[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Deprecating demolished railway tags

This proposal aims to deprecate all Demolished Railway tags. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Deprecating_demolished_railway_tags Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Details of construction

This proposal aims to detail construction projects in OpenStreetMap. Link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Details_of_construction Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Types of highway construction (2)

This proposal will detail the types of highway construction. Please view the proposal on the wiki. Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page. ___ Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] Tagging for the renderer : One-way "flow" bicycle tracks

Am 11.09.2023 um 23:39 schrieb Graeme Fitzpatrick: Not arguing, but oneway:foot = 5024 foot:backward = 394 foot:forward = 300 Personally, I would interpret that as time that the wiki had a rewrite! :-) Voted by their "foot" ... ;-) - and I used it too ... But it is already rewritten: On

[Tagging] Imgur links in OSM data has been backed up

/14415587638029-Imgur-Terms-of-Service-Update-April-19-2023- The Openstreetmap database actually contains about 19712 imgur links. So I've made a script that extracts all Imgur links from the OSM database, using taginfo. And I downloaded all of them tip a zip file. All is available on my Github repo

Re: [Tagging] Deprecate water=pond?

Am 11.11.2020 um 18:25 schrieb Peter Elderson: I am getting a foot vs hiking feeling. Everybody knows a difference, nobody has the same difference. In the end, it does not matter. Hmm - does it matter, if it is a river or a stream or a lake or a pond? Especially a lake with a river flowing

Re: [Tagging] Deprecate water=pond?

Maybe there is no clear-cut between a lake and a pond - but for me there is at least a clear impression by size of a pond or a lake beyond the transition zone. I never would call a natural small water or a 'Gartenteich' (garden pond) a lake. -- Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG auf Viren geprüft.

Re: [Tagging] What does bicycle=no on a node means?

Am 15.10.2020 um 22:18 schrieb Emvee via Tagging: This recent wiki change by Emvee is in my view not helpful, or even misleading, as it does discourage a wide-spread tagging practice (if we like this or not is a different question, but it's

Re: [Tagging] railway=station areas

Am 10.10.2020 um 00:35 schrieb Dave F via Tagging: I edited a copy of the diagram (A-simple-station.svg) of a station layout, primarily to remove any references to PTv2 tags, a completely independent, duplicating tagging schema, irrelevant to anything to do with the railway=station tag.

Re: [Tagging] What does bicycle=no on a node means?

y does my email program send the saving draft while I am still writing ... does matter only to osm lists ... without asking for the outgoing password - heaven! -- Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG auf Viren geprüft. http://www.avg.com ___ Tagging mailing l

Re: [Tagging] What does bicycle=no on a node means?

Am 07.10.2020 um 23:01 schrieb Emvee via Tagging: Basic question I think, for a bicycle router bicycle=no on a node means it should "avoid" crossing the node likely by adding a moderate penalty as the cyclist could make the choice to dismount passing the node. I know at least on bicycle

Re: [Tagging] Linking Sidewalks to Highways

Sorry sorry for the noise - I dont know, who pushed the send button that often ... Georg ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Linking Sidewalks to Highways

Am 21.09.2020 um 14:54 schrieb Paul Allen: On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 at 11:06, Supaplex > wrote: The problem remains that physically non-existent road crossings ("wildly crossing the street"), which in reality represent a crossing possibility for many users,

Re: [Tagging] OHV greater than 50 inches (wide)

On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 21:33, Mike Thompson wrote: > In specifying access constraints for the roads it manages, the US Forest > service makes a distinction between ATVs, highway vehicles, and "OHVs > 50"." > The first two categories correspond to the tags motorcar=* and atv=* I think, > but I

Re: [Tagging] Addresses with PO Box, and other delivery type addresses.

