It may be common in some areas to allow pitching tents anywhere within a
designated area. But I have mapped a couple of backcountry (backpack) trail
camps that have a numbered post at each pitch, so I know that they do exist and
we ought to allow for it. In the two cases I can think of at the
On May 1, 2015, at 5:05 PM, David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net wrote:
Tod, nice work but I am concerned about the syntax you have chosen for
two reasons.
1. Given that it was agreed that the larger site is the camp_site and
there are pitch within the camp_site (UK terminology), then
On May 1, 2015, at 12:12 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
For those of you mapping campgrounds, what improvements might you want in
rendering?
Keep in mind there's presently no process for voting for main map rendering.
On Apr 30, 2015, at 8:12 AM, Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on addr:unit or ref over addr:housenumber. I think ref makes more sense
than addr:unit on remote/isolated pitches (ie hike-in sites, not drive-in).
In addition, I've seen cases where individual pitches are
the proposal.
Cheers,
Tod
On May 1, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com
mailto:t...@fitchdesign.com wrote:
Most public campgrounds in US Forests, US Parks and, at least in California,
state parks don’t
Comments interspersed. . .
On Apr 29, 2015, at 2:57 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
Ok, lets see if we can land this.
Existing practice varies:
tourism=camp_site + name=pitch number
tourism=camp_site + ref=pitch number
tourism=camp_site + addr:unit=pitch number
On Apr 29, 2015, at 4:15 PM, David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net wrote:
Several months ago we were advised that a camp_site is the larger site
that contains one or (usually) more pitches. Therefore to say that a
particular instance of a camp_site is a pitch is just plain silly.
Except,
If the individual pitches are part of a campground that has a street address
then in makes sense.
But many campgrounds run by the US Forest Service and other state and local
parks do not have street addresses even if they are located on roads. And there
are backcountry campgrounds with
Some places have individual tent locations but no street address:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/34.80931/-119.17480layers=D
On April 22, 2015 7:51:26 AM PDT, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Apr 18, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Am 18.04.2015 um 06:31 schrieb Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com:
FWIW, on a mountain where I volunteer I mapped the campgrounds with the
tagging shown on the proposed extensions page which uses ref
On April 17, 2015 3:40:41 AM PDT, Craig Wallace craig...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On 2015-04-17 07:39, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
If you entered Pinnacles Campground Site 12 into your OSM powered
GPS,
would you not be happy if it took you all the way to Site 12?
Yes, but I don't think addr:housenumber
Please also see at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_camp_site#Tagging_of_individual_pitches
Sorry that I can't comment on the area originally linked to but I am currently
in the mountains with only a mobile phone and a lousy connection so I am having
difficulty
FWIW, on a mountain where I volunteer I mapped the campgrounds with the tagging
shown on the proposed extensions page which uses ref=* instead of addr:street
or addr:unit.
I have also generated paper maps off that OSM data. Local fire people saw one
and were impressed and asked for a copy.
On Apr 9, 2015, at 5:43 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is just a suggestion in the wiki, everybody using the data will
ultimately have to decide on their own how to extrapolate missing
information. In Europe I'd probably assume km/h as default, but if I ran
“Supported” by whom? To me that implies that a number of data consumers/renders
will use that data.
I personally interpret a voted on wiki proposal as “recommended”.
Tod
On Apr 3, 2015, at 7:49 AM, Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com wrote:
Is supported reasonable?
On Fri, Apr 3,
On Mar 29, 2015, at 10:44 PM, Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com wrote:
I decided not to include the scout camp, because it then still might be
confused with a place where ordinary campers can stay (like is the case with
all options in the proposal). After the long discussion I have
On Mar 30, 2015, at 1:05 AM, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:
Okay - I have a question - If Jan’s proposal sets the basic category, And
this one sets the amenity level, Is is possible to base this around access to
the spaces? it seems to set the whole tone of the camp.
RV Caravan / car
On Mar 19, 2015, at 3:28 PM, Kotya Karapetyan kotya.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I am wondering: If so many people think that forum is better, and if OSM
actually provides a forum (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/), how comes that we have this discussion?
