Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

2014-09-19 Thread John Baker
Yeah sadly it is fairly complex to display different icons in different locations. Not something we will doing in OSM carto for a good while. From: jo...@mac.com Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 07:07:56 +0900 To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for

Re: [Tagging] Vending: Cards for Prepaid mobile phone

2014-06-28 Thread John Baker
Are you asking how we topup via ATM? (new tagging for ATM) Retail point Pre-pay point? etc To: tagging@openstreetmap.org From: andi...@t-online.de Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 20:20:35 +0200 Subject: [Tagging] Vending: Cards for Prepaid mobile phone # in a retail store by purchasing a

Re: [Tagging] [OpenStreetMap] #5163: paths and tracks rendering indistinguishable: your opinion?

2014-05-19 Thread John Baker
Rendering issues/discussions are on the github page as stated. Please continue there if needed. But 2 things here. This is looks more similar because a) It is though a forest if the background is lighter it would be less of an issue. b) If Track type is not defined (or =grade3) then it looks

Re: [Tagging] [OpenStreetMap] #5163: paths and tracks rendering indistinguishable: your opinion?

2014-05-19 Thread John Baker
Just to add to address these points. a) the key is static and not relevant to what is on the screen. footpath are in the key but not paths. There are dozens of things in then rendering we cannot add them all. Just the most common. The best solution would be a dynamic key that just displayed

Re: [Tagging] Mismatched Level of Detail in highways vs. other elements

2013-04-07 Thread John Baker
As you are talking about rendering of the roads. I am actually looking at this for the new cartoCSS mapnik style for osm.org. Currently we have several omissions in the mapping for level 18. I think 'all' roads just use the width for the level17 zoom. This is unrealitisic and misleding. I am