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 14:43, Tobias Wrede wrote: > Isn't the addr:* scheme used to describe the physical address of a > location/building/amentiy/etc.? > > PO Boxes, privat bags etc. are addresses where mail for someone residing at > said location is delivered to. > > As addr:* I would always

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - survey_point:benchmark

Hi,   I need help in tagging a special kind of survey points: geodesic towers. A new tag may help some.   These are tubular concrete structures, with usual steel triangulation tripods on their top. They have the precise benchmark on the ground level, the tower is erected so that it's

Re: [Tagging] Public refrigerators

On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 15:47, Markus wrote: > I've noticed that recycling:food= has been added [1] to > amenity=recycling wiki page with the meaning "community fridge [2] to > help reduce food waste". > > [1]: >

Re: [Tagging] eelgrass

Apologies for top-posting, but the interface in the browser does not enable me to make any sense of multiple comments. Anyway here goes: Zostera (eel-grass) grows below the tide line, so really is not an emergent plant. Other things in your list of aquatic bed vegetation are also not usually

Re: [Tagging] Barrier=berm

on top seems to be an embankment. A earthwork raised element which has an armoured side seems to be a revetment - I can see no use of this in OSM., but it is in many books about castles and fortifications. In my view earthworks in general could do with analysis to agree terms and usage, they do

Re: [Tagging] Deprecating mini_roundabout

) and their distinctiveness may be helped by viewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Roundabout_(Swindon) and its OSM representation https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.56273/-1.76929=N The nearby Drakes roundabout is a large roundabout identified only by its shape Regards TonyS999

Re: [Tagging] Status of oneway=cw oneway=ccw

all. I've cleaned up hundreds >>>> of routes (most created by Potlatch users though) and my advice is: do >>>> not rely on routes being ordered. >>> >>> In OSM a relation is by definition an ordered list, see >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik

Re: [Tagging] Status of oneway=cw oneway=ccw

on routes being ordered. In OSM a relation is by definition an ordered list, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation : "A relation is a group of elements. To be more exact it is one of the core data elements that consists of one or more tags and also an ordered list of one or more

Re: [Tagging] Status of oneway=cw oneway=ccw

cycle.travel appears to try to follow cycle routes as much as possible. It respects road attributes Peter Elderson skrev den 03.05.2019 15:13: > This one seems to map routes to ways, and it knows the attributes of the ways. > Are you saying it ignores oneway tags on the individual ways? I

Re: [Tagging] Status of oneway=cw oneway=ccw

Hufkratzer skrev den 02.05.2019 12:11: On 30.04.2019 21:05, Kevin Kenny wrote: On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:19 PM s8evq wrote: Personally, I like signed_direction=yes. It's simple and avoids using the word oneway. Also, using the value forward|backward might not be necessary, as it's possible

Re: [Tagging] Status of oneway=cw oneway=ccw

in the opposite direction. How do we add that information in OSM? Current solution: oneway=yes. Not preferred by many on this list, as oneway should indicate a legal restriction. New solution: Some of you suggested alternative new tags, but we didn't come to a conclusion on this yet. What I have

[Tagging] A fool with a tool ... Vehicle service tags

8X- Sérgio V. svolk2 at hotmail.com Fri Jan 4 15:59:48 UTC 2019 As talking on tools, standards and principles, I think what is vital is to follow "OSM principles": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice *Don't remove tag

[Tagging] A fool with a tool ... Vehicle service tags

8X- Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org Fri Jan 4 12:29:34 UTC 2019 Hi, I agree there seems to be a problem here that needs careful discussion & consideration, but: On 03.01.19 16:47, Thilo Haug OSM wrote: > So which ACTION

[Tagging] A fool with a tool ... Vehicle service tags

Forgot to mention : " it follows what `service:bicycle:*` does." is not true. And if you introduce a new system, you should also explain the namespace structure. And not just create a hard to find "notice" which isn't linked to from the affected existing tags

[Tagging] A fool with a tool ... Vehicle service tags

8X-- Bryan Housel bhousel at gmail.com Thu Jan 3 04:39:03 UTC 2019We discussed it here on this list last year. You started the thread even, so you can’t pretend like you "just realized” it. I even asked people to update the wiki.