Why
On Mar 19, 2015, at 9:00 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
+1 on the change to a 75% threshold for voting. Negativity indicates the
proposal needs work.
Those with trouble scanning mailing lists should look into threading
options for their mail
client, or read discussions
+1
On Mar 17, 2015, at 7:04 AM, Kotya Karapetyan wrote:
Dear all,
I think we deviated from the original question quite a bit. The point was
that the current number of votes proposed in the wiki for accepted/rejected
decision was self-contradicting. Even if there may be different opinions
On Mar 14, 2015, at 4:14 PM, John Willis wrote:
. . .
Also - is there some way to tag if the campsites have a (raised) platform of
some kind for the tents?
There are several camps I can think of - US Boy Scout camps and rent-a-tent
sites in Japan that have somewhat permanent tent
On Mar 14, 2015, at 3:48 PM, Warin wrote:
On 15/03/2015 3:37 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com
wrote:
There is no mention of one very common type of camp_site, the campground
inside a National Park. It is a definitely a
On Mar 12, 2015, at 10:40 AM, Andreas Labres wrote:
Sorry, but amenity= is the wrong key. Should be tourism= IMHO.
Tourism for the reception desk for visitors, most likely only business or
invited individuals, at a facility of International Corp? That sounds wrong to
me.
Not sure if it
On Mar 8, 2015, at 10:55 PM, johnw wrote:
If I knew nothing about the structure of government, just the buildings on
the ground, I would notice that the “city hall” for many towns and small
cities often (but not always) have combined complexes for both the assembly
and mayor, and often
On Mar 8, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
I question this usage, mostly because UK Scouts seem to match US usage, which
would call what you're calling a hike more like a march, or if it's
really bad, a death march. US Scouts might hyperbolize intentionally to
Rattan Death March for
On Mar 4, 2015, at 6:03 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Russell Deffner russell.deff...@hotosm.org
wrote:
Maybe someone can confirm this, but I think it might actually be the
difference in language from the Park Service versus Forest Service; i.e. in a
National
On Mar 4, 2015, at 10:25 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
tourism=information May include Tourist information centres and offices.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dinformation
information=officeAn office where you can get information about a town
or region.
On Feb 17, 2015, at 9:14 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
It would also be good to have a tag for a site accepting household toxic
wastes such as used batteries, cleaning chemicals, leftover paint, and the
like. Here in Nashville, Tennessee, USA, such substances are not supposed to
included
On Feb 1, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Warin wrote:
On 2/02/2015 10:22 AM, Tod Fitch wrote:
On Feb 1, 2015, at 2:50 PM, David Bannon wrote:
I would like to have some of the items on Extend_camp_site page brought onto
the main camp_site page. Specifically the site/pitch specific tags at
http
On Feb 1, 2015, at 2:50 PM, David Bannon wrote:
Subject Was - RFD Camp ground Kitchens and their fittings
On Sun, 2015-02-01 at 09:47 -0600, Paul Johnson wrote:
Another one: caravan sites. There's not any way to cleanly
distinguish one at a state park that, save for the campground
On Feb 1, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
The
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Extend_camp_site
is quite a comprehensive proposal. One small thing I noticed in that one is
that waterway=water_point should be changed to amenity=water_point, to be
the wiki edits
suggested by another response on this thread.
Tod
On February 1, 2015 4:43:30 PM PST, David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net
wrote:
On Sun, 2015-02-01 at 15:22 -0800, Tod Fitch wrote:
.
I would like to have some of the items on Extend_camp_site page
brought onto the main
On Jan 25, 2015, at 8:20 AM, Steve Doerr wrote:
In English, we often call this the 'dedication' of the church. This can
include things like Holy Cross (Sacré Cœur) which are obviously not saints.
--
Steve
I know nothing about who churches are dedicated to, but wouldn't Sacré Cœur
software will have to deal with all
the existing ways things are done now. But standardizing on way to go forward
should help in the future.
