On 12/19/2020 5:16 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I agree with this, there’s a lot of abuse for “pitch”, and these are
not arguments for continuing the line, it’s never too late to learn
from past errors ;-)
leisure=shooting_range might make sense? There are also 4000
military=range (is this
On 12/14/2020 3:11 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
I'd expect a motel to be set up to handle very short duration (one or two
day) at very short notice (turn up and ask for a room) and to offer
meals unless there are diners/restaurants nearby...
Take a look at https://www.canllefaes.com/
I've been using tourism=motel for these, if there are no other features
that would tip them into leisure=resort.
At least In the rural USA, there's a continuum between motels that have
an array of rentable rooms in one or two buildings and those where each
room is an individual cabin, or
On 12/9/2020 9:36 AM, Michael Tsang wrote:
Des Voeux Road Central is considered one of the most important roads
in the area which I
tagged it as highway=secondary, however another editor has repeatedly
changed
it to highway=service on the fact that that road is closed to motor
vehicles
except
On 10/13/2020 6:30 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020, 17:41 Volker Schmidt mailto:vosc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I changed the crossing to the way we do it in many parts of
Europe, i.e. a crossing node _and_ a crossing way. This was
described as an option on the
On 9/4/2020 6:24 PM, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
Sep 4, 2020, 18:19 by tagging@openstreetmap.org:
node and discovered the shelter_type=rock_shelter subtag, but the
map in
question didn't render it any differently. Revisiting the site in fair
weather, I found a tiny
On 9/4/2020 3:45 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
A surveillance cam isn't a "contact" and contact:* is STILL a stupid
idea.
Oh, and what's wrong with url=*? Especially as the wiki page endorses it.
Nb, the link to the "Surveillance under Surveillance" project that you
quoted doesn't mention the url=*
On 9/4/2020 2:10 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am Fr., 4. Sept. 2020 um 19:03 Uhr schrieb Jmapb via Tagging
mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org>>:
On 9/4/2020 11:34 AM, Jmapb via Tagging wrote:
> The "See also" section of that page seems to suggest the
und
On 9/4/2020 11:34 AM, Jmapb via Tagging wrote:
The "See also" section of that page seems to suggest the undocumented
tag `contact:webcam` for this purpose.
(Mea culpa, contact:webcam is indeed documented on the contact page.)
___
Taggi
On 9/3/2020 11:51 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I've created a proposal to formalise shelter_type=rock_shelter, while
currently in-use, there is disagreement within the community on if
this tag should be used and features are commonly mis-tagged.
So I'm hoping with this proposal and voting we can
On 9/4/2020 11:08 AM, dktue wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to tag the link to the (current) JPEG-image of a webcam, but
the wiki doesn't state how to do so [1].
Any suggestions how to tag this?
Cheers,
dktue
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance
The "See also" section of
On 8/3/2020 4:36 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020, 15:29 Jmapb mailto:jm...@gmx.com>> wrote:
...Regardless, if this general approach is considered valid and
workable, then I'd like to propose the following answer to my original
question:
* Q) How
On 8/3/2020 6:07 AM, Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
There is some fuzzy matching, you can expect to work, for example
abbreviations like street -> st or even New York -> NY. But going from
ref=NY-214 to 'State Highway 214' is already a long stretch that requires
special local knowledge.
Understood.
On 8/1/2020 8:40 PM, David Dean wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm interested in proposing and/or documenting existing tagging
approaches of the wiki to ensure that all highway=service ways can
have a service=? associated tag.
Hi David -- My feeling is that often highway=service, without a
service=*
On 8/1/2020 12:51 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
Similarly, if you ask someone the name of the road in California with
ref="CA 96",
they will tell you "Highway 96" or perhaps "The river road". They
won't say
"Nah, it doesn't have a name, just a State highway number."
So in that situation, how
On 7/31/2020 4:24 PM, Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
Put one of the variants into addr:street and then all the variants
as alternative names onto the road. Obviously that stretch of road
is referred to under all these names, so this is what we should map.
Putting aside the question of *which* variant
On 7/31/2020 1:00 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
I'd go with the official address. It's not rare to find addresses in
the US where what goes on an envelope doesn't match what the street is
actually called. Nor is it rare to find the wiki to be wrong
Sometimes the official address is unclear.
Hi all, what's the best way to tag the addr:street of an address along a
highway route?
