as amenity=place_of_worship - or is
that also a mistake?
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 7:13 AM wrote:
> Not important at all. I just think that if it is ancillary to the
> business of selling coffins, transporting corpses, preparing them for
> burial, doing paperwork in
There is already an existing tag with similar meaning for funeral homes /
funeral halls / funeral directors: shop=funeral_directors.
The use of the key "shop=" is odd, but it's been used over 20,000 times so
it seems to be well established:
The “rise” where the stream comes back to the surface would usually be
mapped as natural=spring
If there is also a cave entrance at the same spot where the watercourse
exits a cave, then the tag natural=cave_entrance can be used
- Joseph
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 6:21 AM Kevin Kenny wrote:
> On
=cave_entrance can also be used when a waterway
drops into a sinkhole or other open cave entrance, often found in limestone
(karst) geology areas.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:52 AM Paul Allen wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 17:07, Tod Fitch wrote:
>
>>
>> To
uite large, since there
are urban systems and tourist systems in flat regions (theme parks) as well
as mountain areas.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 8:04 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> 1) is bottom station always in valley?
> (
Re: status to indicate "was not voted upon but is widely used and
most people are happy with it"
That's the "de facto" status.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 6:09 AM Paul Allen wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 at 13:53, Matthew Woehlke
> wrote:
.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Maracaibo
So, does this mean that Lago de Maracaibo could be mapped as natural=water
or waterway=riverbank instead, if local mappers feel it is a lake rather
than a tidal bay / estuary?
(It is currently mapped with natural=coastline and with a relation tagged
as n
is the inclusion of Bahia Samborombon in the estuary. The
charts and satellite images show very little influence from river water in
that area, as well as in the section of coast east of Montevideo.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:42 PM wrote:
>
>
> - Mensaje original ---
river current at all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_River
By using the dominant currents as a definition, this allows local mappers
with knowledge of the water to determine the right tagging.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tag
~30 to 50 km (20 to 30 miles) wide till after Buenos Aires, then becomes
almost 100 km wide by the time it opens up at Montevideo and Samborombon
Bay. The people who named the rivers and the estuary recognized a
difference.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:23 PM Kevin Kenny wrote:
>
ge of the river. It would not prevent mapping the Hudson mouth
at the southern tip of Manhattan, because the flow is strong all the way to
New York Harbor, if I understand correctly.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:54 AM Kevin Kenny wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:59 PM Christo
would suggest that the natural=coastline should cross no farther
downstream than Quebec City, where the river widens into the huge lower
estuary.
Similarly, should Puget Sound and San Francisco Bay be mapped as
natural=water + water=river? These are also estuaries.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, Aug 4
d the
baseline as far out to sea as possible, so that they can claim a larger
area of ocean as an exclusive economic zone. This should not influence
tagging in OpenStreetMap, which needs to be based on real, verifiable,
physical characteristics.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:57
es in
your area which would fit the proposed definition, and then come back with
photos plus aerial imagery of the areas which ought to be mapped with this
tag. So far it has been mostly hypothetical, which makes it hard to
understand which sorts of landscapes would qualify for this tag.
- Joseph
bodies, including
bays, straits and estuaries, while also allowing local mappers to map their
river estuaries as they see fit.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:48 PM wrote:
>
>
> - Mensaje original -
> > De: "Christoph Hormann"
> > Para: "
u ask someone the name of the road in California with
ref="CA 96",
they will tell you "Highway 96" or perhaps "The river road". They won't say
"Nah, it doesn't have a name, just a State highway number."
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 3:08 PM Jmapb w
I agree.
Proof of this is that a section of road which was formerly US Highway 99,
but where the highway ref is now on a new bypass, will often by signed as
“Old Highway 99”, so it’s reasonable to say that the name=* was “Highway
99” before.
-Joseph Eisenberg
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:01 PM
In Indonesia, Costa Rica, Peru and Mexico, it is common to find 30cm kerbs
in older neighborhoods. In Nicaragua there were some that were at least 45
cm high, in Leon or Granada.
Tropical countries with heavy rainfall often do this to avoid flooding.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 7
A landuse=orchard is any area of perennial shrubs and trees which is used
to produce food. In the tropics this tag is used for bananas tea and
coffee, and oil date palms, all of which are not exactly “orchards” in the
British sense. This was proposed in the original vote.
