[Tagging] Conditional restriction: oneway

Hi, there is a contradiction in the wiki, In paragraph "Restriction type" there is a link to oneway=* while in paragraph "Direction" is wirtten "... use forward and backward ..." . oneway=* has the values yes|-1|no|reversible onewa

Re: [Tagging] capital and state_capital: how are they being used in your country?

Am Sonntag, den 18.05.2014, 09:43 -0300 schrieb John Packer: > Honest question: are there capitals for something besides countries and > states? > There are capitals identical with states. E.g. Hamburg, Germany. Also Berlin, Bremen. At the same time Berlin is, of course, the capital of Germany.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - trafficability

Am Montag, den 06.01.2014, 12:29 +0100 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > 2014/1/6 Wolfgang Hinsch > > > Perhaps the tag 'surface_condition=*' would be more appropriate to > > describe the state of the surface. > > > > A way with surface=cobbleston

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - trafficability

Am Montag, den 06.01.2014, 09:44 +0100 schrieb BGNO BGNO: > Isn't smoothness also based on some form of interpretation? > > Cheers, > BGNO > Yes, you are right. Until now I used smoothness as a term for the state of the surface. But the real meaning is no source, but depends on the type of vehic

Re: [Tagging] parking conditions

Am Freitag, den 03.01.2014, 20:18 -0500 schrieb Richard Welty: > On 1/3/14 8:10 PM, One Hwang wrote: > > Suppose I wanted to tag to show that parking is prohibited on north > > side of Street X. Should I use parking:lane:right or parking:lane:left? > that depends on what the direction of the way re

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - trafficability

Am Samstag, den 04.01.2014, 11:19 +0100 schrieb BGNO BGNO: > We don't have to stick to the term "trafficability". What would be a > good alternative? > > - usability > - passable > - passability (there is an abandoned proposal suggesting this term) > - usable_if > - ??? > None of them. I think

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden

Am Freitag, den 06.12.2013, 15:20 +0100 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > > Am 06/dic/2013 um 13:39 schrieb cracklinrain : > > > > Well, I would say a stone garden without plants is probably still a > > garden. But an area made of concrete is still a (small) yard or else. If > > it's too strange i

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 05.12.2013, 02:10 -0800 schrieb bulwersator: > It should not be changed, garden is garden - private or not. > Filtering out access=private to show only public ones is trivial. > I see also no arguments for changing meaning of tag used over 150k times. how should it be tagge