retaining wall  is applicable to whatever area
Il dom 8 nov 2020, 06:50 Joseph Eisenberg ha
> Is there a specific tag or method for mapping terraced farmland?
What is "camera:angle"?
Taginfo  lists values consistent both to field-of-view and
inclination. I cannot find wiki, just discussion and a proposal status
Il giorno sab 28 mar 2020 alle ore 19:19 Richard Fairhurst <
rich...@systemed.net> ha scritto:
> Hello folks,
> Route relation names aren’t in a great state, are they?
> The upshot: bad luck if you want to render the actual names of routes on
a map. You can’t.
Well, if somebody takes care of
I've an OSM compatible dataset that helps me to spot landfills. Older
ones are already covered by grass and/or trees.
IMHO could be useful to save landfill locations for a future possible use.
Does it make sense tag the ones with surface alterations with level=-1 ?
Or shall I consider
Il giorno mer 5 feb 2020 alle ore 23:07 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> And amenity=drinking_water may be combined with them (except of unfortunate
> case of fountain).
Since fountain is intended as "sculptural and/or decorational", IMHO
amenity=fountain is not consistent. AFAIK
So "active" is ment in geological time... rather wide for OSM :-)
How to tag its recent activity, ie for touristic purposes?
Il ven 24 gen 2020, 14:40 Christoph Hormann ha scritto:
> On Friday 24 January 2020, Cascafico Giovanni wrote:
> > Which is the
this query  is supposed to display active volcanes. I made some
research using Sentinel-2 browser, but it happens that most volcanoes
doesn't have an infrared response .
Which is the criteria to tag volcanoes as volcano:status=active?
Il mer 18 dic 2019, 16:48 Tom Pfeifer ha scritto:
> The 'box' would contain a full access point and not just the antenna, thus
> I'd prefer not to tag the
> antenna alone.
So how to tag the whole hardware? Shall I refer
which tags for those boxes, usually on pole or wall mounted which
provide free public WLAN access? In my area they are managed by
municipality and are subject to registration.
My tagging would be:
operator=Comune di Cividale del Friuli
in Italy there are several small processing companies catalogued as
artisans, mostly in categories like food processing (meat, biscuits,
milk, etc), which don't run a shop (or shop is a minor business).
Reading the wikis, I understand that, depending on business volumes, I
if your project aims to track deforestation in a timespan, IMHO you had
better to focus on trees only. Trying to guess which landuse is going to
replace trees is hard.
I'd start from an AOI entirely mapped with forest, wood or, in doubt, the
generic landcover=trees all of which derived
> Il giorno mer 13 mar 2019 alle ore 12:16 Tom Pfeifer <
t.pfei...@computer.org> ha scritto:
> I think you misunderstand. OSM is based on locally sourced, handcrafted
data. That creates the high quality
Have youi ever seen hot tasks results? Huge building polys, mixed
> Il giorno lun 11 mar 2019 alle ore 14:11 Mateusz Konieczny <
> matkoni...@tutanota.com> ha scritto:
> > Fixed in
I took a 600+ dataset, geocoded them, manually conflate 53 of them, put
source references on umap, put
Il giorno lun 11 mar 2019 alle ore 12:20 Cascafico Giovanni <
cascaf...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > You were criticized for stretching the opening_hours syntax to describe
> seasonal operations ("Jan 01
> > - Dec 31"), but did not respond nor adjust your tagging.
Il giorno sab 9 mar 2019 alle ore 22:15 Tom Pfeifer
> I have severe problems with your process. First, yes it is an import. You
called it an import
> yourself ("manually importing") here, and on the Italien list where you
first asked about the
> Where did you see a "100
Il sab 9 mar 2019, 12:18 Cascafico Giovanni ha
> In short (I'm on phone)...
> Please find here  umap used for manual conflation. For source data and
> license, follow footer info link.
> AFAIK <10
In short (I'm on phone)...
Please find here  umap used for manual conflation. For source data and
license, follow footer info link.
AFAIK <100 nodes don't fall in import category.
Il sab 9 mar 2019, 11:46 Tom Pfeifer ha scritto:
> On 09.03.2019 10:10, Cascafico Giovanni wrote:
Well, hotels dataset I'm manually importing has a boolean baby-sitting
field (as for "pets" in other ML thread).
I think that a generic info is better than no info, particularly if hotel
features childcare=yes and whatever contact tag.
Il ven 8 mar 2019, 20:45 Martin Koppenhoefer ha
How can I tag an hotel which features baby-sitting?
Tagging mailing list
Unfortunately dataset I'm manually importing has a boolean "pets" field.
I guess if go for "dogs" it will be 9/10 right, while a generic "pets"
99/100 (considering the alligator anomaly :-) The latter has less taginfo
popularity, but better fits source data.
Il gio 7 mar 2019, 14:09 seirra blake
how can I tag and hotel (or whatever) that allows pets? Besides, semi-OT,
if hotel offers babysitting, is childcare=yes ok?
I briefly googled in OSM wiki and couldn't find. If already answered,
please forgive me.
Tagging mailing list
In source dataset there is no field for accuracy. I'd go for the simplest
note="height is estimated, please improve"
Tagging mailing list
I'm going to import a small dataset of trees. Some tree heights are defined
as "measured", some as "estimated".
About estimated values, I've found a wiki definition only for width :
derive an est_height tag,
go for most popular taginfo solutions,
simply assign an estimated value to
2018-08-26 2:17 GMT+02:00 Graeme Fitzpatrick :
> On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 at 19:27, Cascafico Giovanni
>> Got it.
>> +5k nodes imported without brand key
> Great! :-)
my mistake... a previous version of .
+5k nodes imported without brand key
Il 25 ago 2018 12:16 AM, "Graeme Fitzpatrick" ha
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 at 18:29, Martin Koppenhoefer
>> > On 24. Aug 2018, at 09:57, Cascafico Giovanni
The issue is: do we really want to drop unfranchising information?
nobrand=yes tag seems reasonable: how can it damage the quality of import?
Tagging mailing list
> “pompe bianche” is a meta category you will not find on the ground in
this part either, rather there will be signs with brands you never heard
> I would leave brands that are already there, and would not tag
nobrand=yes because there is some kind of brand.I'm quoting to brand
I'm going to upload 20k amenity=fuel in Italy; 5k of them are "Pompe
Bianche", which means their don't belong to any brand.
Which solution fits best?
1) brand=Pompe Bianche
3) brand:it=Pompe Bianche
Mail list logo