Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > in the case of a prison farm I would think it is part of the prison. This > is not about ownership. By the way, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-prison-horses-idUSKBN0ET1RA20140618 is one of the prisons

Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Dave Swarthout
>To me, prisons are not so different than schools or hospitals, in that >there is a land area for the facility and then buildings within. So >your approach sounds right. +1 Cheers, Dave On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at

Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > When it comes to farmland, I would not consider it part of the amenity. > It might > > be operated by the facility, fine. But as we do not tag ownership, the > fact that > > is owned by the institution would

Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Greg Troxel
Kevin Kenny writes: > If I have the cadastral information for the lands (which are usually posted > to forbid entry, so visible "in the field"), what's a recommended way to > tag? What I'm thinking is to put amenity=prison on the whole area and then > barrier=wall

Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 09 ago 2016, alle ore 23:29, Tom Pfeifer > ha scritto: > > When it is a bit of green space around, visitor/staff parking etc, I'd agree. > > When it comes to farmland, I would not consider it part of the amenity. It > might > be

Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 09 ago 2016, alle ore 23:38, Tod Fitch ha > scritto: > > I am stunned to find that prisons are categorized as amenities so the rest of > this thread about tagging details of such seems straight out of a Monte > Python skit. yes, it's a

Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Tod Fitch
> On Aug 9, 2016, at 2:29 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > > Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2016/08/09 22:20: >>> Il giorno 09 ago 2016, alle ore 18:54, Kevin Kenny >>> ha scritto: >>> >>> What I'm thinking is to put amenity=prison on the whole area

Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Tom Pfeifer
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2016/08/09 22:20: Il giorno 09 ago 2016, alle ore 18:54, Kevin Kenny ha scritto: What I'm thinking is to put amenity=prison on the whole area and then barrier=wall or barrier=fence on the enclosure. sounds reasonable to me When it

Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 09 ago 2016, alle ore 18:54, Kevin Kenny > ha scritto: > > What I'm thinking is to put amenity=prison on the whole area and then > barrier=wall or barrier=fence on the enclosure. sounds reasonable to me cheers, Martin

[Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Kevin Kenny
Many of the correctional facilities in my part of the world own land that is much larger than the area enclosed in their walls. Sometimes it's simply open space used as a buffer zone. Sometimes it's operated as a 'prison farm'. Sometimes it's simply inhospitable woodland that it was too much work