On 16/09/2010, at 6:57 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
It does seem, however, that it would seem to make more sense to either have
separate nodes for each of the possible directions, or have some other way of
signifying which direction or directions the stop sign applies to.
There's five or ten
On 17/08/2010, at 2:09 AM, Matthias Meißer wrote:
Yes soft moderation by the community but therefore the community needs some
central space and some guidelines. You already see the lack of voters, just
cause it's to decentral communication atm.
It's also because some people (myself included)
On 31/07/2010, at 11:07 AM, John Smith wrote:
Maybe we should stop using words for key pair values and just come up
with a database that issues ID numbers, half the problems with the
current scheme is due to people treating enumerated key pairs in the
same way they are used to using english,
On 28/07/2010, at 1:13 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I think that there is definitely space for a bridge-relation to deal with all
these informations and bring them together. An alternative might be to
draw an (additional) polygon for the bridge area in projection (with
common nodes on the
On 11/12/2009, at 5:44 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
The current wiki definition of highway=cycleway is mainly or
exclusively for bicycles. This I cannot be sure of from the aerial
imagery, nor can I of anything to do with the law. What to do...
Ah, the curse of NearMap being too good.
The current
On 09/12/2009, at 3:30 AM, Mike Harris wrote:
Personally - and I'm probably wrong! - I had always thought that foot /
bicycle = yes / no etc. did not say anything one way or the other about
formal legal status (hence leaving this to designation= ) but merely whether
the evidence on the
On 06/12/2009, at 5:17 PM, John Smith wrote:
2009/12/6 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
I'd hope that bicycle=no would have the same implications for having a
bicycle without riding it as other *=no tags would for their transports. For
example I would guess that where horse=no is used, you
Hi all,
Because we were having *so* much fun repeating the footway-cycleway-path debate
again, here's another related question: what does bicycle=no actually mean, no
bicycles or no cycling?
Last night I asked on IRC whether anyone know how to tag a Cyclists must
dismount sign, and would
