On 2020-08-01 9:26 a.m., Alan Mackie wrote:
Perhaps I am an overly literal follower of the wiki, but I had always
assumed the coastline should continue inland as far as the tide
continues to be noticeable. Mediterranean mapping might be an issue,
but elsewhere I think this is fairly clear?
On 2020-07-31 8:21 a.m., Andy Townsend wrote:
On 26/05/2020 00:20, Alan Mackie wrote:
Has this edit war stabilised?
Apparently it has been blocking coastline updates across the whole
world for /months /now.
https://osmdata.openstreetmap.de/data/land-polygons.html
On 2020-05-07 11:49 a.m., Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
So, what's the next step?
As a next step, I'd map motorcycle taxis as amenity=motorcycle_taxi.
Vote with your mapping.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 2020-04-02 2:33 p.m., Yves wrote:
Surely this can be fixed if needed, but Osm2pgsql still has a
route_name column?
osm2pgsql doesn't have any columns. It will produce a database with the
columns you tell it to, transformed how you tell it to.
On 2020-03-06 9:22 a.m., Peter Elderson wrote:
That sounds even more odd to me... what if it doesn't match? Do we
have authoritative gpx-es for routers?
No. There is no one true route between two points, so there can't be an
authoritative router.
On 2019-05-15 2:32 a.m., Philip Barnes wrote:
We have deliveroo operating locally, however I have never seen verifiable
evidence on the restaurants that they offer that service.
Deliveroo might not, but there are delivery services that are indicated
on restaurant doors here.
On 2018-11-24 4:38 PM, Alan McConchie wrote:
Here's the overpass query for
boundary=aboriginal_lands:http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/DV4
There has also been extensive discussion over the years on the
boundary=aboriginal_lands page, and it seems like the consensus is that the tag
is necessary and
On Sep 29, 2018 9:40 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
Alas, I don't have much hope that the pull request will be accepted.
I've asked the upstream developers several times if they could
possibly review the proposed functionality (I've at least a draft at a
formal proposal -
On 6/2/2017 4:08 PM, Warin wrote:
At present I have;
hgv=yes/designated and
capacity:hgv=yes/number
Are there any others?
I am tempted to use both of the above tags - covers any future
preference. Thoughts?
The first would indicate that the parking is usable or designated for
truck
On 1/23/2017 12:46 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
Can you point to an illustrative example of leadership on the subject
of MVAs?
The data model used to support having the same key twice with different
values. It no longer does.
___
Tagging mailing list
On 1/23/2017 1:42 AM, Colin Smale wrote:
This subject has been discussed so many times in the past, over
several years. It seems that OSM is incapable of moving forward. The
current data model does not accommodate multi-valued attributes
It used to, then we moved forward to one that doesn't,
On 1/19/2017 5:00 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Looking at a random one, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34154734 /
http://openstreetcam.org/details/10767/4194 — I think in the US we
would just map this as destination=Carman Road;Iriquois and
destination:ref=1
That is how it would be
On 8/11/2016 9:38 AM, André Pirard wrote:
Someone asked on Twitter about a rendering of OSM in Dutch and French
to avoid the clutter of bilingual names in the standard rendering.
https://twitter.com/iciBrussels/status/762743820358418432
The French render is easy, OSM France provides it. But
On 5/9/2016 4:25 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
One of the main characteristics seems to me that it is semi-permanent :
"A parklet may be thought of as permanent, but must be designed for
quick and easy removal for emergencies or other reasons such as snow
removal without damage to the curb or street"
On 2/3/2016 1:35 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
why isn't it signed any more? Has the route stopped to "exist" and
they removed the signs on purpose (but just haven't finished yet hence
the signs on the crossing roads)? I would tag "old_ref" for situations
where the ref is no longer valid, but
There is a stretch of local highway which used to be signed with a ref,
but no longer is. On the other hand, most of the intersecting roads
still show that this highway has the old ref. Some other parts of the
road remain signed.
The two options for tagging seem to be ref=123 or old_ref=123.
On 11/10/2015 11:20 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
I thought the problem was a 2000 member limitation in the API
This is on nodes per way, not members per relation. There are 164 larger
relations.
Even if there is no hard limit, I'd consider a 2k member relation past
the limit of what is
On 9/10/2015 5:20 AM, Joachim wrote:
Define on the wiki page of highway=motorway_link that oneway=* must
also be tagged for every motorway_link. If not tagged, the oneway=*
status of this way is undefined.