Example, I'm mapping houses and POIs along NY 212:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/411064
Some segments of the route are tagged name=Main Street and the addresses
there use Main Street for their
Hi Tobias, I've been giving this some thought. My conclusion is that
user validation of tags shouldn't be stored in the same database table
as the tags themselves. It's clear that as the map data ages, tag
validation is going to be a task with parallel and equal importance to
tagging itself, but
On 7/24/2020 7:12 PM, Cj Malone wrote:
OSM does not store edit timestamps for individual tags, only for the
object as a whole. Finding out when a tag was changed requires a
review of the entire history. I had to do this once when I saw a
clear highway=motorway_link tagged as highway=motorway,
On 7/22/2020 12:05 PM, bkil wrote:
My guess is that the adoption of a dismounted_bicycle=* tag or similar
would require significantly *less* work than re-examining all current
bicycle=no ways.
Yes, I think that would be workable.
Nonetheless, I completely agree with you, =no
On 7/22/2020 11:34 AM, Tod Fitch wrote:
On Jul 22, 2020, at 8:09 AM, Jmapb mailto:jm...@gmx.com>> wrote:
If this unfortunate tagging practice really needs to be preserved (the
idea of retagging so many bicycle=no ways is certainly daunting) then
I'd suggest a new key, dismounted_b
On 7/22/2020 11:27 AM, bkil wrote:
According to OSM wiki history, `bicycle=dismount` is a pretty recent
tag, perhaps less than 7 years old. I think `bicycle=no` was invented
much earlier. Hence it is you who wants to redefine a well established tag.
According to the first version of access=* in
On 7/22/2020 10:34 AM, Allroads wrote:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Waterloopbos._Natuurgebied_van_Natuurmonumenten._Informatiebord.jpg
- Fietsers op verharde fietspaden en wegen
-Bicyclist on paved cycleway and roads.
Here is written what is allowed.
But more important:
Overigens
On 7/21/2020 11:02 AM, Jan Michel wrote:
Hi Michal,
I would stay with information=guidepost for those.
They serve exactly the same purpose, so they should get the same major
tag. It's only the way the sign is made that is different. You can add
the common tags like "support", "material",
On 7/16/2020 1:17 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
I'm wondering what, if anything, I should do with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351516889. It doesn't seem to meet
the definition of a highway=residential, but I'm not convinced it is a
lowly highway=service, either, but I also can't easily
wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2020, 17:44 Jmapb mailto:jm...@gmx.com>> wrote:
Regarding the original question -- in what circumstances
are single-member walking/hiking/biking route relations
a good mapping practice -- what would be your answer?
Always
On 5/14/2020 10:01 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 5:48 AM Steve Doerr mailto:doerr.step...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 14/05/2020 09:31, Jo wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2020, 17:44 Jmapb mailto:jm...@gmx.com>> wrote:
Regarding the original questio
On 5/13/2020 10:12 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
We've had relations for over a decade now, IIRC. It's time to stop
treating this basic primitive as entity-non-grata. If tools
/still/ can't deal with this, this is on the tools and their
developers now.
Sure. Regarding the original question -- in
On 5/12/2020 10:58 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:37 PM brad mailto:bradha...@fastmail.com>> wrote:
OK, but it seems redundant to me. A trail/path get tagged as a
path.
There's a trailhead and a sign, it gets a tagged with a name.
Why does
it need to
On 5/1/2020 7:48 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Another idea could be to introduce “running” as a new state of foot, e.g.
foot=no
foot:conditional =yes @ running
I like this, a little less cheeky than conjuring an arbitrary unsigned
minspeed for runners. And would be likely interpreted
On 5/1/2020 4:37 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
Hello,
We have a trail [0] around here where walking/hiking is not allowed,
but running is. Currently it is tagged foot=yes, which doesn't give
the full story. In case you are wondering how such a situation could
come about, it is because the land
On 4/16/2020 4:46 AM, Paul Allen wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 04:08, Andrew Harvey mailto:andrew.harv...@gmail.com>> wrote:
To sidestep your question, oneway=yes on a highway=footway,
cycleway or path already implies it's not accessible to vehicles
so a oneway tag on any of those
On 4/2/2020 9:29 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 3:10 AM Andrew Harvey mailto:andrew.harv...@gmail.com>> wrote:
My view based on current usage, reading of the wiki and general
opinion is that highway=cycleway is meant for any path that is
either designed/intended
On 3/15/2020 6:18 AM, Markus Peloso wrote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/give_box
A small facility where people drop off and pick up various types of
items in the sense of free sharing.