[Tagging] A fool with a tool ... Vehicle service tags

Hi all, just realized there's a "great" new feature in ID editor, lots of senseless service tags in this format : https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=service%3Avehicle%3A Seems to be over a year ago that someone decided to avoid conflicts between the "street" and the "car" services :

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

It looks as though the key in use is diplomatic in conjunction with amenity=embassy. There are several mapped in the Brazilian city of Curitiba. The reason I'm aware of these was that a friend was the Polish consul during the early 1990s. Jerry On 21/10/2018 18:01, Allan Mustard wrote:

Re: [Tagging] Topographic Prominence for Peaks

On 24/09/2018 07:03, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: Right! Especially on my island, New Guinea.  That’s why we need to check the height of saddles and peaks “by hand”, or better yet by survey with GPS. OSM is the right place for this data, and some map styles and database users

Re: [Tagging] maxspeed:type vs source:maxspeed // StreetComplete

ept overridden for a >> specific vehicle type or a conditional, specifying only maxspeed=50 in >> any of the above cases has to be considered wrong or at least >> incomplete. In other words, the tags you see above would need to be >> added in the case the speed limit

Re: [Tagging] Area of Firestations / Area of Ambulancestations

Hi all, I think this should be discussed here (centrally) : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:WikiProject_Emergency_Cleanup#amenity.3D.2A_vs._emergency.3D.2A Generally I don't understand why the parameters can't be "mixed" (a police station is a police station, whether for emergency or

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

le express the details with an easy "grammar" / "subkeys"). Am 03.09.2018 um 15:49 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > > 2018-09-03 15:18 GMT+02:00 Thilo Haug OSM <mailto:th...@gmx.de>>: > > The principle should be described in general (not only for rental and &g

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

which other key "without service" ?) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbicycle#Additional_keys Cheers, Thilo Am 03.09.2018 um 12:19 schrieb Hufkratzer: > On 2.9.2018 22:06 Thilo Haug OSM wrote: >> {...] >> The current namespace article doesn't mention unde

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

Hi, I don't have a general preference about the format, but I think it should be possible to express several things to rent (buy/repair etc.) and it should be easily be possible to filter for all these items (regardless whether it's a shop/hotel/farm). So the format should be flexible enough to

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

And what if a touristic item (farm, hotel, shop...) offers several things to rent ? Let's say horses, bicycles, jetski ? Am 01.09.2018 um 16:25 schrieb Hufkratzer: > On 1.9.2018 02:55, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: >> >> On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 at 09:03, Hufkratzer > > wrote:

[Tagging] transport=* -key

Hi all, what is the meaning of the transport=* -key ?  I couldn't figure it out because it's often on buildings (possibly "reachability" ?) There's a total of 4 013 usages, but no wiki description : https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/transport

Re: [Tagging] building = house vs detached.

On 23/07/2018 14:00, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote it does not seem to be a very promising concept though. Terraced houses are usually seen as a compromise for people who want an independent house, but cannot afford a detached one. Terraced houses are cheaper because they need less ground

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 105, Issue 26

>> >> Hi, >> >> it is a gut reaction by people when forced with difficult issues to call >> for strong leadership to solve them once and for all. OSM is no >> exception. >> >> On 08.06.2018 01:29, EthnicFood IsGreat wrote: >>> I wouldn't min

Re: [Tagging] Removing helpful information in wiki pages

Hi, IMHO the picture helps understand the process of starting and landing, as not everyone heard about the recent development. I thought this would be helpful to get an overview at a glance. (talking about the spacex schematic picture, not the " long exposure" one, which should only show the

Re: [Tagging] service:vehicle: prefix

Hello all, instead of discussing everything from scratch, let's create a general guideline for shop suffixes. There has already been a former short dicussion with some nice examples, but no productive outcome : General namespace (syntax) for shops :

Re: [Tagging] service:vehicle: prefix

Key:service:bicycle:repair >> >> >> >> On 06/05/18 13:42, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: >>> As part of shop=car_repair >>> >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcar_repair >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>&

