :
>>
>> I find shop=trade too generic to be useful, as there are many different
>> trades besides the building-construction
Javbw
> On Oct 17, 2015, at 9:59 AM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
>
> > If I don't know something .. I don't tag it.
> > So I would simply not add the tag.
>
> This is the right answer.
>
> +1
>
+1
> Agreed. Why would you add a tag when you don't know a value to assign?
Javbw
On Oct 8, 2015, at 4:40 AM, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
>> Similar to shop=craft.
>
> Do you know what hobby this is about? Almost everything can be a hobby.
I belive it is about some form of scale model building or small scale electric
things (trains rc cars, planes).
> On Oct 11, 2015, at 12:35 AM, Éric Gillet wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I know this is not a vote or anything close, but wanted to say I don't think
> a ban, especially a month-long ban, was warranted by Frederik's two last
> messages.
I disagree with Frederik's position
> On Oct 11, 2015, at 12:35 AM, Éric Gillet wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I know this is not a vote or anything close, but wanted to say I don't think
> a ban, especially a month-long ban, was warranted by Frederik's two last
> messages.
Oops - forgot to add:
+1
Javbw
> On Oct 11, 2015, at 3:25 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> Castle as in "a type of fortified structure built in Europe and the
> Middle East during the Middle Ages by nobility".
We'll have to append "and Asia" on that. There are castles all over Japan
(China too?), and
> On Oct 12, 2015, at 1:18 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> This historic places map has a list of castle types,
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Historical_Objects/Karteneigenschaften
> There is "Shiro" in the list, which is marked a Japanese Burg.
Its up now and I
> On Oct 6, 2015, at 8:48 PM, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
>
> So if "destination" excludes off-wanderers and sightseers, what tag do you
> use when you need to include them?
Yes/permissive under general.
If I am free to come up park my car for any reason and wander about, that
> On Oct 14, 2015, at 1:42 AM, NopMap wrote:
>
> Therefore I think
> that a very general tag historic=castle and a subtag for refinement is a
> better idea, even if the actual meaning is more like "castle-like building".
Does this include plastic disney castles?
Those are
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 11:16 PM, Bryan Housel wrote:
>
> A simper way to describe this would be to say that:
>
> `power=line` is for “transmission”
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_transmission
>
> `power=minor_line` is for “distribution”
>
Then why did they keep track+level1+paved at all? It's like calling it a
motorway level 9. Its shoehorned into somewhere it doesn't belong.
These roads may have a similar purpose - local access - but the grade of the
road is completely out of the category I would ever call a track.
There are
I want to make a new definition for the the service=subkey to better define
highway=service when used to map the the odd public, maintained, paved, yet
extremely narrow, meandering, and often parallel or inconvenient nature of a
lot of rural roads in Asia that are used to access sections of
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 9, 2015, at 8:03 AM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
very rough construction
Most of these are in very good condition, comparable to the residential or
unclassified roads. They are well made and well maintained, besides the summer
overgrowth that grows too
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 9, 2015, at 6:03 AM, John Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
I have seen some people insist that highway=track only be used if the landuse
Is farmland, but not if the land is covered by bushes or trees because no
cultivation is taking place.
That is weird as
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 9, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com wrote:
highway=track
Yes, it is where a grade 3(?) track meets the service roads.
^_^
Javbw
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Jul 12, 2015, at 10:34 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Maybe you have to raise your current unclassified roads to tertiary to make
room for these roads in question?
Japan tagging rules (on the wiki) states only roads with a painted center line
can be tagged
Footway is a constructed or engineered way, dedicated and built to a grade
where foot traffic should expect an easy walk. This might make other traffic
passage easier as well ( bikes), but engineered with pedestrians in mind.
Path is a cleared area with minimal-to-no construction to create the
The Montgomery ward's department store in my old hometown was turned into a
Walmart (2 stories) but most department stores in California are 1-2 floors
(with most targets and walmarts being 1 story). Most supermarkets are one.
Size is the only difference in their construction, and often near
and the other
began.
Javbw
On Aug 28, 2015, at 7:20 AM, John Willis jo...@mac.com wrote:
To many people, the brand logo out front and the color choice of the paint
will signal that it is a market or a dept store far beyond it's architecture,
in most cases
On Aug 29, 2015, at 7:17 AM, geow ks...@web.de wrote:
Along with specific sub-tags for physical and access properties it's the
Swiss army knife for non motorized traffic.
We have a cutting block full of kitchen knives. How many people use the
pocketknife to cut vegetables in the kitchen?
Javbw
On Aug 29, 2015, at 7:46 PM, Richard ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
I think that trail is very vague, look at english witkionary, wagon trail
etc
so the word itself would already cause trouble.
highway=footpath may cause less trouble
I think highway=primary is very vague. It is the
On Aug 29, 2015, at 9:50 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
supermarkets have different requirements than electronics stores, e.g.
because they have big refrigeration storage areas (with good insulation).
Yes, you could use them for other purposes, but it typically
Javbw
On Aug 29, 2015, at 9:50 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
I thought anchor stores are dedicated areas in malls and shopping centers,
not buildings on its own (i.e. the tag would be building:part in this case)
Technically, the anchor is the large important
On Aug 29, 2015, at 9:53 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not sure those are or have to be landuses , eg the gated community is a
settlement or settlement part.
A group of separate buildings that make up an apartment complex is a single
named
On Aug 29, 2015, at 10:34 PM, Richard ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
isn't that a track?