Hi
After "Clarify whatever explicit abstaining is the same as no vote"
and the
On 3/5/2020 9:27 AM, Peter Elderson wrote:
Do you know trails with detached sections? We have some in Nederland,
on the islands. Doesn't fit in the proposed role scheme, I think.
Vr gr Peter Elderson
See this section of the E10 in Czechia (
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5465693 ) --
On 3/2/2020 3:57 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
I'm sure that there'd be a subcategory for 'hiker boxes' as well.
http://www.thetrailmaster.com/hike-smart/hiker-boxes-share-and-share-alike/
https://www.whiteblaze.net/forum/showthread.php/55460-quot-I-found-it-in-a-hiker-box-quot
Major long-distance
On 2/29/2020 3:43 AM, Markus Peloso wrote:
I find amenity=give_box is different from amenity=food_sharing as a
shop=general is different from shop=supermarket.
In Switzerland if I go into a supermarket I found products of daily
hygiene but the main thing is about shopping for food.
True, and
On 2/26/2020 4:32 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
On 26. Feb 2020, at 08:56, Markus Peloso wrote:
The amenity=give_box tag is specific for sharing and reusing none food items.
Please do not use it for food sharing
+1, although these are somehow similar features from a certain point of view,
On 2/26/2020 4:59 PM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
It's also possible to have a functioning petroleum well without any notable
surface-level equipment
So in that case, there would be no "pumping rig", right? There would
just be some pipes and valves the the wellhead, aka a "Christmas
tree":
On 2/26/2020 3:54 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
There are some users on the wiki who seem to treat these two tags as
near-synonyms
man_made=petroleum_well
man_made=pumping_rig
The later was approved, but the first is much more common.
The proposal in 2008 for pumping_rig said
"A tag for
On 2/16/2020 8:21 AM, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 15/02/2020 16:56, Markus Peloso wrote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/in-kind_donation
For a place that takes in-kind donations.
My immediate reaction is that this sounds like a very similar concept
to 'give box', which was
On 2/6/2020 10:47 AM, Paul Allen wrote:
And if they wanted to comment but not vote they'd add their comment to the
talk page instead. Right?
Absolutely! If that's what the instructions said. But they clearly say
that if you do want to comment, but you don't want to vote, then choose
[Sorry for the repost, corrected wiki link below...]
On 2/6/2020 5:40 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Actually, in the past we always have counted every kind of comment
(vote yes / no and abstain) as part of the total, which indeed led to
the situation that an (explicit) abstention effectively
On 2/6/2020 5:40 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Actually, in the past we always have counted every kind of comment
(vote yes / no and abstain) as part of the total, which indeed led to
the situation that an (explicit) abstention effectively counted like a
no-vote.
Are we going to change this
On 2/5/2020 6:21 PM, Lionel Giard wrote:
Site relation are more used to put the tag "amenity=university" and
all the information only 1 time for the whole university when it is
spread across a city or multiple sites. This site relation equal to
the amenity=university area under a campus that's
On 2/5/2020 4:36 AM, Lionel Giard wrote:
Thus, it seems difficult to find "one" subdivision that will always
work worldwide ?! :-) Maybe that we should keep a generic word and
allow everything in it (like subdivision=* with the name of "School",
"Institute", "College",... if relevant) ?
I
On 2/5/2020 8:58 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
Well, if we count all of those, it is 68% (13/19) which is less than
the 74% cut-off.
Is it normal to count abstentions as part of the vote total? The
proposal template text (
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Proposed_feature_voting )
On 2/3/2020 5:55 PM, Warin wrote:
On 30/1/20 9:23 pm, MARLIN LUKE wrote:
Noticed amenity=shelter. I initially thought about combining it with
shelter-type:picnic, but it seems too... "open" for me. Like, not a
complete building.
