Re: [Tagging] residential granularity / was Re: OSM is ... right ...

2015-06-06 Thread pmailkeey .
On 5 June 2015 at 13:20, Tom Pfeifer t.pfei...@computer.org wrote: Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2015-06-05 13:36: Am 05.06.2015 um 11:33 schrieb David Fisher djfishe...@gmail.com: As for landuse=residential -- I agree that we could probably do without it. But it does add to the readability

[Tagging] residential granularity / was Re: OSM is ... right ...

2015-06-05 Thread Tom Pfeifer
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2015-06-05 13:36: Am 05.06.2015 um 11:33 schrieb David Fisher djfishe...@gmail.com: As for landuse=residential -- I agree that we could probably do without it. But it does add to the readability of the map, especially at low zoom levels, as it enables you to see at

Re: [Tagging] residential granularity / was Re: OSM is ... right ...

2015-06-05 Thread johnw
On Jun 5, 2015, at 9:20 PM, Tom Pfeifer t.pfei...@computer.org wrote: +1. Drawing a residential around a village was the early attempt with low-res aerial images. With the level of detail you get from both 20cm imagery and open-data property boundaries, my preferred level of granularity is