Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] destination:street

With destination:x you mark in a easy way the correspondence with other tags.Destination:2 goes with distance:2 and with destination:symbol:2 for example. It is an easy way to see the correspondence. For people like me (we have less idea to program something like a preset or a style in JOSM, for

Re: [Tagging] Exit list signs?

I think Traffic sign is a NODE, IN the way, as I map stop,give way,or city limit. But putting a traffic sign does not free you of putting tags and values in segments of a way as maxspeed (I map the traffic sign as a node but I repeat the maxspeed=value in the segment). A good solution for making

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] destination:street

Other solution destination=Main Street destination:2=7th Avenue destination:3=Downtown Mappersville destination:4=Karte County Courthouse ... and so on. (for legible reasons a "standard" traffic sign does not show more than 3/4 items by direction at sign). also this will be "portable" to other

Re: [Tagging] Exit list signs?

You can use traffic_sign:forward (or backward) if it is correct=US:(get the code in the MUTCD) and then apply all the other tags and values of exit_to scheme. Also you can put the codes via Traffic Signs US JOSM preset. In a future the preset will help you to add the other tags and values as It

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] destination:street

Little apreciation: Please, no multiple values,no semicolon.Better subtags yopaseopor ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - flight route

For me it is not a bad idea. OpenStreetmap has to start to think in a "global map" as is a geographic database, so flights or ferries has to be inside in. But what about people who did not interest it? And what about tagging fire_hydrants? who cares about? or "love hotels"? who cares about? All

Re: [Tagging] Pedibus / Walking bus routes

I think the key is...is it official? Is it a timetable? Is it a place you can sign it? If is not an official thing, and it is discretional to some parents (one day yes, one day no, we don't accept such kids...) , to some schools...I think OSM is not the place. But if that has the support of

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Bar vs Pub vs Restaurant in the US?

In Spain is worse: meanings of these two words (pub and bar) are exchanged each other. What can we do? yopaseopor ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] lit=yes, but with luminous discs built into the path

I think you can propose/use/invent some new lit=* tag, could you? yopaseopor salut i taggin On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Dave F wrote: > Hi > > I've a path that's lit with luminous discs built into its surface: > > http://tinyurl.com/hucxeoa > > I'll use

Re: [Tagging] Help required on tagging a "wadi"

Be careful. Imagine the wadi or intermittent stream floods suddenly. If you know that you can think with two ways (track and stream) you can use the track...but the reality may be different and can be flooded by the "intermittent water".To avoid this I would tag in the same line ,also I would add

Re: [Tagging] Roads with no speed limits

I think you can put the information if you know it. The only developed country with no limits in some pieces of their ways is Germany, and the other pieces have the traffic signs (remember now you can put it also in OSM with ISO two-letter country). In England in some pieces of road there's no

Re: [Tagging] Roads with no speed limits

maxspeed=implicit isn't ? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source:maxspeed http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:source:maxspeed%3Dimplicit yopaseopor ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

> if you add the way for the forth lane at the point where it starts (as > opposed to the point where you latestly could change) you will get less > optimal routing suggestions in the case the route is calculated from after > the start of this lane (because your navigator will think you can't

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

I don't know for 4th lane so short if it's better to mantain three lanes and then "create a way with one lane" to join or to exit the motorway. It's clear and the driver or the data will be there to decide which lane is better for him, I think it is not a problem making the change of lane by the

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

For me the image is clear, the lane marks on the 4th right lane are shorter than the other marks. Also the upper traffic signs marks you two closer exits, this is the reason the big traffic signs explain you all the possibilities. If you go little bit to the next two pics you see the directions

Re: [Tagging] Question on exit-entrance rendering.

Instead of this "messy map"... I don't think it is so difficult. It is hard because of all the amount of information you need to describe correctly but it is "easy". OSM can work with a 3D system, with in layers. Also you have the incline tag,ele, exit_to, ref, ref:colour, destination: ,

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

If you know which turn:lane it is you can specify it instead there's no marks. In Spain, with administrations in crisis some of them don't paint all the lanes (before the crisis they painted all the lanes). So I think we can explain the destination...if we know it, and if we want to do it (put

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

I think you can specify the information you know instead this information is not explicit written on the road. So for me , in my opinion it is better specify through or whatever will be the direction that none or |" " (blank) or something like that. yopaseopor

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

I think it is so clear. Instead of no painting marks with an arrow, you have some vertical signs and also no_change lane marks, so for me it is clear how it works. With all traffic signs, posted I think the junction will have all the information software needs to process it. Also I think it is tru

<    1   2