Re: [Tagging] tagging LPG only station

fuel:diesel=no fuel:octane_91=no fuel:octane_95=no fuel:octane_98=no fuel:e10=no Am 06.05.2018 um 18:52 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: > How to tag fuel station with only LPG fuel? > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel and >

[Tagging] service:vehicle: prefix

Hi all, what is the service:vehicle: prefix good for, and where is it documented ? (1 223 occurrences) https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/service%3Avehicle%3Acar_repair#overview Cheers. Thilo ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] musical_instrument tag for publicly available musical instruments

perhaps musical_instrument:usage= ? Am 30.04.2018 um 11:22 schrieb Marc Gemis: > Besides the arguments from Martin, > > how do you differentiate the "rental" in a bar, where you can only > play on the instrument, and not take it away from the room/building > from a real rental company that

Re: [Tagging] musical_instrument tag for publicly available musical instruments

Hello all, i think that subtags are necessary for all types of shops but may be the same for every (non-food) type of shop, as all of them usually offer the same (besides sales), so the following may apply : musical_instrument:sales=* musical_instrument:rental=* musical_instrument:repair=*

Re: [Tagging] Identifying language regions

An example, good luck : 56 TSKM, 39 Languages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_of_Togo 41 TSKM, 4 languages : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switzerland (Germany : 357 TSKM) Am 18.04.2018 um 21:49 schrieb Vao Matua: > I would suggest that OSM is probably not the best pl

Re: [Tagging] Tag:shop=shotball

Hi, there's already https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dweapons How about a subtag weapon:type=* The corresponding sport is here : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dshooting Cheers, Thilo Am 08.03.2018 um 13:00 schrieb Александр Львов: >

Re: [Tagging] discrepancy in shop definition and "wholesale" value

I agree with those statements : What they sell (e.g. clothes, groceries, only in bulk packaging) or if access is restricted (specific times, only certain group of people) are separate concerns *and should be tagged separately*. Am 06.03.2018 um 18:55 schrieb Paul Allen: We already make a

[Tagging] "service" tags in general (for shops)

Hello all, instead of debating every single shop (details), I'm in favor of using a name scheme which applies to all (kind "grammar" for it). In the context of the printer_ink shop discussion I stumbled on the "service" tags of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcopyshop IMHO

Re: [Tagging] Shops that sell printer ink cartridges

at > have more than one product.. > a schema like shop=first_level + first_level=second_level etc., > avoiding the need for each application to do so. Regarding "I am against turning OSM into a shop inventory or an ontology of all products on the planet. I agree with Frederik below a

Re: [Tagging] Cycling "service area"

hway=cycle_service_area tag is both useful and > specific enough to be a widely used tag if documented on the osm > cycling pages. > nev >   >> On 17 Feb 2018, at 8:40 PM, John Willis <jo...@mac.com >> <mailto:jo...@mac.com>> wrote

Re: [Tagging] Not mapping personal preferences and details

es is for > profit, if they have specific knowledge of a particular market, such > as motorcycling, then they may use it to advantage. > I don't see any harm in that - after all OSM is mapping crafts and > shops where the people concerned have skills in those areas. > > > >

[Tagging] lunch_specials or lunch:specials ?

Hello all, I stumbled on a bakery which serves warm meals for lunch which is quite unusual (whereas it's common for butchers in Germany) http://www.schmidbeck.de/aktuelles.html There are currently 5 occurrences of lunch_specials on taginfo :

Re: [Tagging] shop - clothing_repair

Maybe a namespace ? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Namespace I think this statement isn't true : " It's impossible to cover all types of shops."' further, it's mentioned : "If you discover new shop types, you may invent your own values" I think this should be standardized, similar namespaces

[Tagging] Vandalism ?