So if Wikipedia is
added 1 year ago by a certain mapper:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/natural=sink_hole#map - I assume
this was a mistake.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 8:27 AM Tod Fitch wrote:
> It certainly would not be my pick of terms, but it seems manhole=drain has
> an appro
and it can be
tagged as landuse=meadow (even if it's not used for hay or grazing). But
before that, it's not clear if there is a tag for cropland that is
unplanted and temporarily fallow for a few months to 1 year.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 2:57 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Many desert climates can be mapped as natural=sand (for dunes and other
areas of sand), natural=bare_rock (for bedrock and large stones),
natural=scree, natural=shingle, or natural=heath (for areas of dwarf
shrubs), but we still need a tag for unvegetated areas which are not sand,
rock, stones or
rmation and Telecommunications Technologies*
> United Nations Global Service Centre
> United Nations Department of Operational Support
>
> Brindisi | Phone: +39 0831 056985 | Mobile: +39 3297193455 | Intermission:
> 158 6985
> E-mail: michael.mont...@un.org | www.ungsc.org
&
types of "barren"
land can already be mapped with existing tags. That's why it's important
that new tags are precisely defined.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 10:37 AM mbranco2 wrote:
> I hope that this discussion and the related proposal wiki page will lead
> to a s
r co-ops" -
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/090115/living-new-york-city-coops-vs-condos.asp
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 7:33 AM Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
> On 09/07/2020 21.51, Warin wrote:
> > On 9/7/20 12:44 am, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
ouse <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dhouse>, but
keeping at least two nodes in common for adjoining houses."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace
If you map each house individually, it is not necessary to map the whole
outline of the row of house
ues "coffee_shop" and "bubble_tea" are both documented,
"cuisine=juice" has been used over 1400 times, and "cuisine=tea" is also in
use a few hundred times.
I think using that key is reasonable, though developing more specific tags
is also an option.
– Joseph Eise
I would expect a "shop=mobile_phone" to sell mobile phones, so your first
option of "shop=mobile_phone_accessories" is best, though
"shop=phone_accessories" is also a good option.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:30 AM Francesco Ansanelli
wrot
which sell
brewed tea. See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Vvi
Here in Oregon we have a Boba tea place which is tagged shop=tea -
http://bobahead.com - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7058798286
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:02 AM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> Am Fr., 26. Juni
n also add usage=irrigation or another
appropriate value of usage=*, and width=*
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:12 AM Walker Bradley
wrote:
> I concur that historic or heritage should be secondary tags.
>
> Regarding man_made=qanat versus canal=qanat, it is wor
ces always sell coffee, unlike a Bubble Tea shop.
I find it quite strange that amenity=cafe is being suggested for tea shops,
bagel shops and donut shops on the wiki.
This seems to be based on some cultural assumptions about what is a "cafe"
in European contexts, but this does not match us
thing like
Role:main and Role:alternative?
Or is it best to make up a new general page to describe them all, like "Roles
for route relations
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Roles_for_route_relations=edit=1>
"?
– Joseph Eisenberg
-pubs/?cid=fseprd533703=full
I advocated for mapping the outer boundary since land ownership is not
something we normally map, but other mappers are saying that the land
ownership is more verifiable than the declared boundary and more
important for actual protection status and access.
– Joseph Eisenberg
O
?)
In other countries, how are National Park and other protected_area
boundaries determined? If there are villages or towns within the boundary,
are they actually protected? Are they excluded from the area?
– Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging
;
I can see how canoes and kayaks are basically the same, since both are
narrow boats that usually carry 1 or 2 people and are propelled by paddles.
But should rowboat access restrictions be under this key
canoe=yes/no/designated, or are they under boat=yes/no/des
Thank you, I had intended to try to find out who was using that tag,
myself, so it was very helpful to contact them.
Glad to hear that the mappers using man_made=qanat are happy to change to
this tag.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 3:07 PM Joseph Guillaume
wrote:
>
>
t sure of both, the definitions of free flow and pipe.