I'll use this in the meantime
There is
On 1/31/2020 11:56 AM, Jmapb wrote:
They don't have their own street signs, and addresses
along them will be 12345 Route 28 (or 12345 State Route 28, or 12345
State Highway 28, or 12345 NY 28... poorly standardized.) There might be
a case for removing the name= from these, maybe even tagging
On 1/30/2020 6:22 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
Uhm. It looks pretty much like any other `highway=unclassified`. The
signs say 'Old Route 7' in the style the township uses for rural
roads. There are no shields or chaining markers to indicate that it's
a state highway. And it's been called, 'Old Route
On 1/29/2020 6:14 PM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
The healthcare=* tags were formally proposed and voted on 10 years ago.
Included in that proposal (
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?oldid=1318635 ) was the idea
that dual-tagging some features with both amenity=*/healthcare=* would
be the
On 1/29/2020 2:23 PM, Andrew Hain wrote:
Is it time for another controversial decisions page then?
The healthcare=* tags were formally proposed and voted on 10 years ago.
Included in that proposal (
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?oldid=1318635 ) was the idea
that dual-tagging some
On 1/29/2020 8:50 AM, Lionel Giard wrote:
That's clearer when we get all the history thank you Joseph ! :-)
I agree with you that the added value of duplicating the key is very
limited, so i understand your edit on the wiki. ^_^
IMO, unilaterally deprecating
On 1/28/2020 4:49 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
Be that as it may, there are a great many `highway=path` objects
where the intent was `combined foot- and cycleway`. The concept that a
`footway` is urban while a `path` represents something more like a
wilderness trail is a rather new one to me. (I'm
On 1/28/2020 4:23 PM, Tomas Straupis wrote:
Yet for ten years or even more the logic was that if the same way is
designated for both pedestrians and cyclists, it cannot be tagged with
highway=footway - as it is for cyclists as well, it cannot be tagged
with highway=cycleway because it is for
On 1/27/2020 3:53 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
The same user also changed the Australian tagging guidelines without
discussion, which we didn't notice till last October:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-October/013009.html
and they were reverted. Didn't notice at the time
On 1/28/2020 9:23 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
The pages are nearly identical.
Actually, the healthcare=pharmacy page was just made recently by
copying the amenity=pharmacy page. Before it was only documented
minimally at Key:healthcare
I believe the mappers who developed the healthcare=*
On 1/27/2020 12:27 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 16:37 Uhr schrieb Jmapb mailto:jm...@gmx.com>>:
And also editing the
highway=path page, which currently says it's not for use in urban
situations.
this seems very strange and is likely the
Hi all, just noticed this passage on the cycleway=* wiki page (
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway ):
For mapping a separate path (on a separate way) dedicated to cycling
traffic use highway=cycleway. Foot traffic is restricted on these paths.
* Do not use highway=cycleway on
On 1/21/2020 3:42 AM, Markus Peloso wrote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/give_box
A small facility where people drop off and pick up various types of
items in the sense of free sharing.
Hi
Thanks for the discussion, inputs and improvement to this tag.
*I request for
On 1/15/2020 10:26 AM, marc marc wrote:
Le 15.01.20 à 16:15, Jmapb via Tagging a écrit :
Don't forget about man_made=drinking_fountain!
omg, what's the diff with amenity=drinking_water ?
the direction of water flow upwards?
348 out of 371 objects also have an amenity tag, which
shows
On 1/15/2020 12:55 AM, European Water Project wrote:
Would it be appropriate to use the tag "seasonal" for a water fountain
(whether tagged as "amenity=drinking_water" or "amenity = fountain and
drinking_water = yes" )?
Don't forget about man_made=drinking_fountain!
J
On 1/14/2020 9:13 AM, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
Here's how the mappers have seen the tags in question so far,
according to Taginfo:
oneway:foot=no 1267 occurrences (not all from one region)
oneway:foot=yes 89
oneway:foot=-1, 1 occurrence
foot:oneway=no 48
foot:oneway=yes 2
On 1/13/2020 9:43 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 8:21 AM Paul Allen wrote:
Not very intuitive but, perhaps in rare cases, necessary. What if the road is
one-way to both vehicles and pedestrians but vehicles go from A to B whilst
pedestrians go from B to A?
You beat me to it!
On 1/13/2020 9:46 AM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
Personally, I have no problem with oneway=yes having different
implications depending on the value of the highway key. In general I
would expect the oneway value to align the predominant use of the
highway in question.