In 1847 it was the first trunk road into San Diego from the east. Then, as
other roads were built and traffic dwindled away, it lost importance and grade
down to a track, and finally S2 was built to
On Aug 29, 2015, at 12:08 AM, Andrew MacKinnon andrew...@gmail.com wrote:
Gardiner is still highway=motorway
If the construction doesn't impact the maxspeed, the lanes, the alignment, nor
the classification of the road - then its not really under construction. If the
road changes
On Aug 31, 2015, at 12:05 AM, Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com wrote:
uilding=commercial is quite suspect.
To me, there are 2 basic types of mixed use buildings.
mixed_use_urban
And
mixed_use_house
There are so many different combinations of retail, residential, hotel, and
Javbw
On Aug 30, 2015, at 4:17 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
suggests a proper entity. Landuse can be seen as a propery, I wouldn't use it
to constitute objects on their own.
A mall sits on one named landuse=retail.
A factory sits on landuse=industrial.
A
> On Aug 31, 2015, at 10:44 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> 3 storey buildings are normally quite different to 25 storey buildings for
> various reasons (e.g. safety regulations, usage intensity, ...)
Is there some easily understood dividing line between a
> On Sep 1, 2015, at 9:46 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> presently traverses a staircase!
I currently forget which, but a national road in Japan officially becomes a
staircase near its terminus, as the government managed "road" is significant
older than cars, and for
We might want some kind of generic "drop box" or "return box" - there are other
kinds of things that are returned (dvds, kerosene tanks, shoes, rental /loaned
items, etc.
It would be an item belonging to the business or location, so we may mot need
to tag what is returned.
You arent going
Im talking about how to tag the barrier. That thing was **tight** and very
unusual to find in a major urban area.
The amount of scars on the poles was amazing.
The hight restriction barrier (a common thing) is tagged along with maxheight -
this barrier seemed to be the same - if you are over
I think using it for pipes and waterways is a good thing, especially when used
with the way's inherent direction.
There are pipes, canals, and other waterways where both directions occur, but
like the incline tag, it is best to specify what direction the way's inherent
direction implies in
I use bollards all the time , guardrails too.
If i tagged it as you suggest, we wouldn't need any of the cycle barriers,
pinches, nor chicanes if they happened to be made of poles. we could use
bollards for it all.
The guardrails are there not to contain a car nor block access, they are
Javbw
> On Sep 3, 2015, at 12:17 AM, Daniel Koć wrote:
>
> It also means that real importance could be tagged one day instead of
> "official" importance, so we have at least something proper once people will
> have what they really want anyway. =}
Rant:
I agree that
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> From this it sounds like this tagging in OSM is relying too much on
> official classification rather than on real road importance.
And similar to someone printing out an email and faxing it to someone, we have
Javbw
On Aug 24, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
sent from a phone
Am 22.08.2015 um 02:37 schrieb John Willis jo...@mac.com:
We already define the religious buildings themselves through building=* and
the POW through amenity
On Aug 25, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
Everyone does not participate in all the OSM news sources. Thus people are
surprised when presented with stuff they had no idea of.
When I was a gamer, I played a lot of Blizzard games (WoW Diablo), and the
same situation
On Aug 24, 2015, at 9:15 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
sent from a phone
Am 22.08.2015 um 15:38 schrieb John Willis jo...@mac.com:
A school operated by a church on separate land with separate facilites is a
school. The sign out front says school
Leisure=pitch + sport•=*
Its not anout the markinggs - its about dedicated use.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch
I am not sure about the reservation system - but if it is a dedicated area for
sports of any kind, the area is a pitch.
If it is just a spot on a park
Javbw
> On Sep 15, 2015, at 5:27 PM, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote:
>
> our next problem is to identify the cultivars: not easy with cherries in
> Japan.
So there is nothing between
"This is a pear"
And
"This is the very specific cultivar of this variety of this pear.
?
I have no idea about this, but are there ways to tag zones in a theme park?
Trying to discern themes might be really difficult without a good list of
beginning themes.
Westernland and tomorrowland, etc, for example.
Is that cowboy and astronaut? The old west? Retro space? Pioneer times?
> On Sep 15, 2015, at 9:25 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>
> , they would not
> necessarily want to be shown playground locomotives.
>
> The idea for playground:theme=* came up when johnw was looking for labelling
> octopus-themed playgrounds in Japan (though he has not
Net is not a sport. "Putting green is also not a sport, so it is in golf=*
Sport=cricket
Cricket=net would be more in line with existing tagging schemes, especially the
sub-keys for sports with static and well defined features (like golf courses
and baseball diamonds).
But we're wondering of
I was using official_name=* for this already (like stores with ridiculously
long names) - I just realized this might be completely undocumented.
Javbw
> On Sep 27, 2015, at 8:37 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 27/09/2015 8:21 PM, Peter wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> we've detecting
Javbw
> On Sep 29, 2015, at 4:13 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> addr:floor is about the address, "level" is used more often.
What about situations where the level and the signed level don't match? Im not
trying to spatially locate the building for 3D rendering
> On Sep 30, 2015, at 6:58 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
>
>
> Actually, Taginfo says that addr:floor is used 4314 times (3162 on nodes):
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/addr:floor
I was reading the numbers off the wiki page - I guess there is an error in the
Javbw
> On Sep 30, 2015, at 12:38 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
>
> 2015-09-29 13:10 GMT+02:00 Eugene Alvin Villar :
>> > addr:floor is about the address, "level" is used more often.
>>
>> When addr:floor=* was first proposed a few years ago,
201 - 300 of 746 matches
Mail list logo