A qanat is not built with pipes or a pipeline for transmission of the water.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 3:31 PM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> On 20. Jun 2020, at 20:39, Jose
can aqueducts used for
drinking water, so tagging usage=irrigation and width=*, while using the
existing main tag, is probably reasonable.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 5:17 AM Christoph Hormann wrote:
>
> I think this is a good idea. Both in the sense of establishing a
minimising evaporation)
- Construction and maintenance is through vertical shafts, which are then
visible on the surface
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 11:24 AM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 20. Jun 2020, at 14:17, Christoph Hormann
deling / repairs.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 11:08 AM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 20. Jun 2020, at 14:44, Paul Allen wrote:
> >
> > They should probably have disused=yes or a disused lifecycle
> > prefix (cue endless
nt main
tag just because the shafts aren't visible for one reason or the other
(e.g. hidden on purpose)
Sometimes there are small walls or caps over the shafts to prevent sand or
dirt from falling in. I was considering that to be still "visible
s are also found
around the Mediterranean, as far as Spain, and from there they were also
brought to the Americas. But they are most commonly found in North Africa,
West Asia and Central Asia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qanat#/media/File:Qanat_technology_diffusion.svg
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Fri, J
his proposal if it's debatable, but it
would be nice to approve a way to map the shafts as well, since they are
visible on survey and in aerial imagery.
Please comment here or at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Qanat
– Joseph Eisenberg
___
Are there any examples of a type=site relation used with a natural=*
feature tag where this is appropriate?
In the list of combinations natural=* is not shown (less than 1000 uses):
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/type=site#combinations
About 50% of current site relations are from an
relation for all of the ways
which comprise a highway=raceway circuit?
Do you have some examples of existing objects which you would want to
re-tag?
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:00 AM Richard Welty
wrote:
> there is a long stalled proposal for a relation type of circuit for
> ha
ail for the vast majority of systems which are 3rd rail?
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 9:50 AM Garry Keenor wrote:
>
> Paul - thanks for the response. I struggle with the idea that someone
would know that a route is electrified with a ground level contact system,
but not how m
ious leisure activities - hiking, cycling, or as jeep/ATV
trails."
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 4:53 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 05:47, Tod Fitch wrote:
>
>>
>> “Greenway” [1] was a term unknown to me too
>&
ide to drive a small car down it. That is not a
highway=track, its a sidewalk.
Most paths and footways in urban parks are more than 2 meters wide. They
are not tracks.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:55 PM brad wrote:
> It already says this:
> "Some
>
>
>>
>> & is there any reason *not* to add things to the map features page?
>>
>
> Things that are rarely mapped are not good candidates for a page listing
> things that are frequently mapped.
>
>
Right now there are 105 documented tags with the key "man_made:", and only
50 of these are listed
USA and in South America:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=man_made=spoil_heap#map
The one issue is whether it is clearly different than landuse=landfill.
Thoughts on whether this tag is common enough and well established enough
that it should be on M
to describe that the wetland area is only part of the year.
However, if the wetland has different vegetation, it might be a bog, fen,
marsh etc, then you should use wetland=bog/fen/marsh as appropriate, and
exclude the wetland area from the natural=scrub area.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, Jun 2
ss=destination), I would expect more requests to correct this
in applications
Most people who ride bikes will want to avoided any places where
dismounting is required. It is usually faster to take a different route.
Only rarely will it be worthwhile to use a way with bicyc
ave extensive networks of
unpaved paths between remote villages in deserts, mountains and tropical
forests where there are no roads for 2-track motor vehicles.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 12:12 PM Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 03:03:40PM -0400, Kevin Kenny
://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Railways#Abandoned_railways_where_all_evidence_has_been_removed
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 9:40 PM Jack Armstrong
wrote:
> Greetings.
>
>
> Recently, a user mapped “razed” railways inside a construction zone (link
> below). These rails had been remov
That looks correct.
According to the aerial imagery these are private parking spaces which are
directly accessible from the street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?#map=20/37.40423/-121.99958
So amenity=parking + access=private is a reasonable way to map this.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Fri
he
way if you look along the way direction. But which one comes first in the
value?
Is the proposal suggesting to use a vertical line as the separator instead
of a semicolon? So "line_management=branch|straight" would be used when
there are two circuits and one goes straight at the tower, a
vel
to compacted to dirt frequently, but not necessary).
In the short term, it's okay to tag an estimated, average width. If it's 1
to 0.3 meters, use 0.5 - this still shows a difference from a path which is
1.5 to 4 meters wide (which you might estimate as 2.5 meters?).
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Fri,
or
business-related service roads, rather than residential driveways.
– Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
worker"
Comparing the 3 countries, all are health facilities at the village or
neighborhood level which provide health care via workers who do not have as
much formal training. I would agree that most of these workers might be
called "community health workers" as a general term, tho
ave an example of a particular path or road which is debatable?