Cheers,
Tod Fitch
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Sat Jan 17 21:27:13 UTC 2015
Less work if intermittent is simply used without the frequency extension
.. thus:
intermittent=yes/no/winter/spring/summer/autum/seasonal/ephemeral (default
assumption of no)
Note 'fall' = northern American english,
On Jan 17, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Richard Z. wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 07:50:36AM -0800, Tod Fitch wrote:
Based on where I sometimes see old wind driven pumps, I'd guess that many
longer (10s of miles long) washes have an underground flow.
I think so.
On the other hand
wrote:
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 12:14:53 -0800
From: Tod Fitch
t...@fitchdesign.com
The more I think about this issue the more I am coming to the feeling that
waterway=wadi ought to be deprecated and we should come up with a way of
further defining intermittent to distinguish between
Since we are supposed to use British English, I decided to look up wadi in my
old paper edition of the Oxford English Dictionary (can we trust that more than
Wikipedia?):
Wadi or Wady [Arabic: وادي wādī] In certain Arabic speaking countries, a
ravine or valley which in the rainy season
Since the current term wadi can mean something more than the actual
watercourse, why not drop it and use ephemeral=yes or
intermittent=ephemeral on waterway=* to indicate that it carries water much
less often than a waterway tagged with intermittent=yes?
On Jan 14, 2015, at 8:28 AM, Wolfgang Zenker wrote:
* Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com [150114 15:45]:
waterway=wadi is used (18 180 times) and has some support (for example JOSM
and default map style).
During implementing rendering of intermittent=yes I discovered major
problem with
On Dec 19, 2014, at 9:34 AM, Philip Barnes wrote:
And please make this childrens_area, kids is a slang word and is not
appropriate in formal english, such as OSM tagging.
Unless, of course, it is an area where young goats are kept. :)
___
If I recall correctly from a discussion on the Talk-us list a while back, the
preferred way in the US is now to specify the shield in a route relation. I did
not follow the discussion fully but my impression is that the tagging allowed
for custom specification of the shield. It looks like
As a as seasonal volunteer with the US Forest Service I have a little more
nuanced view: In the area I help out at there two big things on the long list
of causes for the FS to stop showing water as potable.
First, water quality standards have been tightened over the years so some
natural
On Sep 21, 2014, at 7:34 AM, Pee Wee wrote:
Well if an unpaved forest path would get gravel or fine_gravel thrown on top
of it I would consider this some sort of paving that could be classified as
paved. You apparently don't. No need to argue about that , it only goes to
show that the
On Sep 20, 2014, at 4:00 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 09/20/2014 05:42 PM, Tomasz Kaźmierczak wrote:
I would like to suggest making the paved key for highways (and probably
other types of elements) official.
had to add that or not.
Thank you for having plans to add support for this in the main renderer!
Tod
On Aug 24, 2014, at 2:48 AM, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 23 August 2014 22:52, Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com wrote:
With at least one renderer that I am looking at, the default database
In the southwest of the United States there are numerous features locally
called a wash which is an intermittent natural drainage channel that only
carries water during and immediately after large rainstorms. The ones I've
looked at in my area of interest are typically tagged waterway=stream,
On Aug 14, 2014, at 8:02 AM, Richard Z. wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:48:35PM -0400, David K wrote:
I support a general tag for hill crests with sufficient vertical curvature
to introduce a visibility, grounding, or takeoff hazard. It could be
applied to railroad crossings, humpy
On Aug 11, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Richard Z. wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:40:57AM +0200, Colin Smale wrote:
Hi,
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1263/1186115057_7f88a4aaed_o.jpg
looks like a landmark or tourist attraction to me and a narrow single
lane bridge. The speed limiting factor
On Aug 3, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Your comment suggests that fast food and restaurant are mutually
exclusive; they are not.
Google finds about 5,110,000 results for fast food restaurant,
with quotes; the first of which is the Wikipedia article:
On Jul 26, 2014, at 9:00 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 26/lug/2014 um 14:04 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
Scale is not relevant here, almost all industrial and farming activities are
performed on large and small scale.
maybe there is a language problem, to
On Jul 20, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
What if there's more than one lane that's both ways allowing left turns?
