s it’s own building=* area? Where would you use the tag terraced=yes or terraced=apartments? On a building:part=* or on individually drawn building=house areas? -Joseph On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 7:33 AM Oliver Simmons <oliversi...@gmail.com> wrote:For terraced houses `building=terrace` is used f
uce that they are terraced from the
> geometry.
> --
> Andrew
>
> ------
> *From:* Oliver Simmons
> *Sent:* 07 September 2020 15:30
> *To:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <
> tagging@openstreetmap.org>
> *Subject:* [Tagging
Does anyone know if this tagging: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ProposedRoofLinesIs accepted and ok to use? It has “proposed” in the title but there’s none of the usual proposal stuff saying if it was accepted or not. I was wanting to use it but thought I would ask first.Thanks :)- Oliver
For terraced houses `building=terrace` is used for the whole block,
but there is no tag for each individual building when they are separate,
the reason for this is because the terraced building could be any of the
`building=*` values, a shop, a house e.t.c, it could even be a weird small
church;
Doing this would make over 3M objects have their date updated to the
present, when the last meaningful change may have been over 5 years ago.
It creates the illusion of data being up-to-date when all that was changed
was a tag key.
On Sun, 18 Oct 2020, 22:02 Graeme Fitzpatrick,
wrote:
>
>
>
>
I agree with the `hostile_architecture=` tag as this could be expanded on
in the future.
Other types of common hostile architecture I know of:
- sloped bus stop benches
- spikes on the floor
- bike racks in annoying places
I propose `hostile_architecture=spikes`
and `hostile_architecture=yes`
On Sun, 23 Aug 2020, 17:38 Oliver Simmons, wrote:
> I agree with the `hostile_architecture=` tag as this could be expanded on
> in the future.
>
> Other types of common hostile architecture I know of:
> - sloped bus stop benches
> - spikes on the floor
> - bike racks in
a phone
>
> > On 23. Aug 2020, at 18:40, Oliver Simmons wrote:
> >
> > I agree with the `hostile_architecture=` tag as this could be expanded
> on in the future
>
>
> I can see the point, but it is probably not verifiable in many instances
> (it could be seen
It seems highly strange that you wouldn't even be allowed to carry/push
your bike, are you sure that was what it meant?
Do you have a picture of the sign?
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020, 22:50 Allroads, wrote:
> There lots of forest roads/path, where the bicycle/pushed carried is
> prohibited. Mostly,
Agreed that is beyond being a curb, it is a wall of sorts.
For it to be a curb in my opinion, it should be passable by a fit
(non-disabled) person easily,
Once it becomes too tall to pass it is a wall
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020, 01:17 Jarek Piórkowski, wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 19:46, Martin
Agreed, if we are doing this once, we better have a way to do it again as doing it once guarantees that it will happen for another tag in the future. Changing in inside OSM and the OSM Wiki is the easier part though, it’s informing and getting all of the software to recognise the new tag
This is correct, the biggest example is the highway=* values. There are few exception to this rule where using British English could cause confusing.e.g. sidewalk, this is a more American term, but is used because “pavement” (what we call them in Britain) can have multiple meanings. From: Phake
NickSent: 21 October 2020 15:28To: Tag discussion, strategy and related toolsSubject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Artificial 在 2020年10月21日週三 17:37，Oliver Simmons <oliversi...@gmail.com> 寫道：Agreed, if we are doing this once, we better have a way to do it again as doing it once guar
13 matches
Mail list logo