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:10 AM Mike Thompson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just because a trail is wide enough to accommodate a four wheeled
> vehicle does that make it highway=track if it was constructed
" are vague, however.
I would suggest trying to fit with the theme of using the type of health
worker as the name of the feature (doctors, nurse, dentist, etc.), so we
could have amenity=village_health_worker or
healthcare=community_health_worker or something like that.
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue,
rule", or the ability
to make their own laws, for example in French-infuenced areas?
What is the minimum qualification for a boundary to be considered a
boundary=administrative with an admin_level in your country?
-- Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing li
etc.
-Joseph Eisenberg
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:04 AM Marc M. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 10.05.20 à 01:24, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
> > imagine you are ordering a taxi for yourself and 2 colleagues to the
> > airport and instead of a taxi (cab) they send y
François,
Have you personally hired a motorcycle before, or is the assumption that
this is the same service based on theory rather than experience?
The proposal gave several reasons that using amenity=taxi was not a good
idea, including these:
"Motorcyles have different abilities.
"In contrast
n helpful in preventing bad ideas from being approved without
consensus.
But it has made it more likely that a proposal will not be approved, even
though the majority accepts it.
--Joseph Eisenberg
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 3:21 PM Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 09:05, s8evq wrote:
&g
The tag motorcycle=yes is already documented as defining legal access
restrictions for motorcycle riders, like access=yes or foot=yes
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:motorcycle%3Dyes
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 1:34 PM Florimond Berthoux <
florimond.berth...@gmail.
For the record, I responded to Marc Marc’s comment on this list, and there
was not a response back:
“ On 2/20/20, marc marc wrote:
> Le 20.02.20 à 12:45, Joseph Eisenberg a écrit :
>> Can't we have an easy to use top-level feature tag, instead of having
>> to add 3 tags li
n the West?
-- Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> Something like: man_made=bells + bells=carillon for the larger
instruments and man_made=bells + bells=chime for the smaller ones.
That makes sense. Also, "bells" is easier to translate into most languages.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 9:57 AM Adam Franco wrote:
+1 to using man_made=carillon or =bells.
Don’t use attraction because that is for carousels and roller coasters and
similar things in amusement parks, mostly.
—Joseph Eisenberg
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:18 AM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 7.
s" - added back
in 2012:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:ele=811890
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 1:58 PM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> >> On 4. May 2020, at 18:54, Greg Troxel wrote:
> > This really
We stopped rendering it, but we didn’t edit the wiki page to set the status
to “deprecated”. Many tags are not rendered because they are ambiguous
(e.g. natural=fell) but that doesn’t mean they are deprecated.
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 9:34 AM Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 03/05/2020 17:13, Jos
region, database
users who are looking at the whole globe will have trouble interpreting
what it means.
That's why it would be better to propose a new, different tag to map open
areas of unvegetated land in villages and towns.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
=common:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=common
The existing tag is leisure=common -
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=common
-- Joseph Eisenberg
— Joseph Eisenberg
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 8:14 AM Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> So, this discussion gravitates towa
ineyards, etc. - though
certainly there are some meadows or orchards or farmyards that are
currently tagged as landuse=farmland for various reasons. I have not seen
any scrub or semi-desert rangeland tagged as landuse=farmland.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:58 PM Warin <61sundow...@
. (We're working on it:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3399)
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:00 AM Paul Allen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 18:46, Mike Thompson wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have always been under the impression tha
> wetland area within a forest where trees are growing also within the
wetland area
That’s a “swamp”: natural=wetland + wetland=swamp
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:wetland%3Dswamp
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swamp#Differences_between_marshes_and_swamps
ers to interpret what it means.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 1:41 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Apr 29, 2020, 21:37 by skqu...@rushpost.com:
>
> On 4/29/20 14:34, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
>
> Here is a 360° pict
But healthcare=pharmacy was never proposed.
It was added by a preset in iD.
At the time the key “healthcare=“ was proposed, the idea of changing
amenity=pharmacy was opposed by several mappers during the RFC period (in
2010), so the idea to change to shop=pharmacy was dropped.
—Joseph Eisenberg
for this: consider that hospitals are
mapped as amenity=hospital and a doctor's surgery (office) is
amenity=doctors.
There is no point in using 2 synonymous tags to map one feature.