I've actually seen this, and the centre_turn_lane thing breaks down in such a
case.
I don't recall seeing that and am having a hard time imagining how it would
look
On Jul 10, 2014, at 2:20 PM, Jesse Crawford wrote:
An example situation is visible here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/34.05688/-106.89005
Both California St and the nearby I-25 are two-way streets made up of two
parallel one-way streets. This has the advantage of thorough data,
On Jul 9, 2014, at 2:07 AM, François Lacombe wrote:
JOSM already asking you a voltage=* tag on any power=* object.
Which I, as a mapper more interested in roads and trails, ignore as I don't
know what to put there and I'd rather have nothing than something that is wrong.
Many of the
On Jul 3, 2014, at 6:40 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
this essentially can be condensed to length of runway, because this implies
bigger airplanes, and bigger airplanes tend to fly longer distances. If there
is a small airfield close to the border, you might have international
(regional)
As a US English speaker, I'd call those items in your photo lockers.
My 40+ year old American Heritage Dictionary says, among other things that a
locker is an enclosure that may be locked, especially one used by a person at
a gymnasium or public place, for the safekeeping of clothing and
How would you tag this intersection in Mountain View, California?
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Mountain+View,+CA/@37.387343,-122.080352,3a,89.9y,118.3h,70.82t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sHblffm0KZ7pzUXLakrlBQw!2e0!4m2!3m1!1s0x808fb7495bec0189:0x7c17d44a466baf9b
Should it be tagged as
Am I missing the fact that we have history on all changes and you can detect
from the history when some tag like surface=unpaved was added to a way?
So that takes care of the initial survey date. Maybe added a *:confirmed=yes
where * is the tag (e.g. surface:confirmed=yes) if it is still
On Jun 5, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Am 04.06.2014 22:35, schrieb André Pirard:
That's another new tagging system though. And even doing it like this
breaks down when there is more than one shop in the building.
Therefore I believe that the only really clean solution is to
Any decent router will totally ignore a noexit=yes tag as it determines the
topology from the actual ways and how they are connected.
The noexit=yes tag serves only one purpose and has two different data
consumers: the next human mapper that comes along and automated QA tools. It
allows those
None of the area I am in has had turn lanes tagged per
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#Turning_indications_per_lane or
destinations set per
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination:lanes#Destinations_per_lane
When I start doing new tagging, I like to find existing tools
On May 18, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Andreas Goss wrote:
Am 5/18/14 14:43 , schrieb John Packer:
Honest question: are there capitals for something besides countries and
states?
If not, we could keep it simple:
* capital=yes for country capitals
* state_capital=yes for state capitals (already in
Seems like many (most?) of the people interested in mapping ski areas have
taken the piste mapping page at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Piste_Maps to heart. And,
just checking, I see a number that have had a site=piste relation for some
time. So I think the people
On Apr 13, 2014, at 11:28 PM, Peter Wendorff wrote:
Agree partly. It's not meaningless, but it get's ambiguous very often.
Take traffic signals as one example where the direction might be used:
Besides an intersection someone could add the traffic lights on the four
individual ways (instead
On Apr 11, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 17:28 +0100, SomeoneElse wrote:
Currently, there are 41,000 things tagged access=designated (1). I can
understand what =designated means for a specifc transport type (foot,
bicycle, etc.) but not access. The wiki (2)
On Apr 8, 2014, at 3:10 AM, Pieren wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:48 AM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Please, return to earth. Tagging traffic signs is just a funny
activity in fully mapped areas. How do you specify a speed limit in
OSM ? with a traffic_sign tag on a node or
What about for the area where the town hall, city administration buildings
(offices for building and safety, parks and recreation, etc.), public safety
(police and fire headquarters) and a county court building are located in my
city. They are all on one landscaped area with buildings scattered
While I'd probably colloquially call it a dirt road, your description of the
construction sounds suspiciously like the construction developed by John
MacAdam and may well be considered to be surfaced road by a highway engineer.
