Re: [Tagging] Test prep centres and cram schools as amenity=prep_school?

Hello. Tagging schemes for cram schools and tutorial centers have been discussed very often, but none of the discussion got to the solid conclusion. I am strongly concerned about the situation, and requested for comments on my diary. ML:

Re: [Tagging] New way to use tagging: simple questions with no prep_discussion: tag for a IT School ?

Hello, yo and Paul. 2019年6月9日(日) 8:16 Paul Allen : > On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 at 23:46, yo paseopor wrote: > >> >> Whats is the tag for a IT school like this? >> http://www.mecabit.com/ >> > > If it's an educational facility then it looks like amenity=college. If > it's more of a "get people into >

Re: [Tagging] A simple survey and proposal about tagging cram schools

2019年5月23日(木) 4:22 Jmapb : > > Hi! Just in case you missed it, we had brief and inconclusive > discussions of these earlier this year: > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-January/042561.html > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-February/042983.html >

[Tagging] A simple survey and proposal about tagging cram schools

Hello. I have wanted to organize tagging schemes of educational institutions outside school. I conducted a very simple survey and uploaded the result and my opinion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/yumean1119/diary/364867 . I would be glad if you give me any comments. Takayuki Ishino

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Top_up (fifth revision)

Hello. 2019年5月11日(土) 5:30 bkil : > I've read in the previous rejection comments that many opposed to > putting brand details in keys. What do you think about this version: > prepaid_top_up:mobile=yes/. The reason is that around here, > you could top up your mobile phone either at the given

Re: [Tagging] Japan road tagging (Was "what todo if the status of a propal isn't set to Voting")

Hello. 2019年5月9日(木) 7:57 Graeme Fitzpatrick : > On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 06:15, marc marc wrote: > >> Some use the status to check propal with the status=Voting >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Proposals_with_%22Voting%22_status > > > When I had a look at that page, I noticed >

Re: [Tagging] Why should we avoid overusage of amenity=* tag?

Thank you for the reply. > These difficulties, and opposing ideas on how to deal with existing tags, make it hard to change established tagging schemes. But I am strongly in favour of not establishing new amenity=* for hitherto unmapped facilites, but rather use new tags altogether, whose use can

Re: [Tagging] Why should we avoid overusage of amenity=* tag?

Thank you for the speedy reply! 2019年4月21日(日) 9:13 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > On 21/04/19 05:31, Paul Allen wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Apr 2019 at 19:52, 石野貴之 wrote: > >> >> I don't know the reason why we should not use amenity=* too much. If you >> have

[Tagging] Why should we avoid overusage of amenity=* tag?

Hello. I am yumean1119 from Japan and mapping mainly around Okayama. Recently, I have surfed some proposal pages about new tagging schems for educational facilities. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Education_2.0