Then we can deprecate contact:facebook, contact:twitter and the other social media platforms inside the `contact` prefix? If they have a broader scope than just "contact" this should be fine no? And then deprecating Key:phone, Key:email and Key:website in favor of their sisters should be no problem. The keys can be translated via a mechanical edit.
~ Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Remove non-prefixed versions of 'contact:' scheme
From: Martin Koppenhoefer
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
CC:
Am Mo., 4. Mai 2020 um 17:46 Uhr schrieb Sören alias Valor Naram <valin...@gmx.net>:> because some will feel that A and contact:A are not the same thing
Well, the specification says that they are the same thing by mentioning both are used to tag contact information. If they're not the same thing then the ones saying that should explain why and name some examples so we can discuss and find a solution for these cases (if any). But also from these people I did not get any input.please read up the former discussion, this was already discussed. It is clear that "contact:" despite what the wiki says, will always mean "contact", while websites, facebook pages and whatever else is suggested to be put under "contact" will not always have a contacting possibility (and will often have a broader scope than just "contact").CheersMartin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
