[Tagging] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

2020-08-16 Thread Werner . Haag
I agree, a good proposal and compromise, Serves the requirement for more intuitive words about altitude (top instead of head), and also does not use critical geographic terms like mountain or valley station. "dktue" schrieb am 16.08.2020 11:11:44: > Von: "dktue" > An: tagging@openstreetmap.org

[Tagging] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

2020-08-15 Thread Werner . Haag
Hi, it was mentioned, we have many aerialways in Tyrol and there are really cases where the mid station is the one with the highest altitude. I found an example ("Schindlergratbahn", base 2035 m, mid 2643 m , head 2579 m, see link ). So i think, the second scheme with base, mid, head could be

[Tagging] Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

2020-08-13 Thread Werner . Haag
Hi,in my opinion (i think dktue is right there) it should be easy for a user to distinguish or extract (overpass query) the upper, mid and lower stations.That´s not possible at the moment in OSM. Elevation (ele tag) may be useful, but does not indicate whether a station is the lower or upper