In the early days of motoring that type of road was considered to
It seems to me that landuse=events is reasonable. Most of the places called
fairgrounds where I am are used for other events other than the traditional
once a year fair. There are often swap meets, animal shows, concerts, and other
events held during the year. And the area often (always in my
I wonder if there might be some regional variation in the US: I've always
thought of them as fire hydrants rather than fire plugs.
Looks like fire plug might be an older term and technology maybe coming out of
England based on the introductory paragraph at
Interesting. . . I've only skied in the US and Canada and mostly in the western
US. Most if not all the alpine/downhill ski areas I've been to have very
definitely marked boundaries. There are backcountry and cross country/nordic
skiing areas I've been to where the boundaries are vague and
For what it is worth, in the area I live in such facilities seem to be called
corporate yards.
Since industrial=depot seems to have only one use at present and does not fit
exactly. At least it does not fit in my mind. Perhaps it could be tagged as
landuse=industrial, industrial=corporate_yard
Some very good points here. . .
On Feb 9, 2014, at 10:47 AM, André Pirard wrote:
Hi,
I left this unsent for some time, so it may duplicate what has already been
said.
But it's uttermost important.
snip
There doesn't seem to be routing quality assurance tools, not even Osmose
Why we have aerialway=platter or T-bars? Maybe the same reason we have
building=house, building=residential, building=garage, building=industrial,
etc. when we could just tag them all building=yes. They are different forms of
a drag lift and the difference has significance to many people.
If
On Jan 23, 2014, at 12:35 PM, yvecai wrote:
I've checked the 8 piste:type=ski_jump mapped and a part one that is obscured
by cloud, the others are what they are: the piste on the on the ski jump
facility (I even forgot I mapped some myself from Bing). I was afraid this
tag would be already
As an American, I hadn't heard of a platter lift either. One area I used to ski
it had a Poma lift which apparently meets the description. Perhaps whoever
chose platter lift wished to avoid a trade name.
As mentioned on another response, there are significant differences to the
skiers/riders
In the areas I cross country ski at in the California mountains many trails are
used by both nordic skiers and snowshoers. Since I am ski centric I've tended
to tag them as piste:type=nordic. Could one simply tag them as
piste:type=nordic;snowshoe? A bit ugly and the difficulty is an issue as
A single trail, even a single section of a trail, represented by a single way
could have one difficulty rating for a person on snowshoes and a different
difficulty rating for a person on skis.
-Tod
On Jan 9, 2014, at 11:08 AM, yvecai wrote:
On 01/09/2014 07:27 PM, Tod Fitch wrote:
I
activity type.
-Tod
On Jan 9, 2014, at 12:55 PM, fly wrote:
Do not really understand your problem.
As already mentioned you can use a semicolon for the piste_type values
and tag the difficulty with addidtional keys like difficulty:sled=*
cu fly
On 09.01.2014 21:44, Tod Fitch wrote
On Dec 10, 2013, at 3:03 AM, Andrew Errington wrote:
Yes please! I just added some hiking trails and had a named spur[1] that I
wanted to record. I used place=locality, but it seems wrong for the same
reasons you give. I'd suggest that since we have natural=peak, and
natural=saddle we
It has been a while since I worked in a facility with such a building. But I
recall it being called a guard shack or guard house. Taginfo has only one
guard_shack (and one guard_booth) but does have 100 guardhouse entries. The few
building=guardhouse entries that I looked at via bing imagery do
On Nov 29, 2013, at 7:07 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2013/11/17 The definition given for the landuse-polygon seems too
restrictive, I'd
ditch the second part are constructed up to a boundary or barrier
separating this land from private
A fifth method might be to use forward and backward tags on the node where the
sign is tagged much like one of the suggested methods for tagging traffic
signals.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Traffic_signal#Tag_all_incoming_ways
Seems like one uniform way of tagging traffic control signs
05.11.2013 00:16, schrieb Tod Fitch:
A fifth method might be to use forward and backward tags on the node
where the sign is tagged much like one of the suggested methods for
tagging traffic signals.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Traffic_signal#Tag_all_incoming_ways
Seems like one uniform way
As an American English speaker, monitoring station seems better than
measurement station.
