I would agree that a 'link' should be tagged as a approach. That way we
don't have to cover any complicated special cases like a trail that leads
to a station and a new trail. And actually the difference between links is
not that big.
Michael
Am Do., 12. Dez. 2019 um 10:31 Uhr schrieb Peter
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/hiking_trail_relation_roles
There is no unique way to tag roles in hiking route relations although they
carry a high potential for the rendering of hiking trails. This proposal
was requsted by Sarah Hoffmann on the FOSSGIS conference. A only
thout assigning the
> roles)
>
> Or would both methods be accepted?
>
> Personally, I find method 2 a bit more practical for mapping.
>
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 10:15:31 +, Michael Behrens
> wrote:
>
> >
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/hikin
I fully agree with this argument and I also wrote a comment on the Wiki
Talk page.
What do you thing about using main:forward, main:backward,
alternative:forward and alternative:backward.
Another problem is that whenever there the main trail has a forward or
backward we automatically have two
way both of the possible ways to map hiking trails are combined
into one way.--Mfbehrens99
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mfbehrens99> (talk
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Mfbehrens99>) 14:17, 8
December 2019 (UTC)
Am So., 8. Dez. 2019 um 13:21 Uhr schrieb Mic
