Re: [Tagging] Simple Indoor Tagging
2014-09-22 1:43 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > wouldn't there typically be direct entrances and no corridors? I think if > you are at this level of detail we could expect that you add the poi as a > polygon, rather than adding nonexistent corridors ;-) > I guess you're right. Corridor looks wrong to me too, but indoor=door, indoor=room or indoor=you_are_already_here looked even worse. I guess drawing a little approximate rectangle isn't that bad. Janko ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Simple Indoor Tagging
> Il giorno 21/set/2014, alle ore 22:51, Janko Mihelić ha > scritto: > > Would it be OK to tag the red lines as indoor=corridor? wouldn't there typically be direct entrances and no corridors? I think if you are at this level of detail we could expect that you add the poi as a polygon, rather than adding nonexistent corridors ;-) cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Simple Indoor Tagging
I've been thinking recently about simplified indoor tagging. I've made the next picture: http://i.imgur.com/V09c2KG.png We have two shops and three entrances, and it would be nice to know which entrances lead to which shops. Full indoor tagging would mean that we should draw rooms for both shops, but what if an average mapper doesn't want to draw all rooms for all shops? Would it be OK to tag the red lines as indoor=corridor? I'll be looking at this proposal a bit more, but for now it looks great. Janko 2014-09-21 3:57 GMT+02:00 Matthijs Melissen : > On 20 September 2014 11:11, Peter Barth wrote: > > starting after the SOTM-EU we've worked hard on a new proposal for > > indoor tagging: Simple Indoor Tagging. The Proposal can be found here: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging > > Thanks for your efforts. Two points: > > - Should the level tags be subsequent numerical values, or the level > names signposted in the building (for instance in the lifts)? In > England, levels are often named basement/lower ground/upper ground > floor. In Germany, I have seen buildings that distinguish floor 0 and > floor -0. If a building starts with for instance Ground, Mezzanine, > Floor 1, Floor 2, then it might be confusing to use levels 0, 1, 2, 3 > for that, as then each level key would be off by one with the signed > level. Why not use level for signposted levels and layer for a > numerical order? > > - What is the reason for using indoor=corridor rather than > highway=footway and stairs=* rather than highway=steps? Can a way have > both tags? Sometimes routing through shopping malls is optimal even > for long-distance foot routing, so it would be nice if regular routers > could keep make use of such footways. > > -- Matthijs > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Simple Indoor Tagging
On 20 September 2014 11:11, Peter Barth wrote: > starting after the SOTM-EU we've worked hard on a new proposal for > indoor tagging: Simple Indoor Tagging. The Proposal can be found here: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging Thanks for your efforts. Two points: - Should the level tags be subsequent numerical values, or the level names signposted in the building (for instance in the lifts)? In England, levels are often named basement/lower ground/upper ground floor. In Germany, I have seen buildings that distinguish floor 0 and floor -0. If a building starts with for instance Ground, Mezzanine, Floor 1, Floor 2, then it might be confusing to use levels 0, 1, 2, 3 for that, as then each level key would be off by one with the signed level. Why not use level for signposted levels and layer for a numerical order? - What is the reason for using indoor=corridor rather than highway=footway and stairs=* rather than highway=steps? Can a way have both tags? Sometimes routing through shopping malls is optimal even for long-distance foot routing, so it would be nice if regular routers could keep make use of such footways. -- Matthijs ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Simple Indoor Tagging
This looks like a great piece of work. Thank you for your efforts. I would like to suggest somehow adding access to your proposal (as a level subkey?). Many times there are levels in a building that are restricted for one reason or another and it would help to know which these are. From the examples it would seem there is a way to add a name to a level but it's not clear to me how one would go about tagging it. Access could be added in a similar fashion. Cheers, Dave On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Peter Barth wrote: > Hi, > > starting after the SOTM-EU we've worked hard on a new proposal for > indoor tagging: Simple Indoor Tagging. The Proposal can be found here: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging > > We think that this proposal is simple and holistic at once and ready to > be used. Anyhow, we'd like to hear your opinion if there's something we > missed. Please comment either here, at the proposal's discussion page or > in the original thread in the forum ( > http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=451544). > > Peda > > -- > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] Simple Indoor Tagging
Hi, starting after the SOTM-EU we've worked hard on a new proposal for indoor tagging: Simple Indoor Tagging. The Proposal can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging We think that this proposal is simple and holistic at once and ready to be used. Anyhow, we'd like to hear your opinion if there's something we missed. Please comment either here, at the proposal's discussion page or in the original thread in the forum (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=451544). Peda -- ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