Was there any consensus about this topic ? 8X--- Gîtes les terres noires. (525407874) OSM data: remove 12 occurrences of 'proprietor:motorcyclist' after discussion on the Tagging list that OSM should not map personal preferences

Re: [Tagging] building=maisonette(s)

Hello all, here it's defined as : "A set of rooms for living in, typically on two storeys of a larger building and having a separate entrance." https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/maisonette HTH Am 02.12.2017 um 23:21 schrieb Warin: > On 03-Dec-17 09:09 AM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:

Re: [Tagging] Deprecating of leisure=common and leisure=village_green

On 30 November 2017 at 22:45, Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> wrote: > While making some cleaning in osm-carto we have found that leisure=common > and leisure=village_green are probably not clear enough to show them any > more. They both have deep roots in British law and history and a

Re: [Tagging] passage only on low tide

This seems a good place to use the hazard key. There are a limited number of instances of hazard=tide. There's no reason why post-processing cannot append information about critical hazards to names for rendering purposes, and thus we could avoid the spurious information in the name tag. J

Re: [Tagging] war_memorial

Memorial? - will have to get up there & check it out on the ground); while the "ADF Grove" is, almost certainly correctly, a Memorial. Now, if the Regional Arboretum isn't actually marked as being a memorial to anybody / thing, & therefore not a memorial, how should it t

Re: [Tagging] Proposed deletion of wiki pages about motorcycle_friendly=*

You're talking about things like this ? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dinsect_hotel Have those all been discussed ? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Seamarks/Seamark_Object_Usage When is it "low usage" ? And how should usage appear (in a structured way), if it's not

Re: [Tagging] Proposal: logo tag. Opinions?

not a good idea for OSM. Wikipedia may be large enough and have a good enough mind share for large companies to tolerate the presence of logos in the commons. It is not clear that this is the case for OSM: particularly as the most obvious use-case for logos is in maps of public transport networks.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=* subtags

Thanks for the really exotic examples, I'd say this is : optician also selling delicatessen shop=optician deli:sales=yes deli:type=? --- bookshop in Paris, whose best known feature is the bánh mì sandwiches shop=books fast_food:sales=yes cuisine=sandwich --- sexshop

Re: [Tagging] farm schools?

From: Tom Pfeifer To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, 4 September 2017, 22:56 Subject: Re: [Tagging] farm schools? On 04.09.2017 22:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> On 4. Sep 2017, at 21:45, José G Moya Y. wrote: >> In Spanish

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - building:architecture:preromanesque

First a comment on British usage. The main Romanesque period in Britain does start in the middle of C11 more-or-less coincident with the Norman Conquest. Although some large Romanesque churches were built earlier most were re-built in the decades following the conquest (e.g., Winchester), and

Re: [Tagging] dispersed settlements / scattered settlements

We have plenty of examples of dispersed/scattered settlement patterns which have been mapped without having to worry about lack of tags: more or less the entire Celtic fringe of NW Europe (Brittany, Cornwall, Wales, Ireland, Scottish Highlands) shows this settlement pattern. The nucleated towns

Re: [Tagging] Voting: expand the aeroway key with aeroway=spaceport, aeroway=landingpad, aeroway=launchpad

Another reminder : Vote end: 2017-05-30 (in 4 days) Cheers, Thilo Am 16.05.2017 um 10:28 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > Just a reminder: today voting for the aeroway key redefinition is > starting, please vote: > >

Re: [Tagging] aeroway=spaceport, aeroway=launchpad, aeroway=landingpad

interested in. Karora 10:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC) Cheers, Thilo Am 02.05.2017 um 13:04 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > 2017-05-01 23:14 GMT+02:00 Thilo Haug OSM <th...@gmx.de > <mailto:th...@gmx.de>>: > > [...] changing without reviewing cases individually > >

Re: [Tagging] aeroway=spaceport, aeroway=launchpad, aeroway=landingpad

Am 01.05.2017 um 22:34 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > surely their performer didn't follow the automated edits code of conduct. O really, which case applies ? * changes made by Bots , which by definition act autonomously from human intervention. *

