Re: [Tagging] Filter bubbles in OSM

else". I don't believe that's quite what you intended to say, but I've slept on it now and that's actually what I'm going to do anyway. See you guys in the changesets!  On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 12:39 AM Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > On 25.05.19 01:12, Silent Spike wrote: > > I

Re: [Tagging] solving iD conflict (was: pointlessly inflamatory title)

at 1:27 AM Paul Allen wrote: > > On Sat, 25 May 2019 at 00:27, Silent Spike > wrote: > >> >> I find this extremely ironic after all that I've read today on this >> mailing list. Have been internally debating calling you out on it, in some >> sense it feels like st

Re: [Tagging] solving iD conflict (was: pointlessly inflamatory title)

> > It serves a purpose because the toxicity came with you. It wasn't here > before. It seems that anything > that runs counter to your viewpoint is toxic. Anyone who points out that > we didn't have any > noticeable toxicity before you appeared is toxic. In short, you appear to > be using

Re: [Tagging] Filter bubbles in OSM

In support of Nick's points above, reading many of the discussions on this mailing list today has me just about ready to unsubscribe. On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:49 PM Nick Bolten wrote: > > What I'd suggest is that (much as I suggested before) everyone tries > to understand how points of view

Re: [Tagging] Definition of Sport

It seem like generally sport in OSM is just any physical activity. However, it's key to note that features are only tagged with `sport` when specifically designated for that activity. For consideration, in the UK parkour is now officially recognised as a sport. If you're not aware, parkour can be

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=inflatable_park

ame scheme). On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 6:56 PM Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 28. Mar 2019, at 18:23, Silent Spike > wrote: > > > > My brain seems averse to the word playground, but perhaps I'm too > attached to that be

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=inflatable_park

That seems like it could be a good approach to me. My brain seems averse to the word playground, but perhaps I'm too attached to that being an outdoor area for children. However, I would ask for some clarification on what you mean by "special support to process it". As surely in both cases there

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=inflatable_park

I couldn't find any good images of the facilities I'm talking about on commons, but they're definitely different from the kind of individual slides/castles described by Martin. See the likes of https://airparx.com and https://www.airspacesolutions.com/airx-inflatable-theme-parks who design these

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=inflatable_park

My first tagging proposal, came across a few of these facilities and figured it is best to establish a tagging for them as they're growing in popularity: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/inflatable_park I feel like this is a relatively self explanatory proposal and hopefully

[Tagging] Appropriate tagging for Redbox vending machines

While looking to add appropriate "vending" tags into the name suggestion index project I came across a US based Redbox vending machine brand. I'm across the globe so not familiar with it personally, but reading the wikipedia page

Re: [Tagging] Forest parcel with other landcover (scrub, scree…): how to map?

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:45 PM Paul Allen wrote: > Around and around we go. This list cannot agree on approving > landuse=forestry because it > doesn't get rendered. The carto people refuse to render landuse=forestry > because nobody > uses it. Sometimes the semi-anarchic nature of OSM

Re: [Tagging] request for review: OSM wiki rewording of tourism=motel based on Wikipedia

I've recently been more involved with wikidata and come to appreciate the benefits of having a structured set of data interlinked by well defined properties. You can see here that the current information there considers motels to be a subclass of hotels (so