Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tag:traffic_calming=hillocky

2020-12-20 Thread Yves via Tagging
Maybe it's time to create a sub-category of traffic_calming=bump with another tag for the peace of mind of data consumer and not bridle too much (though I think it is not possible) the creativity of traffic calming features creators? Yves Le 20 décembre 2020 11:42:56 GMT+01:00, "Tomáš Hurýn"

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tag:traffic_calming=hillocky

2020-12-19 Thread Yves via Tagging
I don't think they can be categorized with the ones designed to make noise. It looks like they are intended to work as bumps, but cheaper and easier to install. Yves Le 19 décembre 2020 23:47:29 GMT+01:00, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit : >On 20/12/20 9:24 am, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote:

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards

2020-12-05 Thread Yves via Tagging
Le 5 décembre 2020 19:19:31 GMT+01:00, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > >you guys are finding real world examples for every weird situation that nobody >expected to even exist. Traffic lights for rock fall somewhere? > >Cheers Martin They are no so rare, I remember one going down from La

Re: [Tagging] Animal trails

2020-11-30 Thread Yves via Tagging
Creating a new tag for this is not a bad idea. Yves Le 30 novembre 2020 21:27:33 GMT+01:00, Seth Deegan a écrit : >You could add a `note=*` to every element. You should probably contact the >mappers of that region and explain to them not to add them. > >I agree that in this case, mapping

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards

2020-11-26 Thread Yves via Tagging
And hazards for niche practices (climbing, whitewater sports, ski touring,...) that are actually mapped in OSM are not generally signposted or 'official'. Maybe we can't expect this proposal to cover them, but you can't prevent users to use the tag hazard to map them. Yves Le 26 novembre 2020

Re: [Tagging] Elevated housing estate

2020-11-25 Thread Yves via Tagging
I guess the level won't be completely sealed and may serve for something once the building is inhabited. Wait and them! Yves Le 25 novembre 2020 02:26:22 GMT+01:00, Graeme Fitzpatrick a écrit : >On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 11:20, Joseph Eisenberg >wrote: > >> Is the whole ground level a parking

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Pumping proposal

2020-11-22 Thread Yves via Tagging
Given the number exposed here by Martin, and the fact that there is a few established data consumers, I think that preserving the pump tag as it is now and refine it with another tag would be a good idea indeed. Yves Le 22 novembre 2020 02:58:07 GMT+01:00, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > >

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Cycle Route Relations vs. Ways

2020-11-16 Thread Yves via Tagging
On the history of elements, this tool is particularly good I think : https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/ Yves ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Deprecate water=pond?

2020-11-11 Thread Yves via Tagging
We should get rid of all tags too close to natural language. I propose a unified tagging scheme: material = dihydrogen monoxyde formula = H2O flowing = yes/no depth = xx Wait, in fact this could be extended to anything from building to trees!! Yves Le 10 novembre 2020 06:26:39 GMT+01:00, Joseph

Re: [Tagging] Basic cartography features missing, why?

2020-11-09 Thread Yves via Tagging
Le 9 novembre 2020 10:08:42 GMT+01:00, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : >Am Mo., 9. Nov. 2020 um 09:37 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < >tagging@openstreetmap.org>: > >> In short: technically CC0 may be used, but it would be confusing as ODBL >> would still >> apply anyway. >> >> See

Re: [Tagging] Basic cartography features missing, why?

2020-11-08 Thread Yves via Tagging
Maybe I'm wrong, but can I use OSM tiles to help tracing a 'Blue Valley' polygon, simplify or copy a multipolygon 'Martin' s wood' or whatever and declare it cc0? Yves Le 8 novembre 2020 11:08:57 GMT+01:00, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > > >sent from a phone > >> On 8. Nov 2020, at 10:08,

Re: [Tagging] Basic cartography features missing, why?

2020-11-08 Thread Yves via Tagging
Good initiative Martin, at first sight I'll make two comments : * CC0 doesn't allow to derive data from OSM * as geometries are fuzzy in nature, there should be a way to accept several geometries for a same entity, be it only to avoid long discussions on boundaries Yves Le 8 novembre 2020

Re: [Tagging] Basic cartography features missing, why?

2020-11-07 Thread Yves via Tagging
Le 7 novembre 2020 12:47:45 GMT+01:00, Tomas Straupis a écrit : > Fuzzy features (like >continents, mountain ranges, bays etc. should probably be moved to a >separate database). > I often thought an 'Openlabelmap' database containing geometries to help with the labeling of such features could

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Artificial

2020-10-21 Thread Yves via Tagging
"Phase 4: All man_made tags to be removed 2031-01-01 00:00 UTC+0" I think that is as reasonable as it could be. Yves Le 21 octobre 2020 04:46:34 GMT+02:00, Robert Delmenico a écrit : >*Link to proposal page:* >https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/artificial >*Definition*: A