[Tagging] aeroway=spaceport, aeroway=launchpad, aeroway=landingpad

Hello all, as aeroway=spaceport was already in use, I created a wiki description for it : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dspaceport Launchpad is also in use : http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/oL2 I case you feel this should be further discussed, please leave your comment here :

Re: [Tagging] wikipedia links and copy + paste in tag definitions

Hello all, so what is the principle of the "organisation of information" in OSM ? Up to now, I couldn't find a documentation that explains the general philosophy how to tag items. Cheers, Thilo > different organisation of information. > will very likely not

Re: [Tagging] wikipedia links and copy + paste in tag definitions

> Do not falsely conflate "complex" with "worse". You original complaint > was, in effect, that there was a lack of complexity, now you complain > that there is. In the OSM Wiki there's enough complexity (and not everything is "orthogonal"). If you'd lik

Re: [Tagging] aeroway=spaceport , aeroway=launchpad

rally like to be able to filter for them in OSM, which isn't possible if they are tagged as "amenity=space_centre/spaceport/cosmodrome/..." See the examples mentioned here : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Aeroways#aeroway.3Dspaceport For further details I could imagine usi

[Tagging] aeroway=spaceport

Hi all, I'm astonished there isn't a description for spaceports yet, therefore the tagging differs widely : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Aeroways#aeroway.3Dspaceport - Proposals / Opinions ? IMHO amenity doesn't fit well, as it's just another kind of airport. Cheers, Thilo

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

In Germany this is the same : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Post Am 15.04.2017 um 17:04 schrieb Marc Gemis: > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: >> How is it not a post office that just happens to have an operator other than >> the state? > So if

Re: [Tagging] office=therapist??

I think it's similar to : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage "office" is really strange Am 13.04.2017 um 23:23 schrieb John Willis: > > > Javbw > > On Apr 14, 2017, at 4:42 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer > > wrote: > >> Looking

Re: [Tagging] Restaurant that doesn't sell alcohol...

Hi, There are two examples of byob=yes, one of bring_your_own_wine=yes, and one alcohol=bring_your_own_bottle. No doubt there are other tags of which I'm not aware. I would have thought that London must have a goodly number of BYOB establishments, and surely more than 4. Regards, Jerry

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - drying:*=*

Hello all, please check this proposal and comment on the discussion page : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/drying This is thought for all kinds of sport accommodations which offer a possibility to dry your equipment. Thanks in advance, Cheers, Thilo

Re: [Tagging] Vertical farming vs. other vertical plants

Hello all, regarding vertical plants, some examples against air pollution came to my mind. it's not really "farming", but at least an "artificial" way to grow plants, so it doesn't really fit with "natural" http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:natural Do you think this should be considered ?

Re: [Tagging] charging station power output

le and DC charging requires rectifiers build into the station itself. This increases the cost drastically, that's why not all providers go with the maximum these sockets can handle. > Where a charging station limits the total output power due to the number of > sockets in use ... > You ca

[Tagging] charging station power output

Hey guys, two of the criteria on charging stations that matter the most to the drivers are the max. power output of the whole station and the max. power output of the socket compatible with my car. The power output of a specific socket gives some orientation on how fast you can charge in the

Re: [Tagging] A place where letters & parcels are sent to be sorted so they can be delivered?

On 22 February 2017 at 19:56, Dave F wrote: > A place where letters & parcels are sent to be sorted so they can then be > delivered? > > In the Britain I think they'd normally be called a sorting office. but > there's only 21 & 2 for postal_sorting_office from tag

Re: [Tagging] Dead hedge

re closest to wattle fences, although the construction material which is interwoven  is wood brash rather than nice coppice poles. Jerry From: Jerry Clough - OSM <sk53_...@yahoo.co.uk> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <tagging@openstreetmap.org&g

Re: [Tagging] Dead hedge

I've many such things: the material is called brash (sometimes brush) in the UK. It is often just collected in piles or in longer rows (typically at the edge of the area being worked on) and these are usually referred to as brash piles. Brash is also used to deliberately fill gaps to discourage

