gt; I'm not sure if OSM Messaging is built-in in JOSM, but it could be useful
for quick messaging in this kind of case
No, due to missing API features. All that could be done is checking for unread
messages.
___
Tagging mailing list
Canal is just man-made channel for water and existence of ones without flow is
possible.
I encountered some (between lakes).
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 02:08:01 -0700 lt;bgt;Pieren
lt;pier...@gmail.comgt;lt;/bgt; wrote
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 5:22 PM, fly lt;lowfligh...@googlemail.comgt;
According to iD editor man_made=pipeline implies oneway=yes in the direction of
way[1]. It is imho a bad idea, because
- it is not mentioned on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline
- direction of pipeline may be hard (I mapped some and in every case direction
was unknown)
and that the feature is rendered with oneway markers.
Thanks, Bryan
On Jun 20, 2014, at 6:49 AM, bulwersator lt;bulwersa...@zoho.comgt; wrote:
According to iD editor man_made=pipeline implies oneway=yes in the direction of
way[1]. It is imho a bad idea, because
- it is not mentioned on
http
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline is not mentioning
how pipeline bridges should be tagged.
I expect that it would be [man_made=pipeline, location=overground, bridge=yes,
layer=*].
example: http://goo.gl/maps/nCtc2
___
Tagging
What is wrong with spaces?
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 04:27:04 -0700 lt;bgt;François Lacombe
lt;francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eugt;lt;/bgt; wrote
Should we retrieve context with other keys or deal with those ugly blank spaces
?
___
Tagging
I agree, introducing weird term instead of something obvious and widely used is
bad idea.
Especially doing this to keep happy small group of inexperienced editors.
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:40:01 -0700 Martin Koppenhoefer
lt;dieterdre...@gmail.comgt; wrote
2014-06-10 12:51 GMT+02:00
Please, switch to something less jarring. Maybe just listing pages or category
would be enough? This banner is rather obnoxious.
On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 11:11:07 -0700 Andreas Goss
lt;andi...@t-online.degt; wrote
WikiProject Emergency Cleanup aims to structure tags and Wiki pages
Shop and building (with the shop inside) are frequently completely
separate features/objects/elements.
I guess that push toward tagging POI as nodes is result of fact that in some
situations only nodes are processed properly (at least that is why I tag new
features in this way).
noexit=yes on ways makes absolutely no sense and mentioning this tagging style
on wiki suggests otherwise.
On Fri, 30 May 2014 17:16:29 -0700 André Pirard
lt;a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comgt; wrote
On 2014-05-30 18:47, SomeoneElse wrote :
5388b60f.9080...@mail.atownsend.org.uk
In Poland all road types are assumed to imply access=yes (at least in my
experience).
On Mon, 19 May 2014 11:05:30 -0700 Richard Fairhurst
lt;rich...@systemed.netgt; wrote
Hi all,
There are almost 8m highway=track objects in the database (thanks
taginfo!), third only to
Is there any difference between access=public and access=yes?
I see no difference and access=public is rare (13:388) synonym of yes, not
documented on wiki (though it appears in JOSM preset).
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Is it reasonable to expect that well tagged road contains all access
tags necessary to check whatever it is accessible?
In other words - is it OK to tag area like proving ground with
access=no, without tagging roads on this area with proper access tags?
Should cases like this be reported by
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 06:31:18 -0800 Martin
Koppenhoeferlt;dieterdre...@gmail.comgt; wrote
+1, it would be premature to switch completely to wikidata at this point, and
the human readable titles in the wikipedia tag have generally this advantage
over machine only cryptic ids
http://goo.gl/maps/H49dF on cycleway going down the hill. Note that it is
possible count this entire traffic interchange as a giant traffic planning bug
(especially cycleways).
I encountered the same for cars, in Poland in mountainous areas very, very,
very rarely there is a maxspeed for
And thanks for providing link! (sorry for separate messages)
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:05:58 -0800 Werner Hochlt;werner...@gmx.degt;
wrote
Hi,
I'm wondering, if you're aware of WIWOSM:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WIWOSM
They provide lists of bad wikipedia tags, too:
I was no aware despite my attempts to find something like this.