More
On 1/11/2020 7:13 PM, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 18:18, Jmapb via Tagging
wrote:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97010406
- It was originally a vehicle route but was changed to pedestrian with
painted bike and foot lanes. For motor vehicles, only emergency
On 1/11/2020 11:16 AM, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
I imagine that virtually all real-world pedestrian ways that are
one-way for pedestrians would be on dedicated pedestrian ways - that
is, highway=footway. If that's correct, oneway=yes can be interpreted
as referring to pedestrians on footways (it
On 1/7/2020 7:26 AM, Paul Allen wrote:
And yet the examples you give are shops, or shelves within shops.
They are
NOT boxes. On those grounds alone, "give box" is a very bad name. In
any case,
who is doing the giving to whom?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Give-away_shop uses the generic term
On 1/6/2020 5:41 PM, Markus Peloso wrote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Givebox
A facility where people drop off and pick up various types of goods in
the sense of free sharing.
Hi
Based on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Reuse
On 12/9/2019 3:43 AM, Peter Elderson wrote:
I have walked many "Camino" sections in Italy. The "checkpoints" are
just stamps, you can get them at many shops, hotels, restaurants,
tourist info points and the like on the way. They will stamp anything
for anyone who asks. There is no register,
On 12/8/2019 6:44 PM, Peter Elderson wrote:
Could you envision a node passed by two hikes, and being a checkpoint
for the one and nothing special for the other?
Camino de Santiago ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/153968 )
comes to mind. Hikers doing the whole route carry passports
On 12/7/2019 11:52 AM, s8evq wrote:
On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 10:30:37 +1100, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
For nodes .. think the roles of ways should be done first, but some
thoughts for later proposal/s.
Are they necessary?
In my limited experience mapping hiking routes, I have not yet
On 12/6/2019 1:28 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote:
I think the "forward" and "backward" don't belong in a role of a
relation. Oneway=yes on a way should be enough. In the Wiki discussion
it is said that if there is one little "oneway" way in a big branch,
then all the ways in a branch should be checked
On 12/3/2019 3:26 PM, Sebastian Martin Dicke wrote:
I often found offices of lawyers, which are notaries, too, and office
sharings of lawyers and notaries. To tag this appropriate, I wrote a
proposal:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/notary
Definition: Notary services
On 11/16/2019 12:21 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I have found a shop that sells Volvo and Volkswagen commercial
vehicles (large trucks). Looking in the wiki, it suggested the tag
shop=car should/could also be used for this, but I find it puzzling.
How would someone looking at the map
On 11/7/2019 2:09 PM, Mark Wagner wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:26:14 +
marc marc wrote:
ere possession of a bicycle is forbidden
can you share the a picture of this traffic sign ?
It's a sign for a state natural area rather than a federal wilderness
area, and the situation is a little
On 11/6/2019 3:08 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
bicycle_pushed=no?
bicycle_pushed is more clear for someone encountering it
for the first time - bicycle=total_ban is a bit confusing
Especially as in some places access for bicycles
may be "never" (explicit "no bicycle" signs)
or "only during
On 10/22/2019 10:36 AM, Ilya Zverev wrote:
I understand the reasoning, but I don’t see how can I follow the
“truth on the ground” principle. Are there any guidelines on choosing
the correct tag? For some reason people don’t write its purpose on a
side. And again, images in three of these pages
On 10/17/2019 1:01 AM, John Willis via Tagging wrote:
Also, how do you specify which games are offered? gambling=pachinko is
in the wiki, but what about adult_gaming_centre? is gambling=* the
default way to define what games are offered at such facilities? that
seems to be vague or missing.
On 10/14/2019 6:07 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
There are in some areas pubs that would merit a brand tag (maybe it is
generally common), they have the beer logo aside their name on the
sign, beer mats, menus, glasses , sunshades, everything can be branded
(it could happen they’re “recycling”
On 10/8/2019 6:20 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
I was wondering about the same thing, because you've then also got
Country & Western, German, any & all varieties of Gay ... ?
Bit of an awkward one, but there are pub's in Northern & Inland
Australia that white people are NOT welcome in (& I'm
On 10/8/2019 4:37 PM, Rory McCann wrote:
What's the best way to tag an Irish pub? Not just a pub in Ireland, but
a specifically themed "Irish Pub" (which are usually outside Ireland)?
There's ~300 instances of `cuisine=irish`, which would make total sense
for places which (also) serve food.
