Re: [Tagging] Fwd: How to tag: public lands that are accessed by permit?

2016-07-20 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Yep. I asked a similar question at > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-February/028504.html > but there was no particular consensus. > > access=permit seems to have moderate usage (slightly

[Tagging] Fwd: How to tag: public lands that are accessed by permit?

2016-07-20 Thread Kevin Kenny
Oops, accidentally sent this from the wrong mailbox again. On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: > > Also, we aren't being consistent with such a strict definition. There > are many shopping malls near me, and the ways have no access tags. > That's wrong, as they

Re: [Tagging] How to tag: public lands that are accessed by permit?

2016-07-19 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com > wrote: > > 2016-07-19 22:01 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+...@gmail.com>: > >> The High Peaks Wilderness is a lot more like a public park than it is >> like your driveway. Sh

[Tagging] Fwd: How to tag: public lands that are accessed by permit?

2016-07-19 Thread Kevin Kenny
Oops - sent this message from the wrong mailbox and it either bounced or got flagged for moderation. -- Forwarded message -- From: Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:42 PM Subject: Re: [Tagging] How to tag: public lands that are accessed by

Re: [Tagging] How to tag: public lands that are accessed by permit?

2016-07-19 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> Il giorno 19 lug 2016, alle ore 20:41, Colin Smale ha scritto: >> >> If you need explicit permission, it's access=private, even if there are loads of people with that explicit

[Tagging] How to tag: public lands that are accessed by permit?

2016-07-19 Thread Kevin Kenny
Gentlebeings, In a discussion today on 'imports,' Martin Koppenhoefer raised a concern that appears to have no answer in current tagging practice. I suspect that it's yet another case where a fairly common case in the US violates a hidden cultural assumption in OSM's data model. The case in

<    2   3   4   5   6   7