Tod
--
Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse my brevity.
malenki o...@malenki.ch wrote:
At the moment there exist:
man_made=measurement_station
man_made=monitoring_station
Both for mapping the same
Would bicycle:dismount be better than bicycle_dismount? Seems like that would
be more in keeping with current key naming conventions.
Tod
--
Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse my brevity.
Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
I think dismount should be a key, not a value -
I don't see the use of multipolygon relations in this manor in the wiki. Nor
have I noticed it in use in the areas that I have edited. Nor do I recall
answers suggesting using multiple multipoloygons on the help site.
Is this a common technique that I have somehow missed?
Thanks!
Tod
--
Sent
Looking at the page, and specifically at the images of AED devices in various
locations, reminded me: In the US the instructions given to the lay person by
the AED are in spoken English. I assume those in other countries will give
verbal instructions in the local language. Should there be a
On Sep 13, 2013, at 12:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Il giorno 13/set/2013, alle ore 04:49, Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com ha
scritto:
I can think of a number of areas in the US west that would count as
mountains by that definition if approached from one direction
Sounds like a definition set by politicians. :)
I can think of a number of areas in the US west that would count as mountains
by that definition if approached from one direction but not the other. Mogollon
Rim for one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mogollon_Rim
-Tod
On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:49
On Wed, September 11, 2013 10:17 am, Christoph Hormann wrote:
On Wednesday 11 September 2013, Tod Fitch wrote:
Drought winter in one area of interest:
http://kirnim.smugmug.com/2013Adventures-2/Mt-Pinos-Feb-2013/i-cJXHsL
S/0/M/P1110823-M.jpg
Summer in another area:
http://www.nordicbase.org
must be sufficient, don't you think
?
Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com a écrit :
I'd like to start adding some vegetation information to an area
in the mountains of Southern California. There are a couple of
situations that I am uncertain of the correct tagging
On Tue, September 10, 2013 2:37 pm, Christoph Hormann wrote:
[...]
The real problem about natural=tundra is that it is a very broad
classification. Essentially it starts at the treeline with often quite
lush grass or woody vegetation and ends with scattered lichens. In a
way natural=tundra
Thank you for the suggestion. Turns out that the operation at Kennedy Meadows
is quite a bit bigger with restaurant, lodging, store, etc. That is up the
highway from the one I'm tagging but I'm following your suggestion minus the
animal_boarding, feeding, etc. as it appears from the operator's
Hi,
Interesting. Sounds like the equivalent of a hostel or mountain hut used by
hikers or skiers but for equistrians.
I don't know much about horses or the facilities for them. I know there are
several buildings at the place I want to map one of which has been called a
bunk house and another
ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pack_station
I assume it should be tourism=something but what the something is is not
obvious.
Nothing shows in the wiki or taginfo that I can see or outfitter or
pack_station, etc.
From Wikipedia, it seems this might be a regional name but the hints on
what
On Tue, August 20, 2013 11:41 am, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
I have marked for voting:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:amenity%3Dranger_station
Alert: that the proposal includes semi-mechanically re-tagging,
particularly of the imported USA National Park Service data.
On Aug 19, 2013, at 6:24 AM, Craig Wallace wrote:
Sounds like you mean the shoulder. See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shoulder
It should usually be tagged as an attribute on the highway, not mapped as a
separate way or area.
Craig
+1
Except that I think in the UK they might
On Mon, August 19, 2013 11:11 am, yve...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a generic term that could include shoulder and verge, 'road-side'
maybe ?
In the US it would be shoulder for both:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/publications/flexibility/ch06.cfm
Maybe shoulder=*
Where * is one of
that
piste:oneway=yes might fit. :)
-Tod
On Jul 23, 2013, at 6:22 AM, fly wrote:
Am 23.07.2013 01:42, schrieb Tod Fitch:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ski#Other_Features gives a piste:one
way tag which seems like it should fit the bill.
oneway:ski=yes/-1 would fit, too but you seem to talk about
201 - 300 of 304 matches
Mail list logo