On 9/14/2019 10:53 AM, Tim Magee wrote:
I would absolutely agree with this use case. Especially for cases such as the
regularly mentioned Burger King. If somebody from out of town is either
traveling through or armchair mapping they could be confused. If they are
using the ID editor, it suggests
On 8/20/2019 4:57 AM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 20/8/19 6:24 pm, John Willis via Tagging wrote:
So let's standardize on a tag:
amenity=hitching_post
hitching_post=dog ?
Interestingly, one of the items they sell is a green 30x30cm marker
to go on the sidewalk in front of the pole -
On 8/16/2019 10:56 PM, Warin wrote:
I think the key:educational maybe better used later for schools,
colleges, cram schools etc.
The (dormant) proposal for these was
education=school|university|tutor|cram_school etc.
On 8/16/2019 4:59 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
a long route may go through several colour changes but will be signed
with its own marker at principal junctions. (Where I map, there are
only a handful of long-distance routes affected by this: the Long
Path, the Highlands Trail, the Finger Lakes Trail,
On 8/16/2019 2:40 PM, s8evq wrote:
The table with the tagging scheme for the hiking/foot routes is getting there:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_scheme_hiking_walking Just a few
more small things that need to be decided on.
Hi s8evq, nice progress! Just gonna prattle about
On 8/15/2019 10:11 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Anyway, just a property like "service:bicycle:repair=yes" and a name would not
work, IMHO
No indeed, I wouldn't recommend it as a stand-alone feature tag. But as
extra tag to a shop or amenity, it think it would help.
Also note that for
On 8/14/2019 6:45 PM, dcapillae wrote:
Obviusly, «amenity=community_centre»
Sounds correct.
For anything that's not a bicycle shop but still does bicycle repairs
(I've seen cafes, car repair shops, outdoor shops, and even a church
with this service), consider just adding the
On 8/13/2019 4:50 AM, s8evq wrote:
Currently, there are four tagging scheme tables describing how walking (or
hiking) routes should be tagged.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Walking_Routes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking
On 8/13/2019 12:14 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
Alas, we can't do what Google Maps does, and aggregate the private
information of everyone carrying a cell phone to measure current
traffic speeds. That appears to be how Google's router makes its
decisions.
Of course we used to have something along
On 8/4/2019 7:09 PM, dcapillae wrote
I have asked the OSM community in Spain and it seems that some mapper prefer
"building=bullring" instead of "building=stadium". I think the right tag is
"building=stadium" because we use this tag for stadiums, no matter what type
of stadium they are, and a
On 7/31/2019 1:19 PM, dcapillae wrote:
leisure=stadium
sport=bullfighting (in use)
Hi Daniel -- definitely this one: leisure=stadium + sport=bullfighting.
You might also want to use the building=stadium tag, if the stadium
occupies the entire building in question (assuming it's in a building
On 7/7/2019 11:01 PM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
TL:DR I think we can use amenity=test_prep or amenity=cram_school for
most of these.
An alternative from British English would be amenity=tuition, but I
think this might not work in many dialects of English?
--
I did
On 7/5/2019 3:08 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
I read joost's comment as "The operator of this map object is a
specific private citizen"
not as a redefinition of "operator."
Hah, probably. Regardless, I do think that Les Incroyables
Comestibles/Incredible Edibles fits better under the brand key, or
On 7/5/2019 12:18 PM, joost schouppe wrote:
Operator is actually "a specific private citizen"
What's the source of this definition? On the English wiki, operator is
"a company, corporation, person or any other entity who is directly in
charge of the current operation of a map object."
J
On 7/5/2019 10:56 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
I don't think it would be necessary to combine "bbq=no" and
"bring_own_bbq=yes" - if a feature such as a leisure=picnic_site is
tagged "bring_own_bbq=yes" that is sufficient. The tag "bbq=no", like
most tags with value "no", can be omitted.
This is
On 7/4/2019 11:17 PM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
We've also had problems with features tagged "tourism=camp_site" or
"landuse=meadow" plus "barrier=hedge" or "barrier=wall". Is the
barrier supposed to be an area or a linear feature in this case?
I can see the confusion here, but I think this rule
On 7/5/2019 2:16 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
So, what's a better term for a test prep centre, cramp school, or
tutoring office? There the rarely used tag office=tutoring, but that
doesn't quite cover a place like Kaplan or Kumon -
https://au.kumonglobal.com/ - https://www.kaptest.com/
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