But I prefer report produced by my validator as it is providing info what is a
problem.
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:05:58 -0800 Werner Hoch lt;werner...@gmx.degt;
wrote
Hi,
I'm wondering, if you're aware of WIWOSM:
Unfortunately keepRight seems to be dying (I will stop my efforts in
develpoing KeepRight).
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:48:50 -0800 Bryce Nesbitt
lt;bry...@obviously.comgt; wrote
Such a test could have a home in keepRight
___
Tagging
and multiple linked
Wikipedia articles are missing coordinates.
Git repository with this python script resides at
https://github.com/Bulwersator/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator (suggestions for
improvements, bug reports and especially pull requests are welcomed!), some
example report (for Vatican
It would be interesting to someone, but it is not reason to misuse OSM. In the
same way that I will not store results of parliament votes - it is also
interesting to somebody, may be presented on map (where parliament is/was
located) and is completely unfit to be part of OSM database.
On
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:17:06 -0800 Bryce Nesbitt
lt;bry...@obviously.comgt; wrote
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Janko Mihelić lt;jan...@gmail.comgt; wrote:
Hi,
Openstreetmap has been contributing to the Bitcoin revolution with this map:
http://coinmap.org/
the problem is
I think that allowing anything else other than paved and unpaved in surface was
a mistake. Separate paved and unpaved keys should be used for surface details
(surface=paved, paved=asphalt - instead of surface=asphalt, surface=paved,
paved=concrete, concrete=plates - instead of insane
It is usable only for maps generated for area similar to the one pictured,
therefore it should be added at stage of processing data, not to the OSM
database. It suffers from the same problem as lets place a single node.
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 08:16:39 -0800 Tobias Knerr
With mountain ranges there would be a major problem where node should be
placed. Carpathian Mountains cover 190 000 km² - good luck with edit wars where
node should be placed.
It probably would work better as a separate database.
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 03:09:47 -0800 Andrew Guertin
For example to render view of city from OSM data also data about private
gardens, trees, swimming pools etc are necessary.
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 04:26:18 -0800 Matthijs Melissen
lt;i...@matthijsmelissen.nlgt; wrote
I agree with Martin. Also the fact that an object (parking, garden,
It should not be changed, garden is garden - private or not.
Filtering out access=private to show only public ones is trivial.
I see also no arguments for changing meaning of tag used over 150k times.
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 01:37:06 -0800 cracklinrain
lt;cra_klinr...@gmx.degt; wrote
+1, it seems quite obvious.
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 09:46:55 -0800 Martin Koppenhoefer
lt;dieterdre...@gmail.comgt; wrote
2013/12/5 Wolfgang Hinsch lt;osm-lis...@ivkasogis.degt;
how should it be tagged? Is it ok to tag the whole residential area
between the streets as one
landuse=highway - identifies an area of land on which a highway together with
any associated footways and verges are constructed.
I started voting on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway
___
Tagging mailing list
And feedback suddenly appeared. As now people noticed this proposal and first
people against appeared voting was suspended to improve proposal.
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:35:17 -0800 bulwersatorlt;bulwersa...@zoho.comgt;
wrote
landuse=highway - identifies an area of land on which a
In some places (for example Poland) there are available orthophotos covering
entire country, usable by OSM mappers. In USA there are probably maps made by
federal government and therefore available as public domain works.In most
places local governments have very detailed maps that may be
Tons of smaller polygons, city-sized megamultipolygons seems to sound like a
bad idea (and with small ones result gets drawbacks of both idea).
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 08:18:53 -0800 cracklinrainlt;cra_klinr...@gmx.degt;
wrote
The next thing is: How will you applicate such a tagging?
Good idea, I removed it. It is special case, there are situations where next
landuse will not be a private property.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 05:53:44 -0800 Martin Koppenhoefer
lt;dieterdre...@gmail.comgt; wrote
2013/11/17 Tobias Knerr lt;o...@tobias-knerr.degt;
In my opinion, the
To identify an area of land on which a highway together with any associated
footways and verges are constructed up to a boundary or barrier separating this
land from private property. -
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway
It was proposed in 2009 and then proposal died
33 matches
Mail list logo