Re: [Tagging] knotted willows

not choose to add this information to OSM: it is safe to assume that trees in Spanish Dehesa and Swiss Orchards will generally be manage this way. Quite beside which there are something like 37 million oaks in the dehesas of Extremadura. Jerry | | | | || | | | || Dehesa

[Tagging] charging stations: CCS socket wiki conflict

Howdy, on charging stations we distinguish between socket types like Type1, Type2, Chademo etc. But currently the english wiki version differs from the german one on tagging the CCS (combined charging system) socks. The english version uses socket:type2 and socket:type2_combo (CCS) to

Re: [Tagging] test track tagging (vs highway=raceway)

Hi Richard, Not just test tracks. Your post instantly brought to mind the training track at  the Police school outside Merida. I'm sure other Police training establishments must also have tracks designed for training of advanced driving skills. | | | | || | | | | |

Re: [Tagging] Subject: Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=social_path

On 15 June 2016 at 13:10, John Willis wrote: > Why isn't having a footway=trail subtag (or something) seen as a much more > reliable solution? Perhaps more of an aside, but it may explain some people's reluctance / confusion with highway=trail: As a native British English

Re: [Tagging] Orchards and their crops

Hi John, This is pretty much the type of situation which the taxon tag is meant to cope with: current tagging says it's an apple orchard, with taxon we can show that it's one for Bramley's or the cider apples loved by RichardF. "taxon=Malus domestica 'Bramley's Seedling'" This can be used

Re: [Tagging] Orchards and their crops

flowering cherry cultivar. It is a deciduous tree that grows to between 8 and 12 metres high with an 8 metre spr... | | | | View on en.wikipedia.org | Preview by Yahoo | | | |   | From: John Willis <jo...@mac.com> To: Jerry Clough - OSM <sk53_...@yahoo.co.uk>; "Tag discuss

Re: [Tagging] diplomatic institutions (with tl;dr)

and Czech Republic), see http://aethiopien-botschaft.de/ for this, see also my osm blog (about tagging country codes on embassies etc.): - state 2009: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Serpens/diary/5734 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Serpens/diary/9082 - state 2015: http

Re: [Tagging] diplomatic institutions (with tl;dr)

I'm a bit lost in this thread and hope that I'm not repeating what was already said, but there is extensive documentation on this topic in the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dembassy and linked pages. It might be disputable whether tagging consulate generals as

Re: [Tagging] diplomatic institutions (with tl;dr)

Hi, thank you for your thoughts! diplomatic:country=ES I don’t think that is the best solution. Why not? As I wrote: The destination country is not always identical with addr:country – see for example the embassy of Ethiopia in Berlin (destination countries: Germany, Poland, Slovak

Re: [Tagging] diplomatic institutions (with tl;dr)

having an English name for a Spanish consulate to France seems kind of odd for the tag name ;-) That’s a joke, right? ;-) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] diplomatic institutions (with tl;dr)

having an English name for a Spanish consulate to France seems kind of odd for the tag name ;-) That’s a joke, right? ;-) I would not see that a joke. name= should be the locally used name, name:en= the English one. It was just an hypothetical example and the whole discussion is not

[Tagging] diplomatic institutions (with tl;dr)

is not always identical with addr:country – see for example the embassy of Ethiopia in Berlin (destination countries: Germany, Poland, Slovak Republic and Czech Republic), see http://aethiopien-botschaft.de/ for this, see also my osm blog (about tagging country codes on embassies etc.): - state 2009: http

Re: [Tagging] Tagging village sign

On 7 May 2015 at 23:11, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote: Tips on tagging a village sign please. Village sign: an ornate sign located fairly central to the village - such as on the village green. There are lots of these signs near where I live. See

Re: [Tagging] Camps

Lets be quite clear. I am not talking about travellers, itinerant workers etc. That is a different issue. Such places (trailer parks, mobile home parks, travellers sites etc.) are a form of residential landuse. Jerry   From: David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net To: Jerry Clough - OSM

  1   2   >