We should just use the established tag amenity=pharmacy and deprecate
healthcare=pharmacy
-- Joseph Eisenberg
y=pharmacy. This will make it clear that healthcare=pharmacy is not
needed and should be deprecated.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
itn_17_4_trail_difficulty.html
Can other mappers who use this tag frequently confirm whether it is limited
to specifically designed and built bike trails, like those found in
"bikeparks"?
-- Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mail
The heritage:operator tag is needed because “operator=“ is the operator of
the feature, not the operator of the heritage status.
If you have an old residential building which is still in active use, the
operator= is whoever manages the building now, but it might also have a
heritage:operator=
t; for
the "hertiage" designation, versus some other characteristic of the
feature. Is there any real-world case where this would be true?
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 4/21/20, António Madeira wrote:
> So, I would like to know what would be the technical pros and cons
> regarding heritage:re
e than social. While there are non-medical "nursing homes",
these are under "assisted_living" or "group_home".
I would suggest deprecating social_facility=hospice, and I'm also not
convinced that social_facility=nursing_home is better than
amenity=nursing_home.
-- Joseph Eise
be in favor of separating out the non-residential social
services from the full-time residential facilities?
This would be similar to how we use different tags for hospitals
(inpatient - you stay overnight) and doctor's offices / clinics
(outpatient).
-- Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
ge this because there really is no way to tell which of the
> properties (e.g. name) belongs to the building and which to the business.
+1
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 4/20/20, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> On 19.04.20 20:33, Paul Allen wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 19:29, Justin Tracey > <
I agree that a tag like "public_transportation=yes" would be a
sensible tag to add to a aerialway=station which is used as public
transit, and "public_transportation=no" could be useful for a
"railway=station" or "highway=bus_stop" which is not used
/Key:industrial
Do we need another tag like man_made=distribution_centre, or is
landuse + building enough in this case?
See also discussion at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:shop%3Dseafood#Wholesale_fish_markets.2C_seafood_processing
-- Joseph Eisenberg
in other languages?
-- Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
users, who will expect a taxicab (motorcar) stand
with that tag
-- Joseph Eisenberg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
rol if it is outside of the levees/dykes and
wouldn't actually be flooded.)
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 4/15/20, John Willis via Tagging wrote:
> When mapping stormwater reservoirs and basins here in Japan, they often have
> a mappable landuse around them - the land around the basin is controlled
query.
But it takes more time for each mapper to add 2 tags instead of one.
Mapper time is the most precious resource in OpenStreetMap: we don't
have enough mappers, and most are working for free, for fun.
Let's make things as easy as possible for mappers: one tag for one main feature.
-- Joseph
to specialize.
Is that also true in Argentina?
(If you want to use a subtag, another option would be office=company
(very common tag) + company=health_insurance or something like that)
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 4/14/20, Agustin Rissoli wrote:
> In Argentina we want to correctly tagging offi
his case, and especially for a smaller sandpit.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 4/13/20, Sören Reinecke via Tagging wrote:
> Due to your feedback I will cancel the proposal. AGAIN: What you say is
> 100% correct. This proposal's purpose was just to simplify what seems
> unclear to many (not al
ervices/nhs/a4502/a-to-z-of-hospital-departments/
BTW, what is the most common term for an "emergency department" in the UK?
Is it still "Emergency Ward" or "Accident and Emergency Ward" or
something different
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 4/13/20, Paul Allen wrote:
> O
n which case amenity=clinic is fine. If they admit
inpatients into a special part of the hospital, then a new tag like
healthcare=department / hospital_department is a good idea.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 4/13/20, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13/4/20 7:27 pm, Rory McCann wrot
penstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:dispensing
"description=DOH HIV Treatment Hub" - it would be better to add this
as a tag, like "hiv_treatment_hub=yes" rather than use description
(I also would not add healthcare=clinic or healthcare=hospital - just
use amenity=hospital or amenity=c
t seems overlong and complex, so it would not
have been my first choice:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/medical_service%3Aantiretroviral_therapy
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 4/13/20, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> At present there is the key healtcare.
>
> https://
.
Maybe "pump_driver=*" is a better key?
-- Joseph Eisenberg
On 4/13/20, François Lacombe wrote:
> Hi all
>
> RFC on pumping proposal is went really well, with significant progresses
> made these past weeks thanks to useful comments received (see Talk).
> https://wiki.openstre
101 - 200 of 1088 matches
Mail list logo
