I'm not sure how long it is, but California's Highway 1 along the Big Sur coast
(a fairly well known, well loved road) has some equivalently lengthy (or
longer) winding road signs I've seen. If anyone cares to Mapillary-sniff, I
recall one near Carmel Highlands (near the "pink hotel?") and
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 11:24, Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the comments! For the specific linked case (winding road for
> 74(!) miles), it seems that is already covered in the proposal -
> hazard=curves and its sub-tags cover this, and if it truly is 74
> consecutive miles, that
Volker,
Thanks for the comments! For the specific linked case (winding road for
74(!) miles), it seems that is already covered in the proposal -
hazard=curves and its sub-tags cover this, and if it truly is 74
consecutive miles, that I would think it's just fine to tag 74 miles worth
of ways in
I'm "one more OSM Contributor" volunteering my opinion here. I voted for the
hazard proposal as is, although my vote included the note that "this proposal
is a solid foundation for the (hazard) syntax of both today and tomorrow."
There are such things: OSM has many examples of where we begin
Brian,
I am trying to put order in this also in my own mind.
I think we should have an approach which is already clearly structured
towards two things
A the difference between
- signposted hazards
- unsigned hazards perceived by the mappers
B for hazards that may have different degrees of
As the maintainer of the current hazard proposal - I don't really have
strong opinions about signed versus unsigned hazards, though I know others
do. However, signed hazards seem to be something that we all agree should
be tagged, and this proposal is attempting to approve the collection of