Explicitly tagging oneway on links is preferable for obvious reasons,
but you need to
On 8/27/2015 2:29 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
not at all, this might be the case in some areas (that I am not aware of) and
edge cases, but the typical supermarket is 1 storey, in huge cases 2 (and then
one level is typically electronics, or gardening and other non-food articles
and tends
On 8/24/2015 3:35 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
That's not so bad in lua, but imagine writing ... and not
disused=yes into every cartocss rule!
Fortunately, we will not have to do that in OpenStreetMap Carto, as we
will not be supporting the style of tagging where one tag says what
something is,
On 7/8/2015 2:44 AM, Andrew Errington wrote:
They're not really tracks, as they are proper roads, with a concrete
or tarmac surface, But, they don't really go anywhere.
Tracks can be paved - tracktype=grade1 normally is paved, or is built to
equivalent quality.
On 7/8/2015 1:25 AM, johnw wrote:
[trimmed]
The issue is that these “small windy roads that go everywhere” go
nowhere. the land they access is for farming the subdivided sections
... lead you on a tour of the local rice plots and hills.
it is basically access for the farmers, which then have
On 7/4/2015 12:57 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
Is it really necessary for a way that is tagged waterway=stream to
also be tagged oneway=1? Isn't this implied?
oneway indicates that traffic is restricted from traveling the other
direction. I suppose this might happen in a busy canal system, but on
On 6/15/2015 10:01 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Are these functions still handled in (mappable) part of the building?
Entry into the different zones is at fixed points
Are the restrooms and charging stations assignable to a zone that is
constant?
No. In practice, this isn't typically an issue
On 6/15/2015 5:42 AM, johnw wrote:
The only way I could be wrong is if they have a “Schengen” terminal or
something like it : special*facilities* at the airport*separate* from the
normal domestic and international style terminals. Not a separate Schengen line
at immigration, or a security
While looking into some issues around a bad import, I ran across
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenSeaMap/Lights_Data_Model but was
unable to find a page with voting or discussion. Although the tag voting
process has many flaws, this doesn't say it was added because it is what was
commonly
People are adding these tags to OSM, presumably based on the wiki page.
They're on the osm.org wiki, how do they not apply to the osm database?
Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the OpenStreetMap renderer. There are
dozens of renderers that work from OpenStreetMap data, of which OpenSeaMap
is
The Massey Tunnel is currently tagged with oneway=no on the reversible
section and through the tunnel itself.
For the reversible sections (that lead up to the tunnel) they really
alternate between oneway=-1, oneway=yes and access=no. For the two parallel
tunnels themselves they alternate between
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
The question is, what else would go there? Flood gates don't belong
there - that's the *usage* of the gate, not the *type* of gate.
From a technical perspective you may be right, but practically speaking,
we should design
Based on feedback, I've modified
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/sluice_gate
-Original Message-
From: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:tagging-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Paul Norman
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 7:36 PM
To: 'Tag
From: Steve Bennett
On 5/01/2011 3:18 PM, John Smith wrote:
Perhaps a more generic approach would work, eg waterway=flow_control
flow_control=weir|sluice_gate|flood_gate|spillway_gate|
Yeah something like that would be reasonable. What I'd like to see a lot
more of is planning
On 7/01/2011 9:19 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
What do you think about waterway=aqueduct ?
Around here there are quite some historical aqueducts (e.g. [1]). Most
are ruins, but they are still impressive. I tag them
waterway=aqueduct, ruin=yes Some are bridge-like (arches), but others
-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:tagging-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Ulf Lamping
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 2:04 AM
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - sluice_gate
Am 03.01.2011 02:59, schrieb Paul Norman:
I've set up a proposal
03.01.2011 02:59, schrieb Paul Norman:
I've set up a proposal for sluice_gates, which are typically found on
small waterways in agricultural areas at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/sluice_gate
___
Tagging mailing list
I've set up a proposal for sluice_gates, which are typically found on small
waterways in agricultural areas at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/sluice_gate
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
-Original Message-
From: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:tagging-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Rodolphe Quiedeville
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 12:06 AM
Hi,
I propose a to add parking=carpool for carpooling.
I'm not english so please be kind with my
I'm wanting to propose a number of additions to the highway=street_lamp
feature, but I'm unclear on the process. The wiki only covers new tags, but
the changes I would propose would add a significant amount of information
that could be inputted.
___
Bring me a shrubbery!
While doing some small-scale mapping, I came across an area of landscaping
roughly outlined in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Landscaping.png
Landscaping typically has small trees, shrubs, flowers, and other decorative
plants. Being artificial, the natural=scrub
38 matches
